Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 157375 ITP: wxglade -- GUI designer for wxWidgets/wxPython/wxPerl
Bug#157375: RFP: wxglade -- GUI designer for wxPython
Changed Bug title.
owner 157375 !
Bug#157375: ITP: wxglade -- GUI designer for wxWidgets/wxPython/wxPerl
Owner recorded as
retitle 157375 ITP: wxglade -- GUI designer for wxWidgets/wxPython/wxPerl
owner 157375 !
thanks
Igor, are you still interested in wxGlade packaing?
In the meantime, I uploaded a package to mentors.debian.net. Add
following lines to your sources.list to get it:
deb
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: mozilla-firefox-locale-ru
Version : 0.8
Upstream Author : Alexander Slovesnik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : ftp://ftp.altlinux.ru/pub/people/fattie/firefox/
* License : MPL (???)
Description : Mozilla Firefox
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: libip-country-perl
Version : 2.17
Upstream Author : Name [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL : http://search.cpan.org/~nwetters/IP-Country-2.17/
License : Perl Artistic (I assume...)
Description : IP::Country perl
At Sun, 23 May 2004 22:47:34 +0200,
Johannes Berg wrote:
Upstream Author : Chuan-kai Lin [EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~linchuan/wipe2fs/
Not found. http://www.cse.ogi.edu/~linchuan/wipe2fs/
Regards,
-- gotom
A virus or potentially harmful code was detected in the following message:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Your software
Quarantine Area: Virus Detected
The integrity of the message could not be verified so it was not sent and has
been quarantined for deletion.
Hi,
How is ndiswrapper packaging going? I'm currently using your 0.7-1
packages, and noticed a few problems:
- If you untar /usr/src/ndiswrapper-source.tar.gz, cd into
modules/ndiswrapper, and run make, the build fails because it can't find
../version. The version file is in the current
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 249834 O: netleds-applet -- GNOME network LEDs applet (woody only)
Bug#249834: O: netleds-applet --
Changed Bug title.
retitle 249833 O: xpm -- X PixMap library, compiled with libc5 (woody only)
Bug#249833: O: xpm4.7 --
Changed Bug title.
What is the current status of Leo packaging? Leo progressed to 4.1
in the meantime. (Not that 3.10 wasn't great. But 4.1 is much
more great!)
I used to be a happy user of Leo on Windows, so I want to see Leo
packaged for Debian.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 244238 O: netsaint-nrpe -- NetSaint remote plugin executor (plugin)
Bug#244238: ITA: netsaint-nrpe -- NetSaint remote plugin executor (plugin)
Changed Bug title.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 231667 +pending
Bug#231667: Patch to add Apache 2 support and other useful mods
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
tag 243995 +pending
Bug#243995: libapache-mod-auth-mysql: Documentation error
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
tag
Xavier, what is the status of packaging leo?
Seo: I don't know, I've forwarded your inquiry to the person stating his
intention to package this. Note that that was in December 2002, so a
long time ago.
Please note that no package will get in Debian unless somebody is
interested in packaging and
Featuring unbeatable prescription savings and nice site design.
If you take any type of meds, you need to check your pricing here.
We ship daily via Registered Mail, so you will receive your order promptly.
Sincerely,
Edwina Ritzer
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libetpan
Version : 0.32.cvs.20040522
Upstream Author : Dinh Viet Hoa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://libetpan.sourceforge.net/
* License : BSD
Description : LibEtPan! - a mail library
LibEtPan! is a mail
On Mon, 24 May 2004 11:33:11 +0200
Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Xavier, what is the status of packaging leo?
I have never got any answer to my ITP (I am not a Debian developer, so
I needed someone to review my package and sponsor it), I just gave up.
If someone is willing to
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 02:12:02PM +0200, Xavier Antoviaque wrote:
On Mon, 24 May 2004 11:33:11 +0200
Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Xavier, what is the status of packaging leo?
I have never got any answer to my ITP (I am not a Debian developer, so
I needed someone to
On Mon, 24 May 2004 14:20:19 +0200
Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You don't get automatically an answer to a ITP. You'll need to go look
for a sponsor pro-actively, for example by mailing to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] See
http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html
Yes,
Your message dated Mon, 24 May 2004 14:53:16 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line already packaged
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I am not using this package anymore and I don't have the time to
maintain this package properly. Please someone adopt it.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (99, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I am not using this package anymore and I don't have the time to
maintain this package properly. Please someone adopt it.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (99, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I am not using this package anymore and I don't have the time to
maintain this package properly. Please someone adopt it.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (99, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I am not using this package anymore and I don't have the time to
maintain this package properly. Please someone adopt it.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (99, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I am not using this package anymore and I don't have the time to
maintain this package properly. Please someone adopt it.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (99, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I am not using this package anymore and I don't have the time to
maintain this package properly. Please someone adopt it.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (99, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I am not using this package anymore and I don't have the time to
maintain this package properly. Please someone adopt it.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (99, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I am not using this package anymore and I don't have the time to
maintain this package properly. Please someone adopt it.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (99, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I am not using this package anymore and I don't have the time to
maintain this package properly. Please someone adopt it.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (99, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I am not using this package anymore and I don't have the time to
maintain this package properly. Please someone adopt it.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (99, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I am not using this package anymore and I don't have the time to
maintain this package properly. Please someone adopt it.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (99, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I am not using this package anymore and I don't have the time to
maintain this package properly. Please someone adopt it.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (99, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I am not using this package anymore and I don't have the time to
maintain this package properly. Please someone adopt it.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (99, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I am not using this package anymore and I don't have the time to
maintain this package properly. Please someone adopt it.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (99, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
retitle 135745 ITP : libbtparse -- A C library to access BibTeX files
thanks
Well, after many delays, I am submitting the package...
Regis
On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 08:04:05PM +0100, Xavier Antoviaque wrote:
Hello,
I try to use the convention proposed by Rob Bradford a few weeks ago.
Package name: leo
Version : 3.10
License : Python licence
Upstream Author : Edward K. Ream [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Upstream URL
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 10:08:51PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 08:04:05PM +0100, Xavier Antoviaque wrote:
Hello,
I try to use the convention proposed by Rob Bradford a few weeks ago.
Package name: leo
Version : 3.10
License :
On Mon, 24 May 2004 22:08:51 +0200
Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some remarks, not that I'm not a Debian Developer (yet), but before
leo can be included in Debian, these issues need to be resolved anyway
Thanks for your reply, its helps a lot.
I repackaged leo, I hope it
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 12:24:16AM +0200, Xavier Antoviaque wrote:
On Mon, 24 May 2004 22:08:51 +0200
Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some remarks, not that I'm not a Debian Developer (yet), but before
leo can be included in Debian, these issues need to be resolved anyway
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
owner 250613 !
Bug#250613: ITP: libip-country-perl -- IP::Country perl modules for guessing
country codes from IP address
Owner recorded as Florian Ragwitz [EMAIL PROTECTED].
End
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
retitle 250613 ITP: libip-country-perl -- IP::Country perl modules for
guessing country codes from IP address
Bug#250613: RFP: libip-country-perl -- IP::Country perl modules for
Hi,
I'll package IP::Country as soon as possible. But maybe it won't be as
ease as you thought. The Module itself is free, but the databases it
uses aren't. So the package needs to be in the contrib section and
download the databases not during the build-process, like the upstream
author
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: phetail
Version : 0.6
Upstream Author : Jesper Noehr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://code.printf.dk/~decius/phetail/
* License : Artistic
Description : realtime SQL-logger for amavisd-new
tails
41 matches
Mail list logo
