On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 08:41:35PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> The Debian Project,
>
> affirming its committment to principles of freeness for all works it
> distributes,
>
> but recognizing that changing the Social Contract today would have grave
> consequences for the upcoming stable release
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 08:41:35PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> The Debian Project,
>
> affirming its committment to principles of freeness for all works it
> distributes,
>
> but recognizing that changing the Social Contract today would have grave
> consequences for the upcoming stable release
On 2004-04-28 03:47:04 +0100 Duncan Findlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2. that these amendments, which have already been ratified by the
Debian Project, will be reinstated immediately after the release of
the next stable version of Debian (codenamed sarge), without
further cause for del
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 10:47:04PM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> I wish to propose the following amendment:
> That point 2. above be changed to read:
> 2. that these amendments, which have already been ratified by the
>Debian Project, will be reinstated immediately after the release of
>
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 10:47:04PM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 08:41:35PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > The Debian Project,
> >
> > affirming its committment to principles of freeness for all works it
> > distributes,
> >
> > but recognizing that changing the Social
I second this amended GR. While I understand Steve's concern, I think
that the actual result of sarge not making the September deadline will
be a second GR to push the deadline back again. I'd rather just tie the
changes in wording to Sarge's release and be done with it.
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 a
Hi Duncan!
You wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 08:41:35PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > The Debian Project,
> >
> > affirming its committment to principles of freeness for all works it
> > distributes,
> >
> > but recognizing that changing the Social Contract today would have grave
> > cons
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Duncan Findlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 08:41:35PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> The Debian Project,
>>
>> affirming its committment to principles of freeness for all works it
>> distributes,
>>
>> but recognizing that
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 10:47:04PM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> I wish to propose the following amendment:
>
> That point 2. above be changed to read:
>
> 2. that these amendments, which have already been ratified by the
>Debian Project, will be reinstated immediately after the release of
>
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 04:05:24AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> On 2004-04-28 03:47:04 +0100 Duncan Findlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >2. that these amendments, which have already been ratified by the
> > Debian Project, will be reinstated immediately after the release of
> > the next stable ve
On 2004-04-28 03:47:04 +0100 Duncan Findlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2. that these amendments, which have already been ratified by the
Debian Project, will be reinstated immediately after the release of
the next stable version of Debian (codenamed sarge), without
further cause for delib
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 10:47:04PM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> I wish to propose the following amendment:
> That point 2. above be changed to read:
> 2. that these amendments, which have already been ratified by the
>Debian Project, will be reinstated immediately after the release of
>
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 10:47:04PM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 08:41:35PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > The Debian Project,
> >
> > affirming its committment to principles of freeness for all works it
> > distributes,
> >
> > but recognizing that changing the Social
I second this amended GR. While I understand Steve's concern, I think
that the actual result of sarge not making the September deadline will
be a second GR to push the deadline back again. I'd rather just tie the
changes in wording to Sarge's release and be done with it.
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 a
Hi Duncan!
You wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 08:41:35PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > The Debian Project,
> >
> > affirming its committment to principles of freeness for all works it
> > distributes,
> >
> > but recognizing that changing the Social Contract today would have grave
> > cons
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Duncan Findlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 08:41:35PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> The Debian Project,
>>
>> affirming its committment to principles of freeness for all works it
>> distributes,
>>
>> but recognizing that
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 10:47:04PM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> I wish to propose the following amendment:
>
> That point 2. above be changed to read:
>
> 2. that these amendments, which have already been ratified by the
>Debian Project, will be reinstated immediately after the release of
>
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 04:05:24AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> On 2004-04-28 03:47:04 +0100 Duncan Findlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >2. that these amendments, which have already been ratified by the
> > Debian Project, will be reinstated immediately after the release of
> > the next stable ve
18 matches
Mail list logo
