> "Russ" == Russ Allbery writes:
Russ> Apologies for not having followed up on this message yet. I
Russ> got rather busy with non-Debian things for a bit.
Russ> To provide a status update, I think Kurt identified several
Russ> significant issues and we need another revision.
Hi,
On Wed, 08 Dec 2021, Russ Allbery wrote:
> * Should we say that the proposers of ballot options need to provide the
> short summaries at the end of the discussion period, or should we
> specify that the Project Secretary writes them?
I think it has always been a mix of both that has been
Apologies for not having followed up on this message yet. I got rather
busy with non-Debian things for a bit.
To provide a status update, I think Kurt identified several significant
issues and we need another revision. I hope to finish that soon, at least
by next weekend if not sooner.
There ar
> "Russ" == Russ Allbery writes:
>>> 7. Proposing a general resolution.
>>>
>>> When the Technical Committee proposes a general resolution or a
>>> ballot option in a general resolution to the project under point
>>> 4.2.1, it may delegate the authority to withdraw, amend,
Thank you very much for the review!
Kurt Roeckx writes:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 07:25:45PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>>6. If a vote is canceled under point 6.3.1.4 later than 13 days
>> after the initial proposed resolution, the vote specified in
>> point 6.3.1.5 i
On 2021-11-30 at 17:36, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 07:25:45PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> 3. Minor changes to ballot options under point A.1.5 may not be made
>>after or within 24 hours of the end of the discussion period unless
>>the Project Secretary agr
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 07:25:45PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Section 6.3
> ---
>
> Replace 6.3.1 in its entirety with:
>
> 1. Resolution process.
>
>The Technical Committee uses the following process to prepare a
>resolution for vote:
>
>1. Any member of t
Hello,
I too would like to second the following quoted proposal. Thanks Russ.
On Thu 25 Nov 2021 at 07:25PM -08, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Here is an updated version of my proposal, which incorporates the formal
> amendment to change the default option for TC resolutions to also be "None
> of the a
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 07:25:45PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Here is an updated version of my proposal, which incorporates the formal
> amendment to change the default option for TC resolutions to also be "None
> of the above" and fixes two typos.
I've updated the website and changed the start
On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 08:19:26AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Timo Röhling writes:
>
> > I was under the impression that this amendment by the original
> > proposer does not require re-sponsoring, and my consent is
> > implicitly assumed unless I choose to object. Am I wrong?
>
> > (If I am, c
> "Russ" == Russ Allbery writes:
Russ> Here is an updated version of my proposal, which incorporates
Russ> the formal amendment to change the default option for TC
Russ> resolutions to also be "None of the above" and fixes two
Russ> typos.
I still support this and my second s
Russ Allbery dijo [Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 08:19:26AM -0800]:
> > I was under the impression that this amendment by the original
> > proposer does not require re-sponsoring, and my consent is
> > implicitly assumed unless I choose to object. Am I wrong?
>
> > (If I am, consider this my sponsoring of
Thanks, Russ.
Seconded.
Russ Allbery dijo [Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 07:25:45PM -0800]:
> Here is an updated version of my proposal, which incorporates the formal
> amendment to change the default option for TC resolutions to also be "None
> of the above" and fixes two typos.
>
>
> Rationale
> =
Timo Röhling writes:
> I was under the impression that this amendment by the original
> proposer does not require re-sponsoring, and my consent is
> implicitly assumed unless I choose to object. Am I wrong?
> (If I am, consider this my sponsoring of the amended version)
That's also my understan
I second this.
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 07:25:45PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Section 4.2.4
> -
>
> Strike the sentence "The minimum discussion period is 2 weeks, but may be
> varied by up to 1 week by the Project Leader." (A modified version of
> this provision is added to section
* Pierre-Elliott Bécue [2021-11-26 09:49]:
Seconded.
I was under the impression that this amendment by the original
proposer does not require re-sponsoring, and my consent is
implicitly assumed unless I choose to object. Am I wrong?
(If I am, consider this my sponsoring of the amended version)
Russ Allbery wrote on 26/11/2021 at 04:25:45+0100:
> [[PGP Signed Part:No public key for 7D80315C5736DE75 created at
> 2021-11-26T04:25:45+0100 using RSA]]
> Here is an updated version of my proposal, which incorporates the formal
> amendment to change the default option for TC resolutions to a
Here is an updated version of my proposal, which incorporates the formal
amendment to change the default option for TC resolutions to also be "None
of the above" and fixes two typos.
Rationale
=
We have uncovered several problems with the current constitutional
mechanism for preparing a
18 matches
Mail list logo
