Hi,
On Thursday 10 February 2011 01.32:12 Jakub Wilk wrote:
Description : scanner button daemon
Scanmonitord is a daemon which runs device monitors on one or more
devices. [...]
I'm curious (and you might want to add it to the description): does this tie
in with modern desktop
Hi Steven,
On Thursday 13 January 2011 13.18:58 Steven McCoy wrote:
A year later and I have a basic Autoconf/Automake system in trunk for
OpenPGM ready to package for Debian.
Nice to see progress, note that I'm not involved in zeromq packaging anymore
(except to sponsor the odd upload)
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: opennx
Version : 0.16
Upstream Author : ??
* URL : http://opennx.net/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C++ (with wxwidgets)
Description : Open Source NX
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Adrian von Bidder avbid...@fortytwo.ch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
+++
* Package name: jwhoisserver
Version : 3.3.0 or newer
Upstream Author : Klaus Zerwes zero-sys.net zero...@users.sourceforge.net
* URL
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I had hoped to be able to do more than just play around with zeromq for
a short time, but can't find the time. I had hoped to avoid filing an
orphaning bug since Mato offered to continue packaging, but I've not
retitle 566126 RFP: openpgm -- Implementation of the Pragmatic General
Multicast protocol
thanks
Just had a quick look at openpgm source code. Does look a bit scary since
I don't know scons or cmake, and the number of compiler warnings the
build spits out is a bit too high for my taste.
In
On Sunday 03 January 2010 03.46:03 D Haley wrote:
A proposal for review has been uploaded to mentors:
http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=
opticalraytracer
Some build dependency is missing:
+++
~/tmp/opticalraytracer-2.7$ debuild
retitle 519583 RFP: opticalraytracer -- A Utility that analyzes systems of
lenses.
thanks
I won't have time for this package anytime soon :-(
-- vbi
--
Now, with penguins, (cuddly such), contented means it has either just
gotten laid, or it's stuffed on herring. Take it from me, I'm an expert
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Heyho!
Sibnce the packaging team on alioth (pkg-postgrey) was formed, there has
been no further action. I still hope they will pick up the pieces soon-ish
and address the too large (for such a small package) number of open bugs.
In the mean time, I hereby
Package: wnpp
Owner: Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder avbid...@fortytwo.ch
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: webkitkde
(like upstream svn dir; binary: konq-plugin-webkit like konq-plugins)
Version : svn snapshots
Upstream Author :
Hi,
Thanks a lot for your comments!
On Wednesday 16 April 2008 19.15:45 gregor herrmann wrote:
The build-dependency on quilt and debian/patches.mk seem unnecessary
but probably they are preparations for fixing the manpage
problem?
It's really just something from my hgdebuild script that I'm
Yodel!
I'd be happy if anybody could have a quick look at my XML::FeedPP package
and offer comments. The package is a dh-make-perl generated package,
edited a little bit. No changes to upstream so far.
http://fortytwo.ch/debian/libxml-feedpp-perl/
One lintian warning on the binary package:
retitle 432697 RFP: btrfs -- Checksumming Copy on Write Filesystem
tags 432697 -pending
thanks
Hi all,
Some of you may be aware that I created Debian packages for btrfs (the new
filesystem created by folks at Oracle). I have, however, come to the
conclusion that I need to reduce the time
page: http://oss.oracle.com/projects/btrfs/
In fact, preliminary packages are already available at
http://fortytwo.ch/debian/btrfs
Review of these packages welcome. (Yes, they're not signed. -EMYMISTAKE)
cheers
-- vbi
--
pub 1024D/92082481 2002-02-22 Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key
[There is a X-debbugs-cc header which allows easier handling of bug mail
gated to the lists]
On Monday 18 December 2006 10:16, Eduard Bloch wrote:
And/Or help developing or rewritting the incomplete designated
successor, apt-cacher-ng (currently C++ with some sugar).
Not to dissuade anyone
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 10:32, you wrote:
Adrian von Bidder wrote:
Yuck!
Have a cup of tea please. I intend to help both debian and ingres by
packaging this beast, not start just-another-flamewar on which dbms has
the longest toes.
I certainly didn't intend to start a flamewar, sorry
On Friday 01 December 2006 11:10, Paul J Stevens wrote:
The Ingres 2006 DBMS can support a wide range of applications, from
ad hoc queries to large-scale, mission-critical production applications
which require 24-hour-a-day, 7-day-a-week service. The Ingres 2006
Intelligent DBMS features a
On Wednesday 12 April 2006 00:23, Ben Hutchings wrote:
* Package name: rt2x00
This package would contain version 2 of the rt2x00 drivers that are
currently distributed as separate rt2400 and rt2500 packages (and a
proposed rt2570 package).
Did you talk with Aurelien (maintainer of
On Thursday 08 December 2005 15.38, Victor Seva wrote:
Version : x.y.z
Upstream Author : Name [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.)
Please *do* take the 2 minutes it takes ...
-- vbi
--
Winter is the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: rapple
Version : currently CVS only, first distribution tarball in
preparation
Upstream Author : Alan Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://rapple.sourceforge.net/
* License : BSD
merge 335173 195948
thanks
On Saturday 22 October 2005 12.08, Rudolf Weeber wrote:
* Package name: dspam
I am packaging this program, because we are using it the students'
representation at university, and having a standardized, easy to install
package would be very handy.
Have you
retitle 288769 RFP: cedilla -- ascii to postscript renderer
thanks
Hi,
Some of you might be aware that I intended to package cedilla, the
Unicode-aware text renderer (and possible a2ps etc. replacement).
Unfortunately, I don't see that I can spend the time to really know this
package well
On Monday 13 June 2005 09.41, frank wrote:
[texlive vs. teTeX]
Let me add some comments from my point of view (Debian teTeX
maintainer).
Sounds like packaging texlive and trying to get it really stable would be
the thing to do, with the goal of phasing out teTeX for etch+1
Not becuase I don't
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 02:33:06PM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
So I close this (298030) bug and retitle/reassign the wnpp ones now?
Wait any longer?
d-d isn't usefully archived (that is, per issue), like a buglog is, for
later review by QA and afterwards FTP-team.
Yeah, retitle
Hi Jeroen,
[removing pdp11-unix-v{5,6,7}]
On Saturday 12 March 2005 00.00, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
Please don't file a new bug for this, but rather retitle and reassign
the wnpp bugs appropriately,
Ok, shame on me, should've read the docs
prefereably by first mailing this to the
Hi,
You have previously done some work on the pdp11-unix-v{5,6,7} packages
(previously simh-unix-images) - is there any value in keeping them?
Kevin has recently orphaned these packages, they're non-free, and -
according to popcon - barely anybody uses them. So I was going to file for
On Thursday 13 January 2005 11.22, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the alevt package. I've got rid of the
necessary hardware to use it. (TV is just not worth the tax/toll.)
alevt is very little work, and upstream is responsive.
I still have my
On Monday 06 October 2003 08:03, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#191404: ITP: libwww-mechanize-perl -- Automate interaction with websites,
which was filed against the wnpp package.
Wheee! Thanks.
Thanks. (OTOH, I see that
28 matches
Mail list logo
