Re: Call for vote: public statement about the EU Legislation "Cyber Resilience Act and Product Liability Directive"

Hi, Thanks for pushing this forward. Seconded. Cheers, Nicolas On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 12:10:21PM -0300, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote: > Dear Debian Fellows, > > Following the email sent by Ilu to debian-project (Message-ID: > <4b93ed08-f148-4c7f-b172-f967f7de7...@gmx.net>), and as we have >

Re: Call for votes on «Statement regarding Richard Stallman's readmission to the FSF board»

ption doesn't really fit within the "condemn → support" axis you've proposed. I think I agree with how the other options are ordered. Thanks, -- Nicolas Dandrimont

Re: Amendment to RMS/FSF GR: Option 4, assert the need to learn and grow from recent events

ect, and that they feel safe and > secure in our communities - including when we meet in person. > > END CHOICE TEXT Seconded. Thank you, -- Nicolas Dandrimont signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io

On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 01:54:16PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote : > Under 4.1.5 of the Constitution, the developers by way of GR are the body > who has the power to issue nontechnical statements. > > https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io/blob/main/index.md > is a statement

Re: Question for DPL candidates: Teetotaler outreach

k non-grapey, non-alcoholic and non-lactose-based options were plentiful for the DC16 party, but if they didn't suit you, or weren't advertised enough, let me know so we can improve. Cheers, -- Nicolas Dandrimont DebConf Cheese Wrangler BOFH excuse #412: Radial Telemetry Infiltration signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Amendment to Proposed GR: Declassifying parts of -private of historical interest

* Bart Martens <ba...@debian.org> [2016-08-07 13:58:46 +]: > Hi Nicolas, Hi, > On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 02:54:36PM +0200, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote: > > In my opinion the only point in this General Resolution is allowing the > > declassification of the early

Re: Amendment to Proposed GR: Declassifying parts of -private of historical interest

r extracting the really interesting content. I trust the listmasters or their chosen declassification team to come up with a workable process of their liking, and to apply good judgement in unraveling historically interesting threads while upholding the privacy of what needs to be kept private. Cheers, -- Nicolas Dandrimont BOFH excuse #125: we just switched to Sprint. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Call for votes: Declassifying parts of -private of historical interest

* Nicolas Dandrimont <ol...@debian.org> [2016-07-19 12:13:38 +0200]: > * Don Armstrong <d...@debian.org> [2016-07-17 17:56:12 -0700]: > > > In response to the helpful comments, I've modified my proposed amendment > > to Nicolas's resolution by adding

Re: Amendment to Proposed GR: Declassifying parts of -private of historical interest

amendment is just a clarification of the intent of my original proposal. I therefore accept this amendment under paragraph A.1.2 of our constitution. Seconds who think otherwise should feel free to submit another amendment. Thanks Don, -- Nicolas Dandrimont BOFH excuse #278: The Dilithium Crystals need to be rotated. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Amendment to Proposed GR: Declassifying parts of -private of historical interest

^ I don't think those words are necessary. > 3. In keeping with paragraph 3 of the Debian Social Contract, Debian >Developers are strongly encouraged to use the debian-private mailing >list only for discussions that should not be disclosed. > > === END GR TEX

Re: Proposed GR: Acknowledge that the debian-private list will remain private

Hi Kurt, * Kurt Roeckx <k...@roeckx.be> [2016-07-16 20:52:03 +0200]: > On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 04:46:04PM +0200, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote: > > * Kurt Roeckx <k...@roeckx.be> [2016-07-08 16:21:32 +0200]: > > > > > On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 03:37:

Re: Proposed GR: Acknowledge that the debian-private list will remain private

* Kurt Roeckx <k...@roeckx.be> [2016-07-08 16:21:32 +0200]: > On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 03:37:08PM +0200, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote: > > === BEGIN GR TEXT === > > > > Title: Acknowledge that the debian-private list will remain private. > > > >

Re: GR Proposal: replace "Chairman" with "Chair" throughout the Debian Constitution

ith "Chair" throughout the Debian Constitution > > All appearances of the word Chairman shall be replaced with the word Chair. > > === END GR TEXT === Seconded. Thanks for bringing this up, -- Nicolas Dandrimont "If you want to travel around the world and be invited to

Re: Proposed GR: Acknowledge that the debian-private list will remain private

move the whole thing and require > another vote if anyone later comes up with a good idea. It simplifies > matters. That's my line of thinking as well. Thanks, -- Nicolas Dandrimont BOFH excuse #344: Network failure - call NBC signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Proposed GR: Acknowledge that the debian-private list will remain private

* Jakub Wilk <jw...@debian.org> [2016-07-07 16:15:44 +0200]: > * Nicolas Dandrimont <ol...@debian.org>, 2016-07-07, 15:37: > >=== BEGIN GR TEXT === > > > >Title: Acknowledge that the debian-private list will remain private. > > > >1. The 2005 General

Proposed GR: Acknowledge that the debian-private list will remain private

iscussions that should not be disclosed. === END GR TEXT === Thanks for your consideration, -- Nicolas Dandrimont (with thanks to all who helped writing this) signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Alternative proposal: reaffirm maintainers technical competence over the software they maintain

or other derived works exist in order to support other init systems in such a way to render software usable to the same extent. [snip] ** End Proposal ** Thank you for bringing this proposal up. Seconded. Cheers, -- Nicolas Dandrimont BOFH excuse #404: Sysadmin accidentally destroyed pager