On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 08:49:51AM +, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> Maybe I just see GRs as a last resort where we really really need a
> definitive answer.
Except they aren't; they're used any time six developers *think* we need a
definitive answer, which is not the same thing.
> Certainly after
On Sat, 14 Mar 2009, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> On Sat Mar 14 14:23, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> >
> > I'm currently inclined to interprete it so that anything that
> > seems to modify an interpretation will require an explicit change
> > in some document. But I'm not sure it's in my power to refuse
> > a
On Sat Mar 14 19:40, Russ Allbery wrote:
> It makes an advisory project statement about the project interpretation of
> the FD. DDs can choose to follow that interpretation or not as they
> choose in their own work, but I would expect that people who didn't have a
> strong opinion would tend to fo
3 matches
Mail list logo
