Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer writes:
> On Wednesday 26 August 2015 15:18:36 Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I second the below text, for both changes.
> FWIW, at least on my mail client I'm failing to verify this signature.
> Not that is *that* important considering the number of seconds already
>
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 05:30:38PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 August 2015 15:18:36 Russ Allbery wrote:
> > I second the below text, for both changes.
>
> FWIW, at least on my mail client I'm failing to verify this signature.
> Not that is *that* important
On Wednesday 26 August 2015 15:18:36 Russ Allbery wrote:
> I second the below text, for both changes.
FWIW, at least on my mail client I'm failing to verify this signature.
Not that is *that* important considering the number of seconds already
available, but I thought it was better to make it cle
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 04:49:08PM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 31 August 2015 at 08:06, Kurt Roeckx - Debian Project Secretary
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > A new GR has been started to update the Standard Resolution
> > Procedure. Details about it can be found on:
> > https://w
Russ Allbery writes:
> Dimitri John Ledkov writes:
>> I'm failing to understand the current situation, nor proposed changes.
>> Can someone please give a plain English explanation and/or examples?
>> E.g. committee of size N is voting on an issue I which happens to be
>> overriding developer. T
Dimitri John Ledkov writes:
> I'm failing to understand the current situation, nor proposed changes.
> Can someone please give a plain English explanation and/or examples?
> E.g. committee of size N is voting on an issue I which happens to be
> overriding developer. The votes are F for, A agains
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> On 31 August 2015 at 08:06, Kurt Roeckx - Debian Project Secretary
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > A new GR has been started to update the Standard Resolution
> > Procedure. Details about it can be found on:
> > https://www.debian.org/vote/2015/vote_002
Hello,
On 31 August 2015 at 08:06, Kurt Roeckx - Debian Project Secretary
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A new GR has been started to update the Standard Resolution
> Procedure. Details about it can be found on:
> https://www.debian.org/vote/2015/vote_002
>
I'm failing to understand the current situation, no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (o...@debian.org) [150831 11:23]:
> Le lundi, 31 août 2015, 11.04:59 Axel Beckert a écrit :
> > As far as I understand this would mean proposing an alternative choice
> > for the voter. In that case, the damage is already done a
Hi Didier,
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Le lundi, 31 août 2015, 11.04:59 Axel Beckert a écrit :
> > I would have preferred if "off-by-one" would have been used instead of
> > "fencepost" as in the subject of the original GR proposal. That term
> > is later missing in the announcement by Kurt as w
Andreas: GR amendment proposal below.
Le lundi, 31 août 2015, 11.04:59 Axel Beckert a écrit :
> I would have preferred if "off-by-one" would have been used instead of
> "fencepost" as in the subject of the original GR proposal. That term
> is later missing in the announcement by Kurt as well as on
Hi,
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Le lundi, 31 août 2015, 10.26:18 Axel Beckert a écrit :
> > Kurt Roeckx - Debian Project Secretary wrote:
> > > https://www.debian.org/vote/2015/vote_002
> >
> > Please either do not use the word combination "fencepost bug" at all
> > or explain its meaning.
>
>
Hi Axel,
(CC'ing aba, as GR proposer).
Le lundi, 31 août 2015, 10.26:18 Axel Beckert a écrit :
> Kurt Roeckx - Debian Project Secretary wrote:
> > https://www.debian.org/vote/2015/vote_002
>
> Please either do not use the word combination "fencepost bug" at all
> or explain its meaning.
These w
also sprach Axel Beckert [2015-08-31 10:26 +0200]:
> Please either do not use the word combination "fencepost bug" at all
> or explain its meaning.
>
> As far as I could find out it refers to a political joke (!) in the
> USA comparing a "fencepost turtle" to e.g. George W. Bush or Sarah
> Palin.
Hi,
Kurt Roeckx - Debian Project Secretary wrote:
> https://www.debian.org/vote/2015/vote_002
Please either do not use the word combination "fencepost bug" at all
or explain its meaning.
As far as I could find out it refers to a political joke (!) in the
USA comparing a "fencepost turtle" to e.g
15 matches
Mail list logo
