Op ma, 14-11-2005 te 23:24 -0600, schreef Manoj Srivastava:
##
In accordance with principles of openness and transparency,
Debian will seek to declassify and publish posts of historical or
ongoing significance made to
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 09:52:02AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Perhaps a sensible compromise between your position and Anthony's could
be to propose that requests of authors be honoured unless a compelling
reason to the contrary is presented and explained, yada yada. But I'm
not going to
Hi Manoj!
You wrote:
Here is my proposed change, that would make the process opt-in
by the actual authors, and still give a hearing to any others who may
be affected. I think this process allows people who may have posted
only under the protection of the privacy umbrella, while
Op di, 15-11-2005 te 02:05 -0800, schreef Steve Langasek:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 09:52:02AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Perhaps a sensible compromise between your position and Anthony's could
be to propose that requests of authors be honoured unless a compelling
reason to the contrary is
* John Lightsey [Tue, 15 Nov 2005 00:40:31 -0600]:
For a policy going forward I would have no objections to sharing
messages which are not explicitly affirmed as private.
I am concerned about this. As the proposal currently stands, to
declassify mails sent after the GR is passed, the same
* Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au [051115 03:12]:
In accordance with principles of openness and transparency, Debian will
seek to declassify and publish posts of historical or ongoing significance
made to the Debian Private Mailing List.
[...]
* The team will automatically declassify
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 12:40:31AM -0600, John Lightsey wrote:
I would be against revealing messages written by or
containing excerpts written by former DDs who have died or disappeared.
I think that's backwards; it seems like it'd make /more/ sense to publish
messages from DDs who've passed
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 01:10:37PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
If, on the other hand (but this may be better the scope of another GR?
I'm not sure, just mention if you think it is), this proposal is
accompanied by a change in -privacy policy from now on, namely posts
will be
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 07:53:28PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
* Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au [051115 03:12]:
In accordance with principles of openness and transparency, Debian will
seek to declassify and publish posts of historical or ongoing significance
made to the Debian
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 10:37 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 12:40:31AM -0600, John Lightsey wrote:
I would be against revealing messages written by or
containing excerpts written by former DDs who have died or disappeared.
I think that's backwards; it seems like it'd
10 matches
Mail list logo
