On 11/03/08 at 16:22 +, MJ Ray wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...]
> > It seems to me that, for this issue to be solved, we first need a
> > clear consensus on debian-www@ about:
> > - the plan we are going to follow
>
> I believe we need legal advice on the validity of th
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/03/08 at 16:22 +, MJ Ray wrote:
> > There seemed to be broad consensus on BSD-style as default with other
> > DFSG licences like GPLv2 being allowed, didn't there?
>
> I don't think so. Some people want a BSD license, some want the GPL,
> some w
On 12/03/08 at 09:57 +, MJ Ray wrote:
> > > > Questions about that issue:
> > > > 1) You seem to think that delegating someone now would be useful. Why?
> > >
> > > I think we should ask a debian-tied lawyer before doing a lot of unfun
> > > work which may turn out to be useless if we get it w
Hi,
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
> If you were elected DPL for the next term, what would you do about this
> GR and when? How would you ensure that the declassification can happen
> in a timely manner and fulfil all the requirements? What would your
> declassification team look lik
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/03/08 at 09:57 +, MJ Ray wrote: [...]
> > Secondly, delegation should make X's task clear to both this project
> > and SPI in a robust way and seemed the most obvious to me. How does
> > the constitution give the DPL a power to tell SPI that X
Hi Moritz, hi Marc.
I started to wonder about modularity in the use of the Debian
infrastructure in 2006, because of a problem with the clustalw package.
As you can see on the graph, its popcon score started to decrease around
july.
(http://people.debian.org/~igloo/popcon-graphs/index.php?package
On 12/03/08 at 14:08 +, MJ Ray wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 12/03/08 at 09:57 +, MJ Ray wrote: [...]
> > > Secondly, delegation should make X's task clear to both this project
> > > and SPI in a robust way and seemed the most obvious to me. How does
> > > the c
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 07:44:46PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
>Dear Candidates,
Hi Marc,
>in the last few years, it has unfortunately become kind of custom that
>the DPL kind of vanishes from the Earth after the wave of inauguration
>and taking over powers has ebbed. Anthony has been kind of an
>ex
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 03:07:20AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
>Hi DPL candidates!
Hi MJ,
>Will you delegate someone to resolve bugs.debian.org/238245 and
>bugs.debian.org/388141 at long last? That is, get www.debian.org
>to follow the DFSG and to display better copyright statements.
>In particular, de
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 12:46 AM, Charles Plessy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (building non-free on official autobuilders is not allowed).
Untrue, you just need to get your package whitelisted since non-free
packages may not be legal to autobuild. You need to contact aba IIRC.
Not sure why you d
Marc,
Your platform contains the following claim:
> This can hardly be solved from the outside - but a start would be to
> not defame these groups as "evil cabals" hindering the rest of the
> project out of spite.
Why can "this" not be solved from the outside? How can it be solved?
How will no
Raphaël,
Why isn't dpkg in collab-maint on Alioth? Why should it be or not be?
As DPL, how would you react to the recent events concerning dpkg
development?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steve,
You served a term as "Assistant Project Leader". What are the
differences between the job you did then and the job you would
do as DPL?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 01:20:35PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>Hi,
Hi Charles,
>Although I am not yet a DD, as it can happen anytime before or after the
>elections, I would like to ask a question to the candidates.
>
>Debian is growing bigger everyday. I would like to know if you think
>that it
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 03:21:23PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
>> If you were elected DPL for the next term, what would you do about this
>> GR and when? How would you ensure that the declassification can happen
>> in a timely manner and fulfil
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 06:54:50PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> And, just to make things personal, I submit that one of the problems
> is AJ.
Because, of course, making things personal is definitely what the
technical committee is all about, and just generally a brilliant approach
to solving proble
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't think the committee would be worse off without you; and I find
> it fundamentally disturbing that any of the founding members are still
> members ten years later.
I think this sentence strikes at the core of my reservations about this
proposal.
On 13/03/2008, Paul Wise wrote:
> Untrue, you just need to get your package whitelisted since non-free
> packages may not be legal to autobuild. You need to contact aba IIRC.
> Not sure why you don't know about this, nor where the best place to
> store this information is, perhaps the NM templates
Le Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 10:07:30AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> Le Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 09:50:27AM +0900, Paul Wise a écrit :
> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 12:46 AM, Charles Plessy
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > (building non-free on official autobuilders is not allowed).
> >
> > Un
19 matches
Mail list logo
