Nathan Kroll wrote:
I have recently become aware of the fact that Debian is still using
XFree86 4.3 on all of its releases and seems to have no plans on
converting to xorg. Is this true? Is there development underway for
make xorg the new default x server?
I'm just wondering because it seems odd t
Hello!
On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 11:12:50AM -0500, Nathan Kroll wrote:
> I have recently become aware of the fact that Debian is still using
> XFree86 4.3 on all of its releases and seems to have no plans on
> converting to xorg. Is this true? Is there development underway for
> make xorg the new d
On Fri, 2004-08-06 at 11:12, Nathan Kroll wrote:
> I have recently become aware of the fact that Debian is still using
> XFree86 4.3 on all of its releases and seems to have no plans on
> converting to xorg. Is this true? Is there development underway for
> make xorg the new default x server?
>
>
I have recently become aware of the fact that Debian is still using
XFree86 4.3 on all of its releases and seems to have no plans on
converting to xorg. Is this true? Is there development underway for
make xorg the new default x server?
I'm just wondering because it seems odd to me that debian is
Martin,
I had the same problem under linux. Try to disable the X-keyboard
extension with the option "-kb". Example: " Xnest -query localhost -kb
:11" .
Please tell me, if it works.
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PRO
Hello,
I have upgraded xfree in Sid to 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1.
Now all the graphical applications take a very long time to start,
typically a few minutes. Once they have started, they work fine. I checked
the logs, but I couldn't see anything helpful to understand what's going
on.
Anybod
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 08:15:35PM +0200, kevin thackray wrote:
> not load font
> -*-helvetica-medium-r-normal-*-10-*-*-*-*-*-*-*,-*-*-medium-r-*-*-10-*-*-*-*-*-*-*.
> Trying fixed.
> /usr/lib/GNUstep/System/Applications/WPrefs.app/WPrefs warning: could
> not load font
> -*-helvetica-medium-r-n
It may be a WMaker problem
Install wmakerconf (apt-get install wmakerconf).
launch it and go to Appearance Tab, you can choose the font for each
component.
Aurel.
kevin thackray wrote:
I was using previewsly a slackware so i am not very handy with debian
scripts (which i find it quit powerfull
I was using previewsly a slackware so i am not very handy with debian
scripts (which i find it quit powerfull). I have a font size problem
with my window manager (wmaker) : all my apps aprears really big as osd
dispay is ok.
in x config i have :
== XFConfig-4===
# Font section
#
Hi,
I'm having great problems using the different themes of cursor in
XFree86. I'm using the update-alternatives method to change to
"whiteglass" theme - and this works to a point. When gdm loads, all is
fine - but when I log into Gnome - the icons become "huge", sort of
32x32 as opposed to 24x24.
Hi,
I'm having great problems using the different themes of cursor in
XFree86. I'm using the update-alternatives method to change to
"whiteglass" theme - and this works to a point. When gdm loads, all is
fine - but when I log into Gnome - the icons become "huge", sort of
32x32 as opposed to 24x24.
thanks
It definitely helped!!!
Manu
--- ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi,
>
> that works for me with kernel 2.6.3 and XFree 4.3:
>
> i had to add the modules
>
> mousedev
> psmouse
>
> in /etc/modules
>
> hth
>
> ben
>
> Manu w
On Wednesday 10 March 2004 11:24 pm, Brad Sims wrote:
> I did this:
> DisplaySize 382 279
> (my screen is 15" horz x 11" vert
> but nothing...
> Am I doing it wrong?
Got it I wanted DisplaySize 260 195
1024 /100 dpi is 10.24" or 260 mm
So just for the archives the formula for screen size
On Wednesday 10 March 2004 8:09 pm, Josh Metzler wrote:
> I recommend
> setting the DisplaySize parameter in the Monitor section in your
> XF86Config-4. This will result in X setting the true dpi of your monitor.
>
I did this:
DisplaySize 382 279
(my screen is 15" horz x 11" vert
but nothin
On Wednesday 10 March 2004 07:43 pm, Brad Sims wrote:
> Any ideas? Gnome fonts share in the shrinkage
>
> Everything looks normal in /etc... (ie I didn't change anything)
KDM no longer includes the -dpi 100 argument in /etc/kde3/kdm/Xservers. So,
if you are starting things from KDM, that may be
Any ideas? Gnome fonts share in the shrinkage
Everything looks normal in /etc... (ie I didn't change anything)
--
"Next week, a doctor with a flashlight
shows us where sales projections come from."
- Dogbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 04:44:41AM -0800, Manu wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am having a problem with my mouse (Psaux) and cannot
> figure out what it is. It not working at all.
> Everything else work but my mouse...
>
> I have attached the log when booting with kernel 2.6.3
>
> and my Xfree86 configuration
hi,
that works for me with kernel 2.6.3 and XFree 4.3:
i had to add the modules
mousedev
psmouse
in /etc/modules
hth
ben
Manu wrote:
Hi
I am having a problem with my mouse (Psaux) and cannot
figure out what it is. It not working at all.
Everything else work but my mouse...
I have attached
Manu wrote:
Hi
I am having a problem with my mouse (Psaux) and cannot
figure out what it is. It not working at all.
Everything else work but my mouse...
I have attached the log when booting with kernel 2.6.3
and my Xfree86 configuration
any idea?
Thanks
Manu
_
On Sat, 6 Mar 2004 14:25:09 -0800
Number Six <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh, and the upshot of the Slashdot post is these are the first
> OFFICIAL ATI drivers for XFree 4.3.0 --- but that's not true. I swear
> my memory is that there have been 4.3.0 drivers posted on ATI&#x
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 02:21:32PM -0800, Number Six wrote:
>> Why does ATI claim they are just now released, and what does Slashdot
>> think so as well?
Oh, and the upshot of the Slashdot post is these are the first OFFICIAL
ATI drivers for XFree 4.3.0 --- but that's not true.
spomething this
specific but do you have any insight about xv support? in 9800? in the
latest drivers? etc?
"All radeons have open source 2D support." This is according to the DRI
website. I had problems with Xv and overlay under Xfree 4.2 and my 9700
pro. It all works nicely now
of which card they had.
There is a sticky thread at the Rage3D Linux forum here:
http://www.rage3d.com/board/forumdisplay.php?s=7237387fb3bcfc501d16f7cbfe59dee4&forumid=61
I have a ATI radeon 9700 Pro, and 2D in Debian's unstable Xfree 4.3. Xv
and overlay is fixed.
According to the f
pport? in 9800? in the
> latest drivers? etc?
>
> > I have a ATI radeon 9700 Pro, and 2D in Debian's unstable Xfree 4.3. Xv
> > and overlay is fixed.
Boy, I'm stupid. Over and out.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ge3D Linux forum here:
> http://www.rage3d.com/board/forumdisplay.php?s=7237387fb3bcfc501d16f7cbfe59dee4&forumid=61
>
> I have a ATI radeon 9700 Pro, and 2D in Debian's unstable Xfree 4.3. Xv
> and overlay is fixed.
>
> According to the forum, there is a "hotfix"
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 02:21:32PM -0800, Number Six wrote:
> Why does ATI claim they are just now released, and what does Slashdot
> think so as well?
Oh, and the upshot of the Slashdot post is these are the first OFFICIAL
ATI drivers for XFree 4.3.0 --- but that's not true. I swea
What am I not getting?
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/03/06/1436223&mode=nested
http://www.ati.com/support/drivers/linux/radeon-linux.html
The release date for 3.7.0 on the ATI site is 3/2/04.
But the fglrx-4.3.0-*_3.7.0-3_i386.deb .debs I downloaded from:
http://xoomer.virgilio.it/flavi
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 02:21:04AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 09:06:34PM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
> > This means that unless SOMETHING is done about the license, it has just
> > become Non-Free. Sorry.
>
> Before spreading FUD, please understand that "GPL-incompatible"
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
> Great news! 4.4 version is out.
>
> http://www.xfree.org/#newrel
>
> Finally my card is there (ati radeon 9800)
Look for the Xfree86 license problem in lwn.net before you get too happy.
Until that mess is sorted out one way or another, you will fi
On Sun, 2004-02-29 at 21:21, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 09:06:34PM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
> > Sorry Folks... but XFree86 v4.4 is GPL incompatible:
> >
> > to quote from http://xfree86.org/legal/licenses.html
> >
> > quote
> > What about GPL-compatibility?
> >
> > T
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 09:06:34PM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
> Sorry Folks... but XFree86 v4.4 is GPL incompatible:
>
> to quote from http://xfree86.org/legal/licenses.html
>
> quote
> What about GPL-compatibility?
>
> The 1.1 license is not GPL-compatible. To avoid new issues with
> ap
On Sun, 2004-02-29 at 14:47, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
> Great news! 4.4 version is out.
>
> http://www.xfree.org/#newrel
>
> Finally my card is there (ati radeon 9800)
Sorry Folks... but XFree86 v4.4 is GPL incompatible:
to quote from http://xfree86.org/legal/licenses.html
quote
What a
Great news! 4.4 version is out.
http://www.xfree.org/#newrel
Finally my card is there (ati radeon 9800)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brad Sims wrote:
| On Friday 20 February 2004 12:05 am, Chris Metzler wrote:
|
|>I use "apparently" and "supposedly" because I haven't experienced
|>this myself, since I haven't yet upgraded; but that's what I've read
|>in various places today, includin
On Friday 20 February 2004 12:05 am, Chris Metzler wrote:
> I use "apparently" and "supposedly" because I haven't experienced
> this myself, since I haven't yet upgraded; but that's what I've read
> in various places today, including a thread about it at /. of all
> places)
I can verify both for y
Glxinfo showed no DRI, XFree86.log and dsmeg showed that it did load and was working
properly. (though it wasn't)
A gentleman in #debian-devel suggested that I downgrade xlibmesa-dri to version
xlibmesa-dri_4.3.0-0pre1v5_i386.deb and bang it now works .
--
The Internet is the most powerful stu
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:48:53 +0900
Clemens Schwaighofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> | Clemens Schwaighofer wrote:
> |
> |> Hi,
>
> |
> | Did you install xlibmesa-gl and xlibmesa-dri? They replace
> | xlibmesa3-gl and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roberto Sanchez wrote:
| Clemens Schwaighofer wrote:
|
|> Hi,
|
| Did you install xlibmesa-gl and xlibmesa-dri? They replace
| xlibmesa3-gl and xlibmesa3-dri, respectively.
Yes of course. If I remeber correctly, thats even done automatically. I
have al
Clemens Schwaighofer wrote:
Hi,
Yesterday I ugraded 4.3, and actually I didn't except any problems
because I had several other distributions running it without problem,
but ...
Well, in basic, everything is fine, except that DRI doesn't work. XFree
says its enabled, but glxinfo AND
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Yesterday I ugraded 4.3, and actually I didn't except any problems
because I had several other distributions running it without problem,
but ...
Well, in basic, everything is fine, except that DRI doesn't work. XFree
says its en
le,
but would like to get some more insight into the underlying problem.
I don't see any warnings or error messages in the XFree log file.
Any suggestions?
Cheers,
Paal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sunday 01 February 2004 02:40 am, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 04:03:18PM +0530, Sanjay Chigurupati said
>
> > Hi,
> > was looking to upgrade xfree 4.3 . After looking around, find that its on
> > debian mirror, but some patching is on.
> >
> &g
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 04:03:18PM +0530, Sanjay Chigurupati said
>
> Hi,
> was looking to upgrade xfree 4.3 . After looking around, find that its on
> debian mirror, but some patching is on.
>
> does anyone know when it will be made available?
It is already available, i
On Monday 26 January 2004 6:34 pm, Michael Biebl wrote:
an,
>
> i also own a radeon 9200 and had similar problems. What does lsmod show,
> is the agpgart and radeon module loaded?
Yes
> When I switched to 2.6 these two modules were loaded in my case, but dri
> didn't work also.
> The trick was, th
On Tuesday 27 January 2004 2:01 pm, Michael Biebl wrote:
> hanasaki wrote:
> > I have DRI working but check out my glxgears output!
...
>
> Hi Alan,
>
> I think we're getting closer ;-)
> Did you check if the via_agp module was loaded without problems and
You are confusing me with Hanasaki - I don
LeVA wrote:
[..]
I have also a 9200 radeon with xfree4.3. The fact is, that the 9200
chipset is not supported by XFree4.3's 'radeon' driver.
This is what I see when I try to load that driver:
(...)
(II) RADEON: Driver for ATI Radeon chipsets: ATI Radeon QD (AGP),
(...)
ATI Radeon 9000 If (AGP),
ver. So I have to use the fglrx driver if I
want to use up what this card is really for... XFree4.4rc2's radeon
driver can do the fullscreen xv with xawtv, and can play video with -vo
xv with mplayer. You decide what you want to do, but I don't like this
card now as much as I liked it
hanasaki wrote:
I have DRI working but check out my glxgears output!
1453 frames in 5.0 seconds = 290.600 FPS
This is less than 20% of what you have! Could you help me out? Below
is the output of lsmod
thanks
lsmod
Module Size Used by
radeon116332 2
[...]
n package
"xserver-xfree" and "xlibmesa-dri" are from experimental - giving the
following version string in the log
XFree86 Version 4.3.0.1 (Debian 4.3.0-0pre1v5 20031207095205
[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Hi Alan,
i also own a radeon 9200 and had similar problems. What does lsmod show,
hanasaki wrote:
Below output should answer your question. It is an ATI 9000 based board
from PowerColor 128MB and outputs for VGA, DVI and TV
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc
Radeon R250 If [Radeon 9000] (rev 01)
01:00.1 Display controller: ATI Technologies Inc
Rad
> On Sunday 25 January 2004 8:46 am, Peter Schönfeld wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > try http://kano.mipooh.net/ there is a script called
> >
> > install-radeon-debian.sh, run it as root with X not running.
OK took the plunge
1) It has replaced the XFree open source dr
On Sunday 25 January 2004 8:46 am, Peter Schönfeld wrote:
> Hi,
>
> try http://kano.mipooh.net/ there is a script called
>
> install-radeon-debian.sh, run it as root with X not running.
>
Why that one, and not (for instance) install-radeon-agpgart-debian.sh
Thats a pretty scary thing to do. I
ve switched back to Debian, I can get
> it to work, and I can't find out whats wrong.
>
> I am using a standard "kernel-image-2.6.0-1-k7" debian package
>
> "xserver-xfree" and "xlibmesa-dri" are from experimental - giving the
> following vers
kernel 2.6.1
xfree 4.3 from experimental (pinned)
The x4.3 does a very nice job finding the card, agp and drm.
What chipset do you have?
-Roberto
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hanasaki wrote:
I have had zero success with the 3D. I was using straight sarge with
its xfree4.2 and 2D acceleration. Downloaded the ATI stuff and still no
luck. Same situation with my current setup, below:
debian sarge
kernel 2.6.1
xfree 4.3 from experimental (pinned)
The x4.3
On Saturday 24 January 2004 11:31 pm, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> Alan Chandler wrote:
> > I an trying to get my radeon 9200 based graphics to perform properly with
> > 3D. It worked with Gentoo, but now I've switched back to Debian, I can
> > get it to work, and I can't find out whats wrong.
>
> [SNI
I have had zero success with the 3D. I was using straight sarge with
its xfree4.2 and 2D acceleration. Downloaded the ATI stuff and still no
luck. Same situation with my current setup, below:
debian sarge
kernel 2.6.1
xfree 4.3 from experimental (pinned)
The x4.3 does
Alan Chandler wrote:
I an trying to get my radeon 9200 based graphics to perform properly with 3D.
It worked with Gentoo, but now I've switched back to Debian, I can get it to
work, and I can't find out whats wrong.
[SNIP]
(WW) RADEON(0): [agp] AGP not available
[SNIP]
Are you loading the agpg
I an trying to get my radeon 9200 based graphics to perform properly with 3D.
It worked with Gentoo, but now I've switched back to Debian, I can get it to
work, and I can't find out whats wrong.
I am using a standard "kernel-image-2.6.0-1-k7" debian package
"xserver
Hi,
was looking to upgrade xfree 4.3 . After looking around, find that its on
debian mirror, but some patching is on.
does anyone know when it will be made available?
regards,
Sanjay
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
On Sun, 18 Jan 2004 01:40:13 +0100, Jonathan Matthews wrote:
> Unfortunately, I'm not doing a great job. I did a netinstall from
> debian-installer (12-01-04, FWIW, and it *rocks*!), but can't seem to
> get X to come up at all.
My usual approaches in such cases:
1. (as proposed by another pos
On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 12:34:27AM +, Jonathan Matthews wrote:
> Doing a bit of advocay, I've managed to convince a friend to try Debian
> on his newly put-together PC for a bit, while he saves up the £165 WinXP
> tax.
>
> Unfortunately, I'm not doing a great job. I did a netinstall from
>
On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 12:34:27AM +, Jonathan Matthews wrote:
> I'll happily post any config files here, but (off the top of my head)
> the problem is that X bombs after a couple of seconds with "no screens
> found". He's got a NVidia FX mumble in there.
I know that some nvidia cards will
Jonathan Matthews wrote:
Doing a bit of advocay, I've managed to convince a friend to try Debian
on his newly put-together PC for a bit, while he saves up the £165 WinXP
tax.
Unfortunately, I'm not doing a great job. I did a netinstall from
debian-installer (12-01-04, FWIW, and it *rocks*!), b
Have you tried Knoppix or something like that to see if that works graphically? If
so, you can take the X config stuff from there
- Original Message -
From: Jonathan Matthews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sunday, January 18, 2004 11:34 am
Subject: Xfree setup: does AGP require an
Doing a bit of advocay, I've managed to convince a friend to try Debian
on his newly put-together PC for a bit, while he saves up the £165 WinXP
tax.
Unfortunately, I'm not doing a great job. I did a netinstall from
debian-installer (12-01-04, FWIW, and it *rocks*!), but can't seem to
get X t
Hi,
I compiled the latest snapshot xfree for my ATI 9800 Pro card.
My question: which is the best selection from chipsets while running
"xf86config" ; ("ati" or "radeon")?
Thanks
Attila
--
-
- M
Attila Csosz wrote:
>
http://opensource.nchc.org.tw./apt/xfree86-4.3/woody ./
rgds
Axel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Put in /etc/apt/sources.list :
deb http://backports.org/debian/ stable/pre xfree86
deb-src http://backports.org/debian/ stable/pre xfree86
See here for more information:
http://backports.org/installation.html
regards,
--
Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Physics Department
WWW: http://www.pr
--
-
- Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Debian stable / 2.4.24 / qmail -
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 2004-01-03 at 19:19, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> Ing. Vladimir M. Kerka wrote:
> > On Sat, 2004-01-03 at 17:57, GCS wrote:
> >
> >>On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 12:05:56PM -0500, Roberto Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >>>Since it was released about 10 months ago, shouldn't this alre
Ing. Vladimir M. Kerka wrote:
On Sat, 2004-01-03 at 17:57, GCS wrote:
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 12:05:56PM -0500, Roberto Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Since it was released about 10 months ago, shouldn't this already be
known?
Yup, you are right. Anyway, they did break it last time: I had a h
On Sat, 2004-01-03 at 17:57, GCS wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 12:05:56PM -0500, Roberto Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Since it was released about 10 months ago, shouldn't this already be
> > known?
> Yup, you are right. Anyway, they did break it last time: I had a hard
> session on up
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 12:05:56PM -0500, Roberto Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since it was released about 10 months ago, shouldn't this already be
> known?
Yup, you are right. Anyway, they did break it last time: I had a hard
session on upgrading 4.3.0pre4 to pre5 without apt would remove
Colin Watson wrote:
I heard from someone that the reason 4.2 is still in unstable is
because they don't want 4.3 filtering into testing before sarge is
released. That true?
I think that's a misrepresentation, at least at the moment. They don't
want it filtering into testing before it *works* on a
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 02:37:46PM +1100, Jon wrote:
> And further, will 4.4 be out by then? If so, what happens to the work
> that's gone into packaging 4.3, ie. the stuff in experimental? Will
> they just skip that and start packaging 4.4?
You could, of course, answer questions like this by look
> what's holding up x 4.3 from going into sid?
> Is it going to be a long time?
I'd also like to know this. Why is it that the Debian 'X Strike Force' can't
get 4.3 into unstable? Note that 4.3 was released on the 27th of February
2003.
Let's have a bet. Who thinks this 'strike force' can get 4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 05:03:22PM -0800, Nano Nano wrote:
> Should I just do it manually? Is it going to be a long time?
No. Go pull it from experimental.
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :
`. `'` proud Debian admin
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 11:22:49PM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> >
> Hi Nano Nano (are you from Mork's planet?),
> I'm using 4.3 from experminatal. Are you aware that 'expermintal' is not
> a complete distro like stable/testing/unstable. So you only get the
> package you need and when you update, you
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 05:03:22PM -0800, Nano Nano wrote:
> what's holding up x 4.3 from going into sid?
>
> There's some xv-enhancements for my old C&T chip I need.
> I did it manually once. I don't feel like messing with experimental.
>
Hi Nano Nano (are you from Mork's planet?),
I'm using 4.
what's holding up x 4.3 from going into sid?
There's some xv-enhancements for my old C&T chip I need.
I did it manually once. I don't feel like messing with experimental.
Should I just do it manually? Is it going to be a long time?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
Hello All,
First of all I must tell that I'm not a subscriber.
I'm trying to compile wine but I'm facing the above problem.
config.status: executing windows commands
*** Warning: X development files not found. Wine w
--On Tuesday, December 09, 2003 17:01:38 -0700 Terry
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
XFree cannot start. When I select the option to start the program to
make adjustments, the monitor flashes from black to a small window
with the monitor's settings and the message "out of range&quo
XFree cannot start. When I select the option to start the program to
make adjustments, the monitor flashes from black to a small window with
the monitor's settings and the message "out of range".
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
Hello All,
I'm trying to compile wine but I'm facing the above problem.
config.status: executing windows commands
*** Warning: X development files not found. Wine will be built without
*** X support, which currently does
Tom Allison wrote:
Roberto Sanchez wrote:
I know this has been discussed to death already. But what is holding up
XFree86 4.3 from making it into unstable? I have been using 4.3 from
experimental for a few months, but 4.3 was released almost a year ago
and 4.4 will probably be out soon. Just wo
Mariano Kamp wrote:
Roberto Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
__
I know this has been discussed to death already. But what is holding up
XFree86 4.3 from making it into unstable? I have been using 4.3 from
experimental for a few months, but 4.3 was released almost a year ago
and 4.4 will
Roberto Sanchez wrote:
I know this has been discussed to death already. But what is holding up
XFree86 4.3 from making it into unstable? I have been using 4.3 from
experimental for a few months, but 4.3 was released almost a year ago
and 4.4 will probably be out soon. Just wondering.
-Roberto
Wh
Mariano Kamp wrote:
On Sunday 07 December 2003 21:11, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
Mariano Kamp wrote:
Hi,
I have an ATI Radeon 9800 XL card and want to use it with
debian/unstable Kernel 2.6.
From what my googling turned up so far I would need XFree 4.3?
In unstable I "only" found XFre
On Sunday 07 December 2003 21:11, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> Mariano Kamp wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have an ATI Radeon 9800 XL card and want to use it with
> > debian/unstable Kernel 2.6.
> >
> > From what my googling turned up so far I would need XFree 4.
Roberto Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
__
>I know this has been discussed to death already. But what is holding up
>XFree86 4.3 from making it into unstable? I have been using 4.3 from
>experimental for a few months, but 4.3 was released almost a year ago
>and 4.4 will probably be ou
On Sun, 07 Dec 2003 15:19:24 -0500
Roberto Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know this has been discussed to death already. But what is holding
> up XFree86 4.3 from making it into unstable? I have been using 4.3
> from experimental for a few months, but 4.3 was released almost a year
> ago
I know this has been discussed to death already. But what is holding up
XFree86 4.3 from making it into unstable? I have been using 4.3 from
experimental for a few months, but 4.3 was released almost a year ago
and 4.4 will probably be out soon. Just wondering.
-Roberto
pgp0.pgp
Descriptio
Mariano Kamp wrote:
Hi,
I have an ATI Radeon 9800 XL card and want to use it with debian/unstable
Kernel 2.6.
From what my googling turned up so far I would need XFree 4.3?
In unstable I "only" found XFree 4.1. On apt-get.org I found XFree 4.3 for
woody. Would I be able to u
Hi,
I have an ATI Radeon 9800 XL card and want to use it with debian/unstable
Kernel 2.6.
From what my googling turned up so far I would need XFree 4.3?
In unstable I "only" found XFree 4.1. On apt-get.org I found XFree 4.3 for
woody. Would I be able to use it? Any other p
Hello.
people.debian.org is still down. Is there a backup apt source for the
xfree 4.3 backport for woody available?
thanks,
tony
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I've read the hundreds of DRM problems related to using ATI Radeon
cards 9x00+'s, but I've hit a wall that doesn't seem to have been
described yet.
Basically, I've got a Radeon9200. I've got the DRI trunk modules in my
2.6.0-test9 kernel, I've got the xfree86 4.3.0 DRI trunk version and
those
Hello debian-user,
I have installed a Debian Woody with a 2.4.22 kernel taken from Debian
unstable on a Intel 865 mainboard with a Pentium4 processor with
hyperthreading support.
The kernel is configured as SMP and it can see the two "virtual"
processors correctly. Everything works but X cra
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 11:28:01PM +, . . wrote:
> >>Hi everyone I'm tring to build Xfree 4.3 on my debian system because I
> >>need a patch to the siliconmotion driver that has only been committed in
> >>4.3.99.
> >>
> >>I'm trying tw
Hi everyone I'm tring to build Xfree 4.3 on my debian system because I
need a patch to the siliconmotion driver that has only been committed in
4.3.99.
I'm trying two separate paths, and I'm stuck in either.
If you send us a diff, we can include it in the next release. Why d
101 - 200 of 1071 matches
Mail list logo
