The campaign period is open according to
http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_002, so here are two questions for all
of the candidates.
1. The past two years have seen higher numbers of candidates standing for DPL
than in the past. While our voting system has no problem scaling to seven
Heya,
Two years ago, Branden Robinson talked about the issue of some tasks in
the project that are neither delegated by the Project leader nor covered
by the Constitution directly. [1] He referenced his platform from 2004
last year (when he was elected), but it seems that nothing has happened
Kevin Rosenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What's specifically is inappropriate about publically stating one's
opinion of a candidate, whether positive or negative, after being
nominated for the position?
IMO it was inappropriate because it was mostly a personal attack
and said nothing about why to
Please, if you email questions of the candidates, put something in
the subject line to indicate the subject(s) of the questions. It
will make it much easier to find them in the archives.
Last year, we had very helpful debate summaries posted by
David Schmitt(?) which helped solve this confusion,
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 05:21:00PM -0600, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
- - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
25a628e9-d88e-40b7-8e1c-888cff421ea5
[ 1 ] Choice 1: GFDL-licensed works are unsuitable for main in all cases
[ 2 ] Choice 2: GFDL-licensed
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 01:42:51PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
- - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Ops, mistake.
Which in a way was good because I noticed a mistake in my choice.
Am Montag, 27. Februar 2006 12:25 schrieb MJ Ray:
Last year, we had very helpful debate summaries posted by
David Schmitt(?) which helped solve this confusion, but I don't
know whether anyone will prepare similar ones this year.
I hear you :)
Since last years summaries where quite work
Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 12:02:11AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
On 10576 March 1977, Ted Walther wrote:
I nominate myself for DPL in this 2006 election.
You havent learned from the worst-result of a DPL candidate ever?
Even None of the above was better
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt writes (question for all candidates):
So, to the question:
Should we amend our constitution to reflect how Debian is structured in
reality, or should the people doing these tasks now be recognized as
delegates of the DPL? What will you do to clarify the situation?
I'm
Mario Lang writes (Re: Nomination):
Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 12:02:11AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
[something]
I find that response utterly inappropriate. It would be inappropriate
even during the campaign.
I guess we are reaching new heights of
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 05:21:00PM -0600, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
- - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
25a628e9-d88e-40b7-8e1c-888cff421ea5
[ ] Choice 1: GFDL-licensed works are unsuitable for main in all cases
[ ] Choice 2: GFDL-licensed
Anton Zinoviev wrote:
[...]
The Project Secretary is the author of the text that was used as a
basis for the proposal in Choice 1. Of course as a sympathiser of a
position somewhat opposite to my position it comes natural to him to
try to oppose my proposal[2]. Nevertheless during the
This one time, at band camp, Helen Faulkner said:
Anton Zinoviev wrote:
[...]
The Project Secretary is the author of the text that was used as a
basis for the proposal in Choice 1. Of course as a sympathiser of a
position somewhat opposite to my position it comes natural to him to
[On 2/27/06, Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since the way these choices are proposed to you is misleading, I have
to sent this specifying message to you all.
Without passing judgement, I'll note that a statement like this demands
well stated proof.
[...eliding background material...]
Hi Debian Secretary and Leader,
At http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001, it lists the text of the
amendments. However, for Choice 3 there is a paragraph at the end that is
not part of the amendment, but is placed and formated such that it appears
to be. I think this is very inappropriate
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 12:18:55PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Should we amend our constitution to reflect how Debian is structured in
reality, or should the people doing these tasks now be recognized as
delegates of the DPL? What will you do to clarify the situation?
There are two
Hrm, platforms seem to be up (mostly), so I guess that makes it answer
questions time.
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 02:01:58AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
1. The past two years have seen higher numbers of candidates standing for DPL
than in the past. [...] what do you think about having seven
Title: InQuiero.com
Inquiero.com / Solución de
atención al usuario sin instalación para CONTROL
REMOTO
Control remoto seguro, rápido y
fácilIncluye VoIP, transferencia de
archivos y chat
Estimado ,
Con el fin de
poder tener la
18 matches
Mail list logo
