Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 337944 ITA: mon -- monitor hosts/services/whatever and alert about
> problems
Bug#337944: ITA: mon -- monitor hosts/services/whatever and alert
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assis
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 337944 ITA: mon -- monitor hosts/services/whatever and alert
Bug#337944: O: mon -- monitor hosts/services/whatever and alert about problems
Changed Bug title.
> about problems
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> owner 337944 !
Japanese Language Pack of SeaMonkey 1.0.x
http://sourceforge.jp/projects/rm-f/files/?release_id=23209#23209
For the moment, Japanese Language Pack of official recognition does not exist.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTE
Le Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 12:13:26PM +0100, Luca Capello a écrit :
>
> I was wondering if having two packages with only one or two files [1]
> was worth it, because in this case we have 4 times [2] the same
> changelog.gz, changelog.Debian.gz, copyright and README.
Dear Luca,
If the lib package sh
On Thursday 08 February 2007 08:49, Emmanuel Bouthenot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When did you plan to upload this package ?
>
> cheers,
I'm quite busy at this time and i'm waiting for a patch from Upstream author.
As soon as i get this patch i'll look for a sponsor.
Friendly
Francesco
--
:wq
--
To U
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 405718 pending
Bug#405718: ITP: freedict-kur-tur -- Dict package for Kurdish-Turkish Freedict
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 405930 pending
Bug#405930: ITP: freedict-kur-
Your message dated Thu, 08 Feb 2007 22:26:17 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#401815: fixed in yui 0.12.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 08 Feb 2007 22:47:13 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#404745: fixed in buxon 0.0.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 351082
Bug#351082: RFP: funkload -- functional and load web tester
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Xavier Oswald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libauthen-krb5-simple-perl
Version : 0.32
Upstream Author : Damien S. Stuart, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/D/DS/DSTUART/Authen-Krb5-Simple-0.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Xavier Oswald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libauthen-simple-kerberos-perl
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Christian Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/C/CH/CHANSEN/Authen-Simple-Kerb
Your message dated Thu, 08 Feb 2007 11:59:56 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 08 Feb 2007 11:59:39 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 08 Feb 2007 11:59:40 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 08 Feb 2007 11:59:39 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 08 Feb 2007 11:59:56 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 08 Feb 2007 11:59:56 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 08 Feb 2007 11:59:56 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 08 Feb 2007 11:59:55 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 08 Feb 2007 11:59:40 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 08 Feb 2007 11:59:39 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 08 Feb 2007 11:59:55 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Hello!
This is for bug readers and d-d's information.
On Thu, 08 Feb 2007 14:24:55 +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> * Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-08 12:04]:
>
>> On Thu, 08 Feb 2007 01:38:42 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
>> > Please do not include it in the lib package, it's a pain
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Brett Bode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: wxmacmolplt
Version : 6.3.0
Upstream Author : Brett Bode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.scl.ameslab.gov/MacMolPlt/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Descripti
Steve Greenland a écrit :
> On 02-Feb-07, 01:08 (CST), Vincent Danjean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Package: wnpp
>> Severity: wishlist
>> Owner: Vincent Danjean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> * Package name: hgview
>> Version : not yet released
>> Upstream Author : Ludovic Aubry <[EMA
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 408258 ITP: ipp2p -- netfilter/iptables module to identify
> peer-to-peer (P2P) data in IP traffic
Bug#408258: RFP: ipp2p -- netfilter/iptables module to identify peer-to-peer
(P2P) data in IP traffic
Changed Bug title.
> owner 408258 Rasmus
Package: wnpp
Owner: Milan Zamazal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: cl-flexichain
Version : 1.2
Upstream Author : Robert Strandh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthieu Villeneuve
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL or Web page : http://www.cliki.net/Flexichain
* License
Your message dated Thu, 08 Feb 2007 11:32:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#407654: fixed in slidentd 1.0.0-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Hi,
2006 m. December 18 d., Monday, Ludovic RESLINGER rašė:
> Actually I'm try to solve a bug with another of my packages, I began to
> make packaging of moodbar, but I didn't finish it.
> Please, be patient, it will be do in a few time, don't worry.
Any progress on the package? Almost 3 months is
David Smith wrote:
> Sorry for going back and forth but please take another look
> again,
good, uploaded, thanks.
if you want/need further sponsoring, don't hesiate to ask me again.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Interne
Hello!
Please keep d-d in the cc: header.
On Thu, 08 Feb 2007 09:28:33 +0100, Marcus Better wrote:
>> libpam-thinkfinger (depends on libthinkfinger0)
>> libthinkfinger0
>> libthinkfinger-dev
>> thinkfinger (depends on libpam-thinkfinger)
>
> (What is the thinkfinger package for, if the tool is in
Hello!
On Thu, 08 Feb 2007 01:38:42 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Please do not include it in the lib package, it's a pain afterwards
> when a new version with a different soname is introduced and
> disallows parallel installation of those.
With my non-yet-skilled-library packager hat on, I don't
Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Smith wrote:
>> Heh, let's try that one more time. I've reuploaded to mentors
>> and I've verified the same package from my personal archive at
>> http://bosabosa.org/~dds/debian/ . If mentors is still fubared
>> please try the bosabosa archive.
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 405931 pending
Bug#405931: ITP: freedict-kur-deu -- Dict package for Kurdish-German Freedict
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 408287 pending
Bug#408287: ITP: keyjnotegui --
Hello!
On Thu, 08 Feb 2007 10:38:08 +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
> Luca Capello wrote:
>> ATM I don't really see any reason to create a separate package just
>> for tf-tool, because libthinkfinger + tf-tool (binary and manpage)
>> should generate a package around less than 50K in size. In case
>> ne
On Thursday 08 February 2007, Sebastian Harl wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Sebastian Harl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: schafkopf
> Upstream Author : Dominik Seichter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://schafkopf.berlios.de/
> * License :
Luca Capello wrote:
ATM I don't really see any reason to create a separate package just
for tf-tool, because libthinkfinger + tf-tool (binary and manpage)
should generate a package around less than 50K in size. In case new
tools will be added, we can split the package.
Is a strong reason agains
David Smith wrote:
> Heh, let's try that one more time. I've reuploaded to mentors
> and I've verified the same package from my personal archive at
> http://bosabosa.org/~dds/debian/ . If mentors is still fubared
> please try the bosabosa archive.
still wrong on both sites:
the one in debian:
59b
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sebastian Harl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: schafkopf
Upstream Author : Dominik Seichter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://schafkopf.berlios.de/
* License : GPL
Description : a popular Bavarian card game
This is a KDE
Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Smith wrote:
>> I agree using dpatch is better so I've made the appropriate
>> changes and reuploaded. I'm a big fan of darcs and am
>> evaluating darcs-buildpackage but for now, just using dpatch is
>> definitely better than directly modifying th
> libpam-thinkfinger (depends on libthinkfinger0)
> libthinkfinger0
> libthinkfinger-dev
> thinkfinger (depends on libpam-thinkfinger)
(What is the thinkfinger package for, if the tool is in the library package?)
I really think the binary should not go in the library package, see
http://www.netfo
Hi,
When did you plan to upload this package ?
cheers,
--
Emmanuel Bouthenot
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
David Smith wrote:
> I agree using dpatch is better so I've made the appropriate
> changes and reuploaded. I'm a big fan of darcs and am
> evaluating darcs-buildpackage but for now, just using dpatch is
> definitely better than directly modifying the source.
everything good, except that your orig.
43 matches
Mail list logo
