On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 06:05:38PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Here is the latest draft of the proposal. I have accepted most
> of the suggestions offered on the mailing lists; I think they have
> been mostly editorial, with cleanup of the language, and
> typographical changes, w
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 16:21:56 +1000, Anthony Towns
said:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 08:12:54PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> In order to bring the constitution in line with current needs and
>> practices of handling assets globally, and allowing the projet to
>> add and remove partner organiz
Hi,
Here is the latest draft of the proposal. I have accepted most
of the suggestions offered on the mailing lists; I think they have
been mostly editorial, with cleanup of the language, and
typographical changes, with no substantive differences from the last
draft.
However, g
> I agree with the sense and letter but have a few factual, grammar and
> other minor corrections, which I'd like to formally propose as
> amendments. I'd appreciate it if you'd accept them. I propose each
> change as a separate amendment so you may accept some or all of them;
> they're numbered
MJ Ray writes ("Re: Constitutional Amendment GR: Handling assets for the
project"):
> Please will you accept one of those amendments?
My proposed amendments 13, 14 and 15 in my message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
change this text to:
Organisations holding assets in trust for Debian should
u
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 10:18:44 +0200, Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hi Manoj!
> You wrote:
>> + Traditionally, SPI was the sole organization authorized to hold
>> + property and monies for the Debian Project. SPI was created in
>> + the U.S. to hold money in trust there.
> I'm wonder
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 22:26:27 +1200, Nick Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> MJ Ray wrote:
>> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> I suggested rewording this condition-less conditional phrase:
>> >> + It would be preferable if the organizations holding assets in
>> >> + trust for Debian under
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: Constitutional Amendment GR: Handling assets for the
project"):
> they're numbered 1 to 14, below.
I mean 1 to 15, sorry. I split one of them up during editing :-).
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [
Manoj Srivastava writes ("Constitutional Amendment GR: Handling assets for the
project"):
> In order to bring the constitution in line with current needs
> and practices of handling assets globally, and allowing the projet to
> add and remove partner organizations from the set of organiz
Nick Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MJ Ray wrote:
> > Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >> + It would be preferable if the organizations holding assets in
> > >> + trust for Debian undertake certain obligations for the handling of
> > >> + such assets, as an example:
[...]
> You
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 08:12:54PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> In order to bring the constitution in line with current needs
> and practices of handling assets globally, and allowing the projet to
> add and remove partner organizations from the set of organizations
> currently autho
MJ Ray wrote:
>
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> propose the following amendment to the Debian constitution. This had
> >> been discussed at length last month, and suggestions and discussion
> >> have died down. I would like to seek seconds for this proposal at
> >> this time.
>
> I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> propose the following amendment to the Debian constitution. This had
> been discussed at length last month, and suggestions and discussion
> have died down. I would like to seek seconds for this proposal at
>
Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> bad re-interpretations to make it mean something else, like the attempt
> to make only the SPI be able to hold assets for Debian that we've seen
> in recent times, which makes use of an ambiguity in the wording of the
> constitution.)
I agree that the constitut
Hi Manoj!
You wrote:
> + Traditionally, SPI was the sole organization authorized to hold
> + property and monies for the Debian Project. SPI was created in
> + the U.S. to hold money in trust there.
I'm wondering about this part. It seems to me like just a historic
overview of the old si
Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> to, 2006-07-20 kello 20:12 -0500, Manoj Srivastava kirjoitti:
>> + 9.2. Authority
>>
>> +1. An organization holding assets for Debian has no authority
>> + regarding Debian's technical or nontechnical decisions, except
>> + that no dec
16 matches
Mail list logo
