On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 06:47:53AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
Agreed, but would you agree that it is a core part of the role of the
DPL/2IC, or indeed any mediator, to provide at least basic status and
progress info to the project as a whole?
Yes, absolutely. Beside this specific case---which
Dear Margarita and Stefano,
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 04:03:00PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
[snip]
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 05:30:50PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
[snip]
Thank you for your replies. I am glad that you care about this issue,
and have voiced your opinion on how to handle
Le Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 06:27:00PM -0500, Kumar Appaiah a écrit :
My question to you is, do you envision a role for the DPL in fixing
such inadequate maintenance of important packages.
Hello Kumar,
for the moment, you have taken the way of the Technical Comitee, and this does
not require the
Hi Kumar,
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 06:27:00PM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Dear Candidates,
First of all, I wish you all the very best for the elections!
At the outset, this question is not meant to be inflammatory or to
express ire at a particular individual or set of individuals involved;
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 02:57:59AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
One of the questions which I've not yet seen exactly in the
discussions is on the transparency in the maintenance of non-core but
important packages, such as python, wherein the maintenance of the
package and policy (till a
Dear Charles,
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 09:23:25AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
for the moment, you have taken the way of the Technical Comitee, and this does
not require the intervention of the DPL. Asking the TC to solve a disagreement
between two parties should be the occasion to write down
Kumar Appaiah a.ku...@alumni.iitm.ac.in writes:
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 02:57:59AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
I don't wish to comment on the specific case of python packaging.
There's been lots of things going on there, and though some of it was
in public, the thread you point to clearly
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 08:05:40PM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 02:57:59AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
One of the questions which I've not yet seen exactly in the
discussions is on the transparency in the maintenance of non-core but
important packages, such as
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Discussing problems in public works very well if two people like
eachother. If they don't, however, you get two people cursing at
eachother. Now there are some people who really don't mind doing that in
public; but when things get messy, not being messy out in the open
Le Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 06:47:53AM +0200, Frans Pop a écrit :
Also, it has been claimed we cannot provide any information because
discussions are in private [1]. Do candidates agree to that, or do they
think that a DPL should make clear to parties in advance that the project
will be kept
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Kumar Appaiah
a.ku...@alumni.iitm.ac.in wrote:
My question to you is, do you envision a role for the DPL in fixing
such inadequate maintenance of important packages, or are you of the
opinion that is it up to the affected Debian community to stop
whining and
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 06:27:00PM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
First of all, I wish you all the very best for the elections!
Hi Kumar, thanks a lot!
This has led some parts of the community (Debian Python, in this
case) to knock the doors of the tech-ctte[1] (recommended reading,
unless you
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 16:51, Stefano Zacchiroli z...@debian.org wrote:
...
unfortunately some of the involved parties did not reply to the
offer.
Not some, just one: the Python maintainer. (as said in the bug log.)
Regards,
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website:
Dear Zack,
Thanks for the response.
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 04:51:52PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
My question to you is, do you envision a role for the DPL in fixing
such inadequate maintenance of important packages, or are you of the
opinion that is it up to the affected Debian
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 09:59:08AM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
The method adopted for resolution of this conflict has, for better or
for worse, happened behind-the-scenes. Now, some in the project feel
that this is the best way to avoid a conflagration of sorts, but
others feel that this back
15 matches
Mail list logo
