El 2023-07-09 a las 07:38 -0600, Deiby Herrera escribió:
> como instalo los driver para esta tarjeta, o se inicia bien con amdgpu y
> xserver-xorg-video-amd pero lo que ocupo saber si eso es todo, no hay otro
> driver que instalar en debian 12
Primero mira a ver si el kernel o el servidor
como instalo los driver para esta tarjeta, o se inicia bien con amdgpu y
xserver-xorg-video-amd pero lo que ocupo saber si eso es todo, no hay otro
driver que instalar en debian 12
On 2021-07-31 at 17:20, piorunz wrote:
> Debian 11 patched kernel is out!
> That will fix everyone who have been affected and they didn't switched
> to older kernel or compiled their own.
>
>
> linux-signed-amd64 (5.10.46+3) unstable; urgency=medium
>* Revert "drm/amdgpu/gfx9: fix the
Debian 11 patched kernel is out!
That will fix everyone who have been affected and they didn't switched
to older kernel or compiled their own.
linux-signed-amd64 (5.10.46+3) unstable; urgency=medium
* Sign kernel from linux 5.10.46-3
* [armhf] Add mdio-aspeed to nic-modules.
Thanks
On 24/07/2021 20:20, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
Why don't you custom compile a Kernel using as base for .config the file
from Debian ?
That's what I did, please see my other post. I downloaded source
package, copied config, changed one line of code and recompiled Debian
kernel. It
Le 24/07/2021 à 21:20, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside a écrit :
Hi,
On 2021-07-23 7:07 p.m., piorunz wrote:
On 23/07/2021 23:44, The Wanderer wrote:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=267503 (from just a few weeks
ago) reports that this is fixed in kernel 5.12.14.
Debian testing,
Hi,
On 2021-07-23 7:07 p.m., piorunz wrote:
> On 23/07/2021 23:44, The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=267503 (from just a few weeks
>> ago) reports that this is fixed in kernel 5.12.14.
>>
>> Debian testing, being frozen, is still on 5.10.x:
>>
>> $ uname -r
>>
On 24/07/2021 09:11, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
5.10.0-7 didn't exhibit this behavior, but anything newer is on a Radeon
Vega 56. Self compiled kernel with Debian kernel config doesn't have
this bug either. Many commits touch AMD "powerplay" features in 5.10.0-8.
Pinning 5.10.0-7
Hello,
Le 24/07/2021 à 01:07, piorunz a écrit :
On 23/07/2021 23:44, The Wanderer wrote:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=267503 (from just a few weeks
ago) reports that this is fixed in kernel 5.12.14.
Debian testing, being frozen, is still on 5.10.x:
$ uname -r
5.10.0-8-amd64
On 23/07/2021 23:44, The Wanderer wrote:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1632 as being an
upstream(?) bug report which covers it. Not sure how directly applicable
those are, but just in case...
That escalated very quickly :D This bug is responsible for this. And
patch works.
On 23/07/2021 23:44, The Wanderer wrote:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=267503 (from just a few weeks
ago) reports that this is fixed in kernel 5.12.14.
Debian testing, being frozen, is still on 5.10.x:
$ uname -r
5.10.0-8-amd64
Yes, that's what I use.
The release is AFAIK
On 23/07/2021 22:46, The Wanderer wrote:
gpu-mon (from rickslab-gpu-utils)
Where does that come from? It's not in current Debian stable or testing.
In Debian, there is old ricks-amdgpu-utils, which doesn't work. New
package has been renamed upstream to rickslab-gpu-utils and most likely
On 2021-07-23 at 18:33, Dan Ritter wrote:
> The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> On 2021-07-23 at 16:44, piorunz wrote:
>>
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I am using Bullseye 11 with Radeon 6800 XT and noticed higher
>> > temperature and noise comparing to Wi
The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2021-07-23 at 16:44, piorunz wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am using Bullseye 11 with Radeon 6800 XT and noticed higher
> > temperature and noise comparing to Windows, so I investigated this and
> > found the fault. GPU core works at 1
On 2021-07-23 at 16:44, piorunz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using Bullseye 11 with Radeon 6800 XT and noticed higher
> temperature and noise comparing to Windows, so I investigated this and
> found the fault. GPU core works at 100% usage at all times, even at idle.
>
> $ cat
Hello,
I am using Bullseye 11 with Radeon 6800 XT and noticed higher
temperature and noise comparing to Windows, so I investigated this and
found the fault. GPU core works at 100% usage at all times, even at idle.
$ cat /sys/class/drm/card0/device/gpu_busy_percent
99
$ sensors
(...)
amdgpu-pci
On Lu, 12 iul 21, 06:08:27, The Wanderer wrote:
>
> That said, AFAIR it was never necessary to have a daemon like that in
> order for my user to wind up being a member of group video (and having
> access to the GPU via GLX), so for such a daemon to be necessary in
> order for my user to be a
On 2021-07-12 at 05:36, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
> Le 11/07/2021 à 20:25, The Wanderer a écrit :
>> Mere minutes after filing a bug report with the Mesa tracker, I thought
>> of something new (of course), and checked it.
>>
>> Sure enough: if I run vulkaninfo as root, it detects the GPU
On 2021-07-12 at 03:49, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Du, 11 iul 21, 14:25:31, The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> The issue turns out to have been that /dev/dri/renderD128 is owned
>> by group render, and my user was not a member of that group. I
>> don't know of anything which should have told me that it
Le 11/07/2021 à 20:25, The Wanderer a écrit :
[...]cut
Mere minutes after filing a bug report with the Mesa tracker, I thought
of something new (of course), and checked it.
Sure enough: if I run vulkaninfo as root, it detects the GPU just fine.
The issue turns out to have been that
On Du, 11 iul 21, 14:25:31, The Wanderer wrote:
>
> The issue turns out to have been that /dev/dri/renderD128 is owned by
> group render, and my user was not a member of that group. I don't know
> of anything which should have told me that it needed to be.
As far as I understand, this should be
On Du, 11 iul 21, 06:54:31, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2021-07-11 at 03:31, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >
> > While your testing + stable as needed mix is pretty simple[1] the
> > reverse mix stable + select packages from testing requires adequate
> > pinning and can quickly become problematic for
On 2021-07-11 at 13:20, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2021-07-10 at 17:36, idiotei...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Le 10/07/2021 à 17:41, The Wanderer a écrit :
>>> That's excellent news; it means that, at least in principle, this
>>> can work in (relatively-)clean Debian as currently constituted.
>>> (It
On 2021-07-10 at 17:36, idiotei...@gmail.com wrote:
> Le 10/07/2021 à 17:41, The Wanderer a écrit :
>
>> On 2021-07-10 at 07:43, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
>>> Hi, Debian unstable with bits of experimental here (because of the
>>> freeze I pull some newer packages from experimental). Same
On Sat, Jul 10, 2021, 9:53 AM Eike Lantzsch ZP6CGE wrote:
> On Samstag, 10. Juli 2021 09:13:57 -04 Brian Thompson wrote:
> > On Sat, 2021-07-10 at 14:57 +0200, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
> > > This is not the point of the OP message, so let's not derail
> >
> > I apologize for accidentally
On 2021-07-11 at 03:31, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Sb, 10 iul 21, 14:38:39, The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> On 2021-07-10 at 14:18, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>>> It depends :)
>>>
>>> In my opinion I'd say the order from less to more dangerous
>>> would be:
>>>
>>> 1. stable + select packages from
On 2021-07-11 at 04:45, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote:
> On 10.07.2021 20:54, The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> I had enough times when I couldn't launch X (at least not with any
>> acceleration at all, even 2D acceleration) because an updated
>> NVIDIA driver which was compatible with the new X or
Le 11/07/2021 à 01:10, The Wanderer a écrit :
On 2021-07-10 at 19:08, The Wanderer wrote:
On 2021-07-10 at 17:36, idiotei...@gmail.com wrote:
There you go, some packages are at the same version in Testing and
Unstable, so you will see them in both.
(Just to confirm, are you the person
On 10.07.2021 20:54, The Wanderer wrote:
I had enough times when I couldn't launch X (at least not with any
acceleration at all, even 2D acceleration) because an updated NVIDIA
driver which was compatible with the new X or kernel version hadn't been
released yet, and enough troubles trying to
On Sb, 10 iul 21, 14:38:39, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2021-07-10 at 14:18, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
> > On Sb, 10 iul 21, 06:51:43, Brian Thompson wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 2021-07-10 at 13:43 +0200, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi, Debian unstable with bits of experimental here
> >>
On 2021-07-10 at 21:30, Geoff wrote:
> The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> (Warning, this is fairly long, and the situation involved includes
>> a fair number of potentially-moving pieces.)
>>
>>
>> I've recently built a new computer, installed Debian, configured it
>> to largely match my previous setup,
The Wanderer wrote:
(Warning, this is fairly long, and the situation involved includes a
fair number of potentially-moving pieces.)
I've recently built a new computer, installed Debian, configured it to
largely match my previous setup, and migrated my data across.
Now, I'm trying to take
On 2021-07-10 at 19:08, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2021-07-10 at 17:36, idiotei...@gmail.com wrote:
>> There you go, some packages are at the same version in Testing and
>> Unstable, so you will see them in both.
>
> (Just to confirm, are you the person who responded above under the
> name Brian
On 2021-07-10 at 17:36, idiotei...@gmail.com wrote:
> Le 10/07/2021 à 17:41, The Wanderer a écrit :
>
>> On 2021-07-10 at 07:43, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
>>> Hi, Debian unstable with bits of experimental here (because of the
>>> freeze I pull some newer packages from experimental). Same
Le 10/07/2021 à 17:41, The Wanderer a écrit :
On 2021-07-10 at 07:43, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
Le 09/07/2021 à 23:44, The Wanderer a écrit :
(Warning, this is fairly long, and the situation involved includes
a fair number of potentially-moving pieces.)
I've recently built a new
On Sat 10 Jul 2021 at 13:48:12 -0500, Brian Thompson wrote:
> On Sat, 2021-07-10 at 21:18 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > Testing doesn't have any direct security support
>
> Is that 100% true? I was originally referring to
Almost, for most of the time and in normal circumstances.. It
On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 01:48:12PM -0500, Brian Thompson wrote:
> Thank you for the detailed response, Andrei.
>
> On Sat, 2021-07-10 at 21:18 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > Testing doesn't have any direct security support
>
> Is that 100% true? I was originally referring to
>
Thank you for the detailed response, Andrei.
On Sat, 2021-07-10 at 21:18 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> Testing doesn't have any direct security support
Is that 100% true? I was originally referring to
http://security.debian.org/debian-security/dists/testing-security
when I was talking about
On Sat 10 Jul 2021 at 14:38:39 -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> I'm a little surprised to see that you don't even mention the mix which
> I've been running for the last decade-plus: stable + testing, which
Most likely an oversight.
--
Brian.
On 2021-07-10 at 14:18, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Sb, 10 iul 21, 06:51:43, Brian Thompson wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 2021-07-10 at 13:43 +0200, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, Debian unstable with bits of experimental here
>>
>> Is it (usually) wise to intermix different suites?
>
> It
On Sb, 10 iul 21, 06:51:43, Brian Thompson wrote:
> On Sat, 2021-07-10 at 13:43 +0200, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
> > Hi, Debian unstable with bits of experimental here
>
> Is it (usually) wise to intermix different suites?
It depends :)
In my opinion I'd say the order from less to more
On 2021-07-10 at 11:14, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote:
> On 10.07.2021 02:44, The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> Does anyone have experience with using Vulkan with AMD graphics on
>> vaguely current Debian, using an even vaguely recent GPU? (Where
>> "vaguely current Debian" means Debian testing more
On 2021-07-10 at 07:43, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
> Le 09/07/2021 à 23:44, The Wanderer a écrit :
>
>> (Warning, this is fairly long, and the situation involved includes
>> a fair number of potentially-moving pieces.)
>>
>>
>> I've recently built a new computer, installed Debian,
ays cleanly uninstall them.
The only thing I would do prior to driver installation is to enable i386
architecture support [2] on my system, if it wasn't enabled already:
# dpkg --add-architecture i386
I wonder why a convenient "amd-driver" meta-package wasn't created yet...
[1]
http
On Samstag, 10. Juli 2021 09:13:57 -04 Brian Thompson wrote:
> On Sat, 2021-07-10 at 14:57 +0200, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
> > This is not the point of the OP message, so let's not derail
>
> I apologize for accidentally derailing. I should have started a new
> thread. I'm still relatively
Le 10/07/2021 à 15:13, Brian Thompson a écrit :
On Sat, 2021-07-10 at 14:57 +0200, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
This is not the point of the OP message, so let's not derail
I apologize for accidentally derailing. I should have started a new thread.
I'm still relatively new to the Debian
On Sat, 2021-07-10 at 14:57 +0200, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
>
> This is not the point of the OP message, so let's not derail
I apologize for accidentally derailing. I should have started a new thread.
I'm still relatively new to the Debian community.
--
Best regards,
Brian
Le 10/07/2021 à 13:51, Brian Thompson a écrit :
On Sat, 2021-07-10 at 13:43 +0200, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi, Debian unstable with bits of experimental here
Is it (usually) wise to intermix different suites? I guess it wouldn't matter
that much for bits and pieces of experimental in
On Sat, 2021-07-10 at 13:43 +0200, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
> Hi, Debian unstable with bits of experimental here
Is it (usually) wise to intermix different suites? I guess it wouldn't matter
that much for bits and pieces of experimental in unstable since you are already
in agreeance with
Le 09/07/2021 à 23:44, The Wanderer a écrit :
(Warning, this is fairly long, and the situation involved includes a
fair number of potentially-moving pieces.)
I've recently built a new computer, installed Debian, configured it to
largely match my previous setup, and migrated my data across.
problem I'm seeing seems to be that Vulkan does not seem to
be seeing my actual GPU, at all.
The specific graphics card I have is
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07WNSP41M , which is a MSI-branded
Radeon RX 5700 XT.
lshw reports it as:
product: Navi 10 [Radeon RX 5600 OEM/5600 XT / 5700/5700 XT
* On 2012 17 Jun 22:41 -0500, Doug wrote:
A keyboard that holds a reasonable second place was called a 2000--I don't
know who made it, bet we had them at work, back in the 90s. They didn't make
as much noise as the model M, but the touch was almost as good.
Was that the Northgate model? It
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 10:40:10PM -0400, Nick Lidakis wrote:
Anybody using an 83 key IBM model M keyboard with a modern PC?
Clickykeyboards.com has info about a key codes adapter here:
http://www.clickykeyboards.com/index.cfm/fa/items.main/parentcat/11298/subcatid/0/id/500722
Was wondering
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 22:40:10 -0400, Nick Lidakis wrote:
Anybody using an 83 key IBM model M keyboard with a modern PC?
Clickykeyboards.com has info about a key codes adapter here:
http://www.clickykeyboards.com/index.cfm/fa/items.main/parentcat/11298/subcatid/0/id/500722
Was wondering if
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 11:40:18PM -0400, Doug wrote:
On 06/17/2012 10:40 PM, Nick Lidakis wrote:
A keyboard that holds a reasonable second place was called a 2000--I don't
know who made it, bet we had them at work, back in the 90s. They didn't make
as much noise as the model M, but the
On 06/18/2012 07:17 AM, Nate Bargmann wrote:
* On 2012 17 Jun 22:41 -0500, Doug wrote:
A keyboard that holds a reasonable second place was called a 2000--I don't
know who made it, bet we had them at work, back in the 90s. They didn't make
as much noise as the model M, but the touch was almost
Anybody using an 83 key IBM model M keyboard with a modern PC?
Clickykeyboards.com has info about a key codes adapter here:
http://www.clickykeyboards.com/index.cfm/fa/items.main/parentcat/11298/subcatid/0/id/500722
Was wondering if anyone is a fan of the old 83 key keyboards and if there any
On 06/17/2012 10:40 PM, Nick Lidakis wrote:
Anybody using an 83 key IBM model M keyboard with a modern PC?
Clickykeyboards.com has info about a key codes adapter here:
http://www.clickykeyboards.com/index.cfm/fa/items.main/parentcat/11298/subcatid/0/id/500722
Was wondering if anyone is a fan of
is a fan of the old 83 key keyboards and if there any
glitches when using one of these adapters, i.e., limits on maximum typing
speed.
I have no idea on that. I did have an 83 key model on my XT clone
wayy back when. I've since graduated to the PS/2 Model M 101 key
keyboards and don't want
/subcatid/0/id/500722
Was wondering if anyone is a fan of the old 83 key keyboards and if there any
glitches when using one of these adapters, i.e., limits on maximum typing speed.
I have no idea on that. I did have an 83 key model on my XT clone
wayy back when. I've since graduated to the PS/2
Philippe Merlin a écrit :
Bonjour,
Sur la liste on parle souvent des pilotes cartes vidéo Nvidia, mais presque
jamais des pilotes vidéo proprio ATI . Es ce qu'ils sont parfaits ? ou
la perfection n'est pas de ce monde...
Il semble que les drivers proprio se soient fortement améliorés
Bonjour,
Sur la liste on parle souvent des pilotes cartes vidéo Nvidia, mais presque
jamais des pilotes vidéo proprio ATI . Es ce qu'ils sont parfaits ? ou
personne ne les utilisent ? J'aimerai avoir un retour d'expérience , les
précautions à prendre, car avec cette magnifique et surpuissante
Am Samstag, 11. Juni 2005 17:49 schrieb Mike:
http://www.debianforum.de/forum/viewtopic.php?p=285648#285648
--
mfg, meikel
--
Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ):
http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/
Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mit dem
Am Freitag, 24. Juni 2005 08:51 schrieb Meikel Schulz:
Am Samstag, 11. Juni 2005 20:39 schrieb Mike:
http://www.debianforum.de/forum/viewtopic.php?p=285648#285648
--
mfg, meikel
Ich vergass zu erwähnen: ich bin im Debianforum der user defrag,
hier könnt ihr den Thread komplett nachlesen
On 11.Jun 2005 - 19:01:22, Mike wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Andreas Pakulat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user-german@lists.debian.org
Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2005 6:20 PM
Subject: Re: ATI Radeon 9600 XT ins System einbinden
On 11.Jun 2005 - 17:49:51, Mike wrote:
Hallo
- Original Message -
From: Andreas Pakulat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user-german@lists.debian.org
Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2005 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: ATI Radeon 9600 XT ins System einbinden
On 11.Jun 2005 - 19:01:22, Mike wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Andreas Pakulat
Ich denke ich wechsle nach einer ausgereifteren Distribution, wo evtl
GraKa,
www, sound etc besser unterstützt sind. Ich melde mich nun von dieser
mailinglist per unsubscribe ab.
Ob man ihm sagen sollte dass er das bei $Distri auch nicht hinkricht? ;)
VIELEN DANK FÜR EURE COMMUNITY -
Hallo
Danke für die hilfe bislang. Leider will xfree86
4.3 partout meine GraKa nicht mehr, ich glaube das "schusselige" Debian halt die
kaputte Debian Version nicht überspielt, sondern "upgedatet" :-(
!!
So nun habe ich hier immer noch dank dessen einen
buggy x-server.
Ich habe auch
Am Sat, 11 Jun 2005 17:49:51 +0200 schrieb Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hallo
Danke für die hilfe bislang. Leider will xfree86 4.3 partout meine GraKa
nicht mehr, ich glaube das schusselige Debian halt die kaputte Debian
Version nicht überspielt, sondern upgedatet :-( !!
Wo ist denn das
Moin Mike!
b) Meinen Mausanschluss kennenlernen, ist der /dev/psaux ? (PS/2)
Probier mal
# cat /dev/psaux
(als root) und beweg die Maus ein bisschen (Abbruch mit Ctrl+C). Wenn
dann wirre Zeichen auf der Konsole erscheinen, ist /dev/psaux richtig.
Ansonsten mit den anderen Anschlüssen
On 11.Jun 2005 - 17:49:51, Mike wrote:
Hallo
Danke für die hilfe bislang. Leider will xfree86 4.3 partout meine GraKa
nicht mehr, ich glaube das schusselige Debian halt die kaputte Debian
Version nicht überspielt, sondern upgedatet :-( !!
So nun habe ich hier immer noch dank dessen
Mike schrieb:
Hallo
Danke für die hilfe bislang. Leider will xfree86 4.3 partout meine
GraKa nicht mehr, ich glaube das schusselige Debian halt die kaputte
Debian Version nicht überspielt, sondern upgedatet :-( !!
So nun habe ich hier immer noch dank dessen einen buggy x-server.
Ich
- Original Message -
From: Andreas Pakulat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user-german@lists.debian.org
Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2005 6:20 PM
Subject: Re: ATI Radeon 9600 XT ins System einbinden
On 11.Jun 2005 - 17:49:51, Mike wrote:
Hallo
Danke für die hilfe bislang. Leider
isa aparecio en los at como una ampliacion a 16 bits del bus de
expansion de los pc/xt que era de 8 bits, se le bautizo como ISA y no
modificó las especificaciones del primer trozo del slot por lo que
deberias poder pincharla sin miedo, otra cosa ya es el driver.
coin escribió:
Saludos
at como una ampliacion a 16 bits del bus de
expansion de los pc/xt que era de 8 bits, se le bautizo como ISA y no
modificó las especificaciones del primer trozo del slot por lo que
deberias poder pincharla sin miedo, otra cosa ya es el driver.
coin escribió:
Saludos listeros, tengo una
Saludos listeros, tengo una tarjeta PC/XT y PC/AT de captura de datos
tanto analógicos como digitales, y tengo que hacerlas echar a andar
para una aplicación que estoy haciendo de un brazo mecánico programado
en C. La cosa es que la máquina más vieja que tengo solo tiene un slot
ISA, ¿son
sylvain a écrit :
Je n'ai pas installé de carte ati sur mes debian.
En revanche, j'en ai installé une sur un portable avec mandrake 10.0
La manipulation devrait être la même a priori a condition de transformer
le pilote propriétaire ATI en .deb
J'ai rédigé une procédure que je joints a mon
k3rn a écrit :
http://xoomer.virgilio.it/flavio.stanchina/debian/fglrx-installer.html
J'ai une radeon 9600 pro...
Et ça marche sans problème...
Tu as l'accélération 3D ?
J'ai suivi les instructions, j'ai les derniers drivers ATI, mais je
n'obtient pas d'accélération :
% fglrxinfo
Je n'ai pas installé de carte ati sur mes debian.
En revanche, j'en ai installé une sur un portable avec mandrake 10.0
La manipulation devrait être la même a priori a condition de transformer
le pilote propriétaire ATI en .deb
J'ai rédigé une procédure que je joints a mon email.
Si besoin, je
Le mar 21/09/2004 à 03:42, Edi STOJICEVIC a écrit :
Bonjour,
Je voudrais savoir si quelqu'un a réussi à faire marcher l'accélération
3D avec cette carte graphique et les pilotes fournies par ATI ?!
Ou si quelqu'un aurait des liens intéressants sur le sujet.
Le Tue, 21 Sep 2004 03:42:36 +0200
Edi STOJICEVIC [EMAIL PROTECTED] à écrit:
Bonjour,
bonjour,
Je voudrais savoir si quelqu'un a réussi à faire marcher
l'accélération 3D avec cette carte graphique et les pilotes fournies
par ATI ?! Ou si quelqu'un aurait des liens intéressants sur le
Bonjour,
Vous pouvez vérifier
http://people.via.ecp.fr/~alexis/formation-linux/xfree.html, section 4.7.
Je crois que c'est assez complet.
Bonne chance,
At 09:42 PM 20/09/04, Edi STOJICEVIC wrote:
Bonjour,
Je voudrais savoir si quelqu'un a réussi à faire marcher l'accélération
3D avec cette
?! Ou si quelqu'un aurait des liens intéressants sur le sujet.
heu oui, moi, pour les 2...
Je n'ai pas testé avec la 9600 XT et la 9800 XT, mais aucun pb pour les
9500, 9700 et 9800.
Je l'ai fait tourner avec
http://xoomer.virgilio.it/flavio.stanchina/debian/fglrx-installer.html
Idem
Bonjour,
Je voudrais savoir si quelqu'un a réussi à faire marcher l'accélération
3D avec cette carte graphique et les pilotes fournies par ATI ?!
Ou si quelqu'un aurait des liens intéressants sur le sujet.
Je suis sous sid avec Xfree 4.3 ...
A+
--
. ''`. E d i S T O J I C E V I C
Estou apanhando para configurar minha placa de vídeo, baixei os diver
da ATI , eles vem em .rpm transsformei em .deb(alien -d xxx e quando
instalo dá um erro. Prossigo com a instalação e vou para fglrxconfig
sigo informando criteriosamente e ao finalizar o ambiente X não
Em Sáb, 2004-08-07 às 16:22, Francisco de Assis Teixeira Folhadella
escreveu:
Nao estou conseguindo configurar esta placa, no Sarge.
Alguem tem alguma dica.
Obrigado.
Francisco Folhadella.
Olá Francisco,
Vc tem que baixar o driver dos site da ati.
Outra coisa,
Segue o script pra instalar ATI's retirado do Linux Kurumin...
#!/bin/sh
#
# Script escrito originalmente por
# Kano - http://kanotix.com
# Traduzido e portado para o Kurumin
# por Tiago Cruz
# http://www.linuxrapido.linuxdicas.com.br
# Baseado nos
Nao estou conseguindo configurar esta placa.
Alguem tem alguma dica.
Obrigado.
Francisco Folhadella.
Nao estou conseguindo configurar esta placa, no Sarge.
Alguem tem alguma dica.
Obrigado.
Francisco Folhadella.
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 23:33, Edi STOJICEVIC wrote:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 06:16:09PM +, Guillaume Membré wrote:
Donc genere le fichier de conf de X avec cet utlitaire
Bon je l'ai généré avec cet utilitaire et j'ai un XF86Config-4 tout neuf
;)
Mais cela ne fonctionne toujours pas
[...]
Salut,
noyau du module agpgart n'est pas aussi performante que celle fourni
avec le driver.
j'ai compilé le module agpart dans le noyau, mais pas le DRM (Direct
Rendering Manager). ce dernier est different du module radeon. De toute
maniere le module radeon est uniquement valable
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 06:16:09PM +, Guillaume Membré wrote:
Donc genere le fichier de conf de X avec cet utlitaire
Bon je l'ai généré avec cet utilitaire et j'ai un XF86Config-4 tout neuf
;)
Mais cela ne fonctionne toujours pas :(
J'ai bien le module fglrx de loadé quand je fais un
On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 23:57, Edi STOJICEVIC wrote:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 12:37:12PM +, Guillaume Membré wrote:
Salut
Salut
j'ai ecris un mail intitulé :
explication acceleration ati 9600 Pro [long] posté le 18 octobre qui
explique toute ma demarche que j'ai utilisé pour faire
On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 23:18, Edi STOJICEVIC wrote:
Salut,
salut
Depuis hier je me bats pour configurer l'accélération 3D de cette carte.
J'ai installé Xfree 4.3 depuis dri.freedesktop.org/~daenzer.
Pour ce qui est de la 2D cela fonctionne correctement ;)
Les outils tels que glxgears et
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 12:37:12PM +, Guillaume Membré wrote:
Salut
j'ai ecris un mail intitulé :
explication acceleration ati 9600 Pro [long] posté le 18 octobre qui
explique toute ma demarche que j'ai utilisé pour faire marcher mon
accelération graphique sous X avec les drivers
Salut,
Depuis hier je me bats pour configurer l'accélération 3D de cette carte.
J'ai installé Xfree 4.3 depuis dri.freedesktop.org/~daenzer.
Pour ce qui est de la 2D cela fonctionne correctement ;)
Les outils tels que glxgears et glxinfo m'indiquent des résultats assez
décevant
ainsi que
Bonjour,
MON ENNUI :
1/
je voudrais juster faire : blablabla.xml + blablabla.xsl =
blablabla.tex
avex xt le processeur xt de James Clark.
comme dans les cahiers de Gutenberg (n° 33 34 Congres 99 : XML et XSL )
alors je
utilisation avec
les trucs du genre com.jclark.xsl.sax.Driver malgrès quelques
lectures de FAQ.
Alors je me permet de solliciter votre aide.
Hello,
je ne comprends pas grand chose non plus en java, mais je suis arrivé à
faire tourner tout ça de la manière suivante :
Récupérer jre, xt, xp
Hello World,
I've recently found the program xtraceroute, xt respectively. I think it's
a very cool program, but I miss a database with all (well, many) of the
.com, .net, .org, etc. servers.
Is there such a database anywhere?
Thank you for your help.
Regards
Andreas
--
Andreas
I'm trying to compile ghostscript 5.5 and I'm getting this:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lXt
Anyone know which library this is?
Robert
:wq!
---
Robert L. Harris| Low quality in a product happens.
Senior
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
