-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There is a lamentable personal dispute between Sven Luther and some
other developers. There have been some attempts at reconciliation and
various offers, but none have succeeded in ending this dispute.
Two recent significant actions have been:
(a)
MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2. However, Sven Luther should be allowed onto lists where Q posters
request it, where Q is half of the square root of the number of
posters last month.
Does this place an undue burden on the listmasters?
--
* Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable
MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Sven Luther is suspended from all debian lists for a year, which
should be similar to (b), because the project generally liked his
two-month self-suspension and wishes not to receive his discussion
contributions at the moment.
[...]
3. Sven Luther is
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 11:50 +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
- START OF PROPOSAL
We resolve that:-
1. Sven Luther is suspended from all debian lists for a year,
Such things should not be handled by a GR.
GR's are, in my opinion, meant to handle more general decisions, like
describing to
Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...]
GR's are, in my opinion, meant to handle more general decisions, like
describing to what extent the listmasters are authorized to [silently]
take actions for keeping good order on the mailing lists, for what
actions the listmasters need the DPL's
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...]
The main point you are missing, that if you remove the suspension, and
debian claims something about the fault of the previous events to be
shared (which nobody disputes they are), then the list behaviour become
no more a problem than for other DDs
MJ == MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
MJ 1. Sven Luther is suspended from all debian lists for a year,
MJ which should be similar to (b), because the project generally
MJ liked his two-month self-suspension and wishes not to receive
MJ his discussion contributions at the moment.
On Thu, 31 May 2007, Brian May wrote:
Is it possible to act as a developer without mailing list access?
Yes, just as it's possible to act as a developer if you've been
excluded from using [EMAIL PROTECTED]; you just have to use an
intermediate who can send on messages on your behalf.
Don
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 07:26:03PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...]
The main point you are missing, that if you remove the suspension, and
debian claims something about the fault of the previous events to be
shared (which nobody disputes they are), then the
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 06:13:40PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2007, Brian May wrote:
Is it possible to act as a developer without mailing list access?
Yes, just as it's possible to act as a developer if you've been
excluded from using [EMAIL PROTECTED]; you just have to use
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 20:06 +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...]
GR's are, in my opinion, meant to handle more general decisions, like
describing to what extent the listmasters are authorized to [silently]
take actions for keeping good order on the mailing lists,
11 matches
Mail list logo
