Martin Schulze wrote:
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 07:10:25PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
I'd say that I'm not more comfortable with Steve McIntyre beeing
involved and a DPL-assistant (or whatever name his position has)
either, so if Aj stops beeing involved with dunc-tank, (1) is in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ian Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First resolution `We disapprove of dunc-tank':
-8-
BACKGROUND
1. Anthony Towns, the current Debian Project Leader, has suggested
funding the Debian Release Managers' living expenses during the
Le lun 25 septembre 2006 09:42, Martin Schulze a écrit :
Martin Schulze wrote:
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 07:10:25PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
I'd say that I'm not more comfortable with Steve McIntyre
beeing involved and a DPL-assistant (or whatever name his
position has)
Hi Don,
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 08:11:58PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006, Don Armstrong wrote:
As far as placing it or not placing it on a separate ballot, it
would be nice to have it separate, as it deals with clarifying the
firmware problem before exceptions are
On Monday 25 September 2006 05:11, Don Armstrong wrote:
Baring objection, I plan on calling for a vote with a suggested balot
containing only this option in a few days (no later than 09-27).[1]
[The Secretary, of course, can override this suggested ballot.]
I strongly object to separating this
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Frans Pop wrote:
I strongly object to separating this proposal out and calling for a
vote without any alternative proposals or amendments, for the
foolowing reasons:
1) The proposal on its own adds nothing to the status quo: the SC is
currently widely understood to
On Tuesday 26 September 2006 01:40, Don Armstrong wrote:
I agree that there are practical implications, and that something
should be done about them, but I think that they're out of scope for a
resolution whose purpose is to clarify how DFSG #2 should be
interpreted.
I stand by my opinion
On 9/21/06, Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 12:17:18 +0100, Ian Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
3. The person who calls for a vote states what they believe the
wordings of the resolution and any relevant amendments are, and
consequently what form the
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Frans Pop wrote:
On Tuesday 26 September 2006 01:40, Don Armstrong wrote:
I agree that there are practical implications, and that something
should be done about them, but I think that they're out of scope for a
resolution whose purpose is to clarify how DFSG #2 should
On 9/20/06, Denis Barbier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anthony Towns [wrote]:
A question that has been raised is whether the
organisation can be sufficiently outside of Debian when
the DPL is intimately involved. I don't have the answer
to that - in my opinion it can be, but whether
10 matches
Mail list logo
