On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 05:01:25PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (o...@debian.org) [150831 11:23]:
> > Le lundi, 31 août 2015, 11.04:59 Axel Beckert a écrit :
>
> > > As far as I understand this would mean proposing an alternative choice
> > > for the voter. In that case, th
On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 02:43:04PM +, Sam Hartman wrote:
> In conclusion, endless discussion is not a win. And I think this
> strategic voting fix may bring us there. If I were to put together an
> amendment that fixed the strictly greater issue but did not tackle the
> strategic voting issue
On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 02:43:04PM +, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Kurt> The solution to this problem is moving the majority check
> Kurt> later in the process, so that option B would have been dropped
> Kurt> first. If they did this stratigic voting in that case both
> Kurt> options w
> "Kurt" == Kurt Roeckx writes:
Kurt> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 04:49:08PM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
Kurt> One of the problems, and I consider that to be the most
Kurt> important one, is about the stratigic vote that you can do.
Kurt> For example, condiser that there ar
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 09:47:47AM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx writes:
>
> > The solution to this problem is moving the majority check later
> > in the process, so that option B would have been dropped first.
> > If they did this stratigic voting in that case both options would
>
Kurt Roeckx writes:
> The solution to this problem is moving the majority check later
> in the process, so that option B would have been dropped first.
> If they did this stratigic voting in that case both options would
> have been dropped.
Interesting -- one thought: haven't voting systems been
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 04:49:08PM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 31 August 2015 at 08:06, Kurt Roeckx - Debian Project Secretary
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > A new GR has been started to update the Standard Resolution
> > Procedure. Details about it can be found on:
> > https://w
Russ Allbery writes:
> Dimitri John Ledkov writes:
>> I'm failing to understand the current situation, nor proposed changes.
>> Can someone please give a plain English explanation and/or examples?
>> E.g. committee of size N is voting on an issue I which happens to be
>> overriding developer. T
Dimitri John Ledkov writes:
> I'm failing to understand the current situation, nor proposed changes.
> Can someone please give a plain English explanation and/or examples?
> E.g. committee of size N is voting on an issue I which happens to be
> overriding developer. The votes are F for, A agains
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> On 31 August 2015 at 08:06, Kurt Roeckx - Debian Project Secretary
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > A new GR has been started to update the Standard Resolution
> > Procedure. Details about it can be found on:
> > https://www.debian.org/vote/2015/vote_002
Hello,
On 31 August 2015 at 08:06, Kurt Roeckx - Debian Project Secretary
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A new GR has been started to update the Standard Resolution
> Procedure. Details about it can be found on:
> https://www.debian.org/vote/2015/vote_002
>
I'm failing to understand the current situation, no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (o...@debian.org) [150831 11:23]:
> Le lundi, 31 août 2015, 11.04:59 Axel Beckert a écrit :
> > As far as I understand this would mean proposing an alternative choice
> > for the voter. In that case, the damage is already done a
Hi Didier,
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Le lundi, 31 août 2015, 11.04:59 Axel Beckert a écrit :
> > I would have preferred if "off-by-one" would have been used instead of
> > "fencepost" as in the subject of the original GR proposal. That term
> > is later missing in the announcement by Kurt as w
Andreas: GR amendment proposal below.
Le lundi, 31 août 2015, 11.04:59 Axel Beckert a écrit :
> I would have preferred if "off-by-one" would have been used instead of
> "fencepost" as in the subject of the original GR proposal. That term
> is later missing in the announcement by Kurt as well as on
Hi,
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Le lundi, 31 août 2015, 10.26:18 Axel Beckert a écrit :
> > Kurt Roeckx - Debian Project Secretary wrote:
> > > https://www.debian.org/vote/2015/vote_002
> >
> > Please either do not use the word combination "fencepost bug" at all
> > or explain its meaning.
>
>
Hi Axel,
(CC'ing aba, as GR proposer).
Le lundi, 31 août 2015, 10.26:18 Axel Beckert a écrit :
> Kurt Roeckx - Debian Project Secretary wrote:
> > https://www.debian.org/vote/2015/vote_002
>
> Please either do not use the word combination "fencepost bug" at all
> or explain its meaning.
These w
also sprach Axel Beckert [2015-08-31 10:26 +0200]:
> Please either do not use the word combination "fencepost bug" at all
> or explain its meaning.
>
> As far as I could find out it refers to a political joke (!) in the
> USA comparing a "fencepost turtle" to e.g. George W. Bush or Sarah
> Palin.
Hi,
Kurt Roeckx - Debian Project Secretary wrote:
> https://www.debian.org/vote/2015/vote_002
Please either do not use the word combination "fencepost bug" at all
or explain its meaning.
As far as I could find out it refers to a political joke (!) in the
USA comparing a "fencepost turtle" to e.g
18 matches
Mail list logo