On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 10:49:26PM +0900, Seo Sanghyeon wrote:
> The Debian Free Software Guidelines states that "The program must
> include source code".
>
> 1. How do you define "source code" yourself?
Any definition of source code, to be useful to the Debian Project in
applying our Free Softwa
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 02:15:00PM -0800, Jonathan Walther wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 10:49:26PM +0900, Seo Sanghyeon wrote:
> >1. How do you define "source code" yourself?
>
> Like pornography, I know "source code" when I see it. There may be some
> edge cases where not everyone agrees wha
Seo Sanghyeon wrote:
The Debian Free Software Guidelines states that "The program must
include source code".
1. How do you define "source code" yourself?
It means different things in different contexts; for Debian's purposes
it means the stuff you need to modify then compile to produce the stuff
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 10:49:26PM +0900, Seo Sanghyeon wrote:
1. How do you define "source code" yourself?
Like pornography, I know "source code" when I see it. There may be some
edge cases where not everyone agrees what constitutes source code, but
porn is like that too. Where do you draw the l
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 10:49:26PM +0900, Seo Sanghyeon wrote:
> The Debian Free Software Guidelines states that "The program must
> include source code".
[...]
Your questions point out an interesting legal area which is still
under discussion in large parts of the FOSS world. An common
agreement
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 06.03.2005, 15:10 + schrieb Matthew Garrett:
> > 6. Which of the following satisfies DFSG #2? What is the general
> >principle? Or should it be case-by-case?
>
> I'm not going to get into a case-by-case discussion, because I don't
> believe it to be interesting or rele
Seo Sanghyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. How do you define "source code" yourself?
I believe that source code is anything that allows us to learn how the
software works and modify it to function in different ways. In almost
all cases, the GPL's "preferred form for modification" will be sourc
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 12:44:44AM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 05.03.2005, 23:11 + schrieb Andrew Suffield:
> > On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 03:30:14PM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
> > > Indeed, I would be reluctant to vote for any candiate who would commit
> > > to twenty-four
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 05.03.2005, 23:11 + schrieb Andrew Suffield:
> On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 03:30:14PM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
> > Indeed, I would be reluctant to vote for any candiate who would commit
> > to twenty-four definite answers as part of his campaign, no matter
> > what the ans
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 03:30:14PM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Indeed, I would be reluctant to vote for any candiate who would commit
> to twenty-four definite answers as part of his campaign, no matter
> what the answers were.
Or, for that matter, one who couldn't spot the fairly big hole in
Ha! This gets the official "best question so far" award. Especially the neural
network bit. That's rich.
On Saturday 05 March 2005 7:49 am, Seo Sanghyeon wrote:
> 6. Which of the following satisfies DFSG #2? What is the general
>principle? Or should it be case-by-case?
>
> * ELF binary witho
Scripsit Seo Sanghyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 6. Which of the following satisfies DFSG #2? What is the general
>principle? Or should it be case-by-case?
[snip TWENTY-FOUR semi-concrete examples]
However relevant and interesting it would be to get the candidates'
general opinion about the DFSG
The Debian Free Software Guidelines states that "The program must
include source code".
1. How do you define "source code" yourself?
2. I think that people have different ideas of what "source code" means.
Do you agree? Are there significant disagreements regarding this
issue within the Debi
13 matches
Mail list logo
