Hi.
To make a rather complicated and long story short: Accessibility of
graphical user interfaces in Debian has taken a slight step backward
with the GNOME 3 rewrite. Squeeze was more stable regarding this.
While discussing this topic on IRC with other Debian people I was kind
of shocked to read
Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 12:02:11AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>> On 10576 March 1977, Ted Walther wrote:
>> > I nominate myself for DPL in this 2006 election.
>>
>> You havent learned from the worst-result of a DPL candidate ever?
>> Even "None of the abo
"Benj. Mako Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 02:14:39PM +0100, Mario Lang wrote:
>> I have seen lots of discussions about CDD and splitting up Debian
>> into a core and more-or-less independent topic specific sections
>> recently.
"Benj. Mako Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 02:14:39PM +0100, Mario Lang wrote:
>> I have seen lots of discussions about CDD and splitting up Debian
>> into a core and more-or-less independent topic specific sections
>> recently.
Hi.
OK, I admit I am late. I wanted to ask this some days ago,
but apparently forgot about it, and now, the voting period already
started. If you feel for some reason that it is inappropriate
to answer this question after the voting period has started,
I'll have to accept this. Please accept my
Hi.
OK, I admit I am late. I wanted to ask this some days ago,
but apparently forgot about it, and now, the voting period already
started. If you feel for some reason that it is inappropriate
to answer this question after the voting period has started,
I'll have to accept this. Please accept my
Glenn McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 16:03:41 -0600
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> My original point was that people who do not actually
>> exercise their franchise are unlikely to be one of the active set --
>> and need to be looked at to see
Glenn McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 16:03:41 -0600
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> My original point was that people who do not actually
>> exercise their franchise are unlikely to be one of the active set --
>> and need to be looked at to see
8 matches
Mail list logo
