Re: Namespaces, was: summary of software licenses in non-free

2004-01-19 Thread Michael Banck
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 12:22:55PM +, MJ Ray wrote: > The statistics summary by John Goerzen on vote (which you replied to) > suggested that at least 18% of popcon users are using a non-Debian > source, as we don't have j2re1.4. Is over a sixth a large fraction? > Depends on what you mean by

Re: Namespaces, was: summary of software licenses in non-free

2004-01-19 Thread Hamish Moffatt
Please obey the Mail-Followup-To header. On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 12:22:55PM +, MJ Ray wrote: > I'm glad that you aggree that some things are better not in the > project's hosting. I didn't say nor imply that. There are certainly some things we cannot host at all for one reason or anything.

Re: Namespaces, was: summary of software licenses in non-free

2004-01-19 Thread Michael Banck
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 12:22:55PM +, MJ Ray wrote: > The statistics summary by John Goerzen on vote (which you replied to) > suggested that at least 18% of popcon users are using a non-Debian > source, as we don't have j2re1.4. Is over a sixth a large fraction? > Depends on what you mean by

Re: Namespaces, was: summary of software licenses in non-free

2004-01-19 Thread MJ Ray
On 2004-01-13 12:38:57 + Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think are you exaggerating a bit there. I doubt that a large fraction of our users are using any non-Debian repositories. Of course I don't have evidence so if you have any contrary to this I'd be pleased to see it. The

Re: Namespaces, was: summary of software licenses in non-free

2004-01-19 Thread Hamish Moffatt
Please obey the Mail-Followup-To header. On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 12:22:55PM +, MJ Ray wrote: > I'm glad that you aggree that some things are better not in the > project's hosting. I didn't say nor imply that. There are certainly some things we cannot host at all for one reason or anything.

Re: Namespaces, was: summary of software licenses in non-free

2004-01-19 Thread MJ Ray
On 2004-01-13 12:38:57 + Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think are you exaggerating a bit there. I doubt that a large fraction of our users are using any non-Debian repositories. Of course I don't have evidence so if you have any contrary to this I'd be pleased to see it. The stat

Re: Namespaces, was: summary of software licenses in non-free

2004-01-14 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
On Jan 13, 2004, at 07:38, Hamish Moffatt wrote: I think are you exaggerating a bit there. I doubt that a large fraction of our users are using any non-Debian repositories. Of course I don't have evidence so if you have any contrary to this I'd be pleased to see it. The popcon results posted t

Re: Namespaces, was: summary of software licenses in non-free

2004-01-14 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
On Jan 13, 2004, at 07:38, Hamish Moffatt wrote: I think are you exaggerating a bit there. I doubt that a large fraction of our users are using any non-Debian repositories. Of course I don't have evidence so if you have any contrary to this I'd be pleased to see it. The popcon results posted to -vo

Re: Namespaces, was: summary of software licenses in non-free

2004-01-13 Thread Andreas Metzler
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 05:39:05PM +, MJ Ray wrote: >> On 2004-01-10 15:34:15 + Theodore Ts'o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >My advice? Keep everything centralized in a >> >debian.org-hosted non-free section; life will be much, much, >> >***much

Re: Namespaces, was: summary of software licenses in non-free

2004-01-13 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 05:39:05PM +, MJ Ray wrote: > On 2004-01-10 15:34:15 + Theodore Ts'o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >My advice? Keep everything centralized in a > >debian.org-hosted non-free section; life will be much, much, > >***much*** simpler. > > As you point out earlier in

Re: Namespaces, was: summary of software licenses in non-free

2004-01-13 Thread Andreas Metzler
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 05:39:05PM +, MJ Ray wrote: >> On 2004-01-10 15:34:15 + Theodore Ts'o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >My advice? Keep everything centralized in a >> >debian.org-hosted non-free section; life will be much, much, >> >***much

Re: Namespaces, was: summary of software licenses in non-free

2004-01-13 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 05:39:05PM +, MJ Ray wrote: > On 2004-01-10 15:34:15 + Theodore Ts'o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >My advice? Keep everything centralized in a > >debian.org-hosted non-free section; life will be much, much, > >***much*** simpler. > > As you point out earlier in

Re: Namespaces, was: summary of software licenses in non-free

2004-01-10 Thread Sven Luther
On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 05:39:05PM +, MJ Ray wrote: > On 2004-01-10 15:34:15 + Theodore Ts'o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >My advice? Keep everything centralized in a > >debian.org-hosted non-free section; life will be much, much, > >***much*** simpler. > > As you point out earlier in

Re: Namespaces, was: summary of software licenses in non-free

2004-01-10 Thread Sven Luther
On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 05:39:05PM +, MJ Ray wrote: > On 2004-01-10 15:34:15 + Theodore Ts'o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >My advice? Keep everything centralized in a > >debian.org-hosted non-free section; life will be much, much, > >***much*** simpler. > > As you point out earlier in

Namespaces, was: summary of software licenses in non-free

2004-01-10 Thread MJ Ray
On 2004-01-10 15:34:15 + Theodore Ts'o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: My advice? Keep everything centralized in a debian.org-hosted non-free section; life will be much, much, ***much*** simpler. As you point out earlier in your email, we already have this problem. I suspect it will get worse

Namespaces, was: summary of software licenses in non-free

2004-01-10 Thread MJ Ray
On 2004-01-10 15:34:15 + Theodore Ts'o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: My advice? Keep everything centralized in a debian.org-hosted non-free section; life will be much, much, ***much*** simpler. As you point out earlier in your email, we already have this problem. I suspect it will get worse. As