Your message dated Wed, 27 Jan 2016 08:22:28 +0100
with message-id <20160127072228.gs15...@vis.informatik.uni-osnabrueck.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #806280,
regarding ITP: ros-metapackages -- Robot OS core metapackages
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
Processing control commands:
> owner -1 !
Bug #442363 [wnpp] RFP: php-db-dataobject -- SQL Builder, Object Interface to
Owner recorded as Bhuvan Krishna .
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #442363 [wnpp] RFP: php-db-dataobject -- SQL Builder, Object Interface to
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
442363: http://bu
control: owner -1 !
control: tag -1 moreinfo
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: sahara-dashboard
Version : 4.0.0~b2
Upstream Author : OpenStack Foundation
* URL : https://github.com/openstack/sahara-dashboard
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Descript
Processing control commands:
> block 812737 by 808176
Bug #812737 [neovim] neovim: python-neovim is recommended
812737 was not blocked by any bugs.
812737 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 812737: 808176
--
812737: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=812737
Debian
Your message dated Tue, 26 Jan 2016 23:00:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#812673: fixed in mopidy-internetarchive 2.0.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #812673,
regarding ITP: mopidy-internetarchive -- Mopidy extension for playing music
from the Internet Archive
to be marked as d
Your message dated Tue, 26 Jan 2016 23:01:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#804037: fixed in ros-rviz 1.11.10+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #804037,
regarding ITP: ros-rviz -- 3D visualization tool for ROS.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Tue, 26 Jan 2016 23:00:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#812792: fixed in airlift-slice 0.10-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #812792,
regarding ITP: airlift-slice -- Java library for efficiently working with heap
and off-heap memory
to be marked as done.
This me
Hello,
Seeing that this ITP is dead for some time already, what has happened with it?
I'd love to see the godot engine in Debian.
Thanks a lot,
est
Quoting Dmitry Smirnov (2016-01-25 19:05:10)
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 01:09:04 PM Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>>> retitle 702134 ITP: koha -- Koha Integrated Library System
>
> It is really awesome that you are working on Koha, Jonas.
>
> I wish I had time to give you a hand but likely I won't b
On Tue, 26 Jan 2016, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
>Hi
>I think we should try to finalize 1.5 first, unless we see major issues
>with that, or if you know what they have fixed important things in 1.6.
nope -- I know nothing yet about 1.6 ;-) so ok -- let's finalize 1.5.
--
Yaroslav O. Halc
Hi
I think we should try to finalize 1.5 first, unless we see major issues
with that, or if you know what they have fixed important things in 1.6.
Best regards,
// Ola
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 6:21 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 26 Jan 2016, Geoffrey Thomas wrote:
>
> > Hi maintaine
An update in regards to the Debian package name conflict (ie. not the
Python module name conflict discussed on [1]): the upstream author has
confirmed that it has "no real preference" over the chosen Debian
package name, and we temptatively agreed on using something similar to
"python-jellyfishstr"
Package: wnpp
Owner: Roland Fehrenbacher
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libfabric
Version : 1.2.0
Upstream Author : Sean Hefty and others
* URL or Web page : http://ofiwg.github.io/libfabric/
* License : GPL 2 or OpenIB.org BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description
W dniu 24.01.2016, nie o godzinie 18∶49 +, użytkownik Alessio
Treglia napisał:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Alessio Treglia
>
> * Package name: plugn
>
Such name might be a little to generic - I'd suggest adding some
prefix lub suffix mentioning Go language.
Best regar
On Tue, 26 Jan 2016, Geoffrey Thomas wrote:
> Hi maintainers,
> I'm interested in using tigervnc for its 3D acceleration support. I
> built tigervnc 1.5.0 from git (4a25ccd) on jessie, with a no-change
> backport of fltk1.3 1.3.3-6, and it seems to work very well out of the
> box: I can run GNOM
Hi maintainers,
I'm interested in using tigervnc for its 3D acceleration support. I
built tigervnc 1.5.0 from git (4a25ccd) on jessie, with a no-change
backport of fltk1.3 1.3.3-6, and it seems to work very well out of the
box: I can run GNOME 3 with llvmpipe inside the server, and the client
also
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Emmanuel Bourg
* Package name: airlift-slice
Version : 0.10
Upstream Author : David Phillips, Dain Sundstrom, Martin Traverso
* URL : https://github.com/airlift/slice
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Desc
Hi,
This ITP is now over a year old. Is this package still being worked on?
Is there a public WIP repository or packages that people can see yet
please?
Thanks,
--
Jonathan Dowland
Hi,
toogley wrote:
> does it bother, when i work at the package within a delay of a week at most?
If it doesn't bother that I work on the package, too.
At least I want to fix the things I broke with the initial 1.7.3
upload. :-)
> @Axel:
>
> May i import + upload the next version of wicd (whic
additionally: is it harmful for users/debian/wicd/whatever, when i work
at a particular problem regarding the wicd package with a delay of 2,3,4
weeks?
i mean, of course i intend to work regularly(=at least every week) on
wicd, but just to be sure..^^
On 01/26/2016 01:44 PM, toogley wrote:
does it bother, when i work at the package within a delay of a week at most?
@Axel:
May i import + upload the next version of wicd (which is 1.7.5, i think)?
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/wicd.html
says, the package building has failed, because of "dpkg-source: w
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jon Sneyers
* Package name: flif
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Jon Sneyers
* URL : http://flif.info/
* License : Currently: GPLv3+ (encoder), LGPLv3+ (decoder)
(will probably change soon to more p
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I'm not using this package regularly. Therefore, looking for a new maintainer.
The latest upstream release is from 2007-
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I'm not using this package regularly. Therefore, looking for a new maintainer.
Hi Jim,
> I support closing this bug. There is already an existing request to update
> the current tidy package from current source.
I'd agree, please close this bug as a duplicate of:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=655200
Cheers!
Daniel
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I'm not using this package regularly. Therefore, looking for a new maintainer.
I don't know about any new upstream release since the 1990s.
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I'm not using this package regularly. Therefore, looking for a new maintainer.
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I'm not using this package regularly. Therefore, looking for a new maintainer.
There was no upstream release since 2010.
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I'm not using this package regularly. Therefore, looking for a new maintainer.
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I'm not regularly using this package. Therefore, looking for a new maintainer.
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I'm not using this package regularly. Therefore, looking for a new maintainer.
The package is maintained in an svn repository at alioth.
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I'm not regularly using this package. Therefore, looking for a new maintainer.
Upstream releases regularly.
33 matches
Mail list logo