On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 08:19:16AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
> On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 09:02:22 +0200, Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
>
> > Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> The draft ballot for this vote is appended. Please note that this
> >> is a draft bal
iscussion Period:
Thursday, 21st September, 2006
Wednesday, 4th October, 2006
Voting Period
Thursday, 5th October, 00:00:00 UTC, 2006
Thursday, 12th October, 00:00:00 UTC, 2006
Denis Barbier
[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 03:00:52PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As I currently understand it, the General resolution to recall
> the project leader stands with enough seconds; and that the requisite
> seconds were there on the 21st of September. One second was
> rescinded.
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 11:04:14AM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2006, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > As per <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on -project, the
> > minimum discussion period is varied to one week, so you can call for a
> > vote at any time. As per that message, you and Lo
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 10:35:51AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:14:57 -0500, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
>
> > On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:44:36 +0200, Sven Luther
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >> Denis, if this issue gets voted before the clarification o
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 07:51:06PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
[...]
> > But we, Debian developers, can make this confusion vanish, and I
> > would like to propose that we answer to the valid question quoted
> > in the second paragraph above by recalling our Project Leader, as
> > allowed by our Co
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 09:02:19PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> On 9/20/06, Denis Barbier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Anthony Towns [wrote]:
> > A question that has been raised is whether the
> > organisation can be sufficiently "outside" of Debian when
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 11:43:11PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2006, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > My proposal was intended to be straightforward, to answer a simple
> > question: "whether the [Dunc] organisation can be sufficiently
> > "outside"
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 12:45:59PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2006, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > Now, if you strip your counter-proposal down to
> > The Dunc project is not the result of a decision of the Debian Project
> > I will second it and withdraw my pr
[I am using a webmail from work, sorry for breaking the thread]
[Loic Minier]
> So, did the Debian Project Leader take the decision to fund our RMs,
> for example with Debian's money? Did he take the decision to
> officially request funding? NO.
>
> Instead, he did his best to take off hi
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 04:09:34PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 10:59:53PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > Debian to decide.
> >
> > This vote is in my opinion the best way to answer this question.
>
> It does nothing of the kind. You
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 03:44:19PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 08:10:05PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Seconded.
>
> I am shocked at the support that this is seeing, and I wonder if people
> are letting their feelings about this particular project cloud their
> judgeme
he Debian project.
But we, Debian developers, can make this confusion vanish, and I
would like to propose that we answer to the valid question quoted
in the second paragraph above by recalling our Project Leader, as
allowed by our Constitution (section 4.1.1) and am seeking seconds
for this propos
13 matches
Mail list logo
