On Mon, 05 Jan 2009, MJ Ray wrote:
> Ron wrote:
> > Do you really think it would have been difficult to obtain 2Q seconds
> > for a resolution to recall the previous vote, and postpone it until
> > some of the more obvious glitches had been better ironed out? [...]
>
>
mptively applying the new conditions of this proposal to the vote
for the proposal itself (it's a superset of the existing rules so we
could easily do that by consensus with the final proposer/seconds).
That seems like an easy first test to shake out the fear from the
genuine uncertainty. I
ewhere else.
We can always air them later if a good answer fits in a paragraph ;-)
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 11:50:40PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 07:23:06PM +1030, Ron wrote:
> >Now that we have collaborative tools such as Alioth, which
> >allow any develop
ple up on the rocks just to find out where
they are? Especially when the role is mostly symbolic and
its holder is only able to make small course changes before
people start falling overboard en-mass or plotting a course
of mutiny...
Ok, that's more than enough from me (perhaps more than some
rather then 'open the umbrella'...
Other than that, I think you're getting us close to a working summary
of reality. :-)
Cheers,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The tech edge is here.
http://WSSnzkdzBDebkgptifpwivuvmtscwt.ullifull8.com/?qrxjdhtw
Ron
They after all are the people who's
productivity and good faith we will be messing with -- and they, more
than a handful of spinmeister lobbyists, are the users to whom I
am bound by the contract that is under discussion.
Faithfully, and as pissed at bureaucracy as ever,
Ron
Who
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 06:25:47PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-11 15:24]:
> > My concern is that we find a DPL who is *honest* and *enthusiastic*
> > about the future they see for the project and who is prepared to
> > share t
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 06:25:47PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-11 15:24]:
> > My concern is that we find a DPL who is *honest* and *enthusiastic*
> > about the future they see for the project and who is prepared to
> > share t
nthusiastic about taking it on in
that spirit until someone with a real and brilliant vision to share
comes along again.
Beware then Gergelybrush Nagywood, it is too late to nominate anyone
else, and you might be left holding the body _and_ the tama when the
coroner arrives...
Ron
(who
nthusiastic about taking it on in
that spirit until someone with a real and brilliant vision to share
comes along again.
Beware then Gergelybrush Nagywood, it is too late to nominate anyone
else, and you might be left holding the body _and_ the tama when the
coroner arrives...
Ron
(who
ou say).
I hereby offer a premonition. Overfiend will never be DPL until he
matures enough to become his own asshole again.
(bets or enquiries from the James Randy foundation to private mail
please)
Ron
ou say).
I hereby offer a premonition. Overfiend will never be DPL until he
matures enough to become his own asshole again.
(bets or enquiries from the James Randy foundation to private mail
please)
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#x27;t mean
that we are any lesser for still being only a part of the way along
that road. Our scope is also commensurately greater.
Anyway, this got longer than I might have hoped, but I also don't have
time for onanistic opinion pieces on these lists very often either.
I've got
#x27;t mean
that we are any lesser for still being only a part of the way along
that road. Our scope is also commensurately greater.
Anyway, this got longer than I might have hoped, but I also don't have
time for onanistic opinion pieces on these lists very often either.
I've got
15 matches
Mail list logo
