Debian Project Leader Elections 2013: Call for votes

2013-03-30 Thread Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx
Hi, This is the first call for votes for the Debian Project Leader Elections 2013. Voting period starts 00:00:00 UTC on Sunday, March 31st, 2013 Votes must be received by 23:59:59 UTC on Saturday, April 13th, 2013 This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constituti

Re: [all candidates] Removing or limiting DD rights?

2013-03-30 Thread Gergely Nagy
gregor herrmann writes: > On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 18:02:08 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > >> On 25/03/13 at 16:22 +, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> > Are we strict enough with our existing contributors? When we're trying >> > to work together as best we can to make the Universal Operating System >> > h

Re: [all candidates] What to do with debian-private ?

2013-03-30 Thread Gergely Nagy
Charles Plessy writes: > If this has not changed, is that something that the DPL candidates would > like to tackle ? (Bonus question to the DPL candidates: are you subscribed > to debian-private ?) Private is like it always was (I am subscribed, and have been for every day of my DDship). Fortun

Re: [all candidates] What to do with debian-private ?

2013-03-30 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 08:59:39AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > I'm not sure we need that. There's an expectation that vacation messages > have a [vac] prefix in the subject, which is mostly followed (although > sometimes people do forget it). That makes it fairly easy to filter them > out for t

Re: [all candidates] What to do with debian-private ?

2013-03-30 Thread Moray Allan
On 2013-03-29 19:34, Charles Plessy wrote: How is the state of -private those days ? When I unsubscribed, it was still mixing informations that are really private, like "Alice takes holidays in Honolulu", some that may be private by accident, like "Bob wants to package libfoo-perl", and some

Re: [all candidates] What to do with debian-private ?

2013-03-30 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On 30-03-13 02:49, Russ Allbery wrote: > I have no objections to the vacation messages (personally, I find them > interesting), Same here. > but we could certainly make a separate list with the same > nondisclosure requirements as -private devoted specifically to those > messages and any followup

Re: [all candidates] What to do with debian-private ?

2013-03-30 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 30/03/13 at 10:34 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 03:35:40PM -0700, Don Armstrong a écrit : > > > > -private is notified so DDs are aware. > > How is the state of -private those days ? When I unsubscribed, it was still > mixing informations that are really private, like