Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 01:48:44PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: [...]
Personally, I expect soc-ctte to do something to support the existing
situation when they think it's fair overall. We've seen situations
where doing nothing has allowed complaints to fester.
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 01:48:44PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
I assumed that soc-ctte would intervene somehow on any issue referred
to them, even if it is just to say let the existing processes stand.
If it ends up at soc-ctte, there is a problem to resolve.
[...]
What should be soc-ctte's
Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 11:02:09AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: [...]
I assumed that soc-ctte would intervene somehow on any issue referred
to them, even if it is just to say let the existing processes stand.
If it ends up at soc-ctte, there is a problem to
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It depends. Being able to reach consensus may make it easier for the
soc-ctte to look at the situation and go there's strong disagreement here
and even if we're mostly on one side, we realize that and we should decide
that we can't really intervene.
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 11:02:09AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It depends. Being able to reach consensus may make it easier for the
soc-ctte to look at the situation and go there's strong disagreement
here and even if we're mostly on one side, we realize that
5 matches
Mail list logo
