> For whatever it's worth: I think that the voting geeks recommendations
> make sense and I think that fixing a bug in our voting system--even
> one who's effect is statistically improbable--is a worthwhile use of
> our time. I support moving forward with this.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 01:56:41AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:29:31AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 03:00:52PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 03:13:04AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > > OTOH, so far none of
> For whatever it's worth: I think that the voting geeks recommendations
> make sense and I think that fixing a bug in our voting system--even
> one who's effect is statistically improbable--is a worthwhile use of
> our time. I support moving forward with this.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 01:56:41AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:29:31AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 03:00:52PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 03:13:04AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > > OTOH, so far none of
> "Branden" == Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Branden> On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:29:31AM +1000, Anthony Towns
Branden> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 03:00:52PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 03:13:04AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> "Branden" == Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Branden> On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:29:31AM +1000, Anthony Towns
Branden> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 03:00:52PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 03:13:04AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:29:31AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 03:00:52PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 03:13:04AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > OTOH, so far none of this has mattered:
> > "Past performance is no guarantee of future results
7 matches
Mail list logo