on of "firmware" here.
Please note in this subthread, that Steve ist talking about ``device
firmware'', whereas this subthread is talking about ``firmware'' in general.
--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
ce of the sourceless ``device firmware'' in question for
your own programms on the ``standalone device''.
In case I'm right: WTF?! Can you please give me some concrete examples
of devices which can be used both as ``peripherial'' as well as
``standalone''?
In
to see
some better rationale for the quoted point (#4) of the proposed amendment.
[1] the case that there we don't have free access to the sources of the
``device firmware''
--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ear wording on this, right.
>> In fact, I'd love to see some better rationale for the quoted point
>> (#4) of the proposed amendment.
>
> I think the rationale behind it is : We want to keep the firmware in
> main, so we say they are not program.
This is the motive, but n
27;restricted'?
--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ian-devel/2007/01/msg00760.html?
I think this proposal needs further discussion.
--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4
pgpu2CB03WSPe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
w, so maybe someone else is faster than me
with moving the Anthony's list along with comments to
http://wiki.debian.org. Thanks!
--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4
pgpmSTUEo9k3J.pgp
Description: PGP signature
l explictly talks about an 'initial
policy'. I read this as that the proposer of that GR expects it to be
changed in near future.
--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
why nobody has come
up to write (and others to second) an admentment which changes the
initial starting policy.
--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
vate archive get declassified I think.
Is this sarcastic or is there some non-obvious relationship?
--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
G-conformant bits from
> the linux-2.6 package in a way that is still making users a priority. It
> instructs the project leader to authorize spending of Debian funds to
> send a box of chocolates to Ben.
> ---
> I belive that Robert's resolution is a waste of time
Secon
firmware) gets voted over option 3 (allow Lenny to release
with any DFSG violations) all these issues have the potential to delay
the lenny release until they are fixed. Is my understanding correct?
--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE
e-decisions as they consider fit, and if necessary
>> | authorize these decisions.
>
> Should you need to propose this, consider it seconded by me.
>
> Should you do a s/acknoledge/acknowledge/ and/or s/therefor/therefore/
> I'll still second it.
I second both Andreas B
gt; contains should be DFSG free.
This is your opinion/interpretation on our foundation documents. Since
Charles obviously doesn't follow here, a vote to determine consensus on
this disagreement seems appropriate.
--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
14 matches
Mail list logo
