Steve Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: wnpp
I'm orphaning pump.. It has issues on machines with two interfaces and
machines with Full NAT enabled. On top of that, there is crap like
while(1);
in the source code. IMHO, it's not worth fixing, dhcp-client works
fine. (It
Package: wnpp
I'm orphaning pump.. It has issues on machines with two interfaces and
machines with Full NAT enabled. On top of that, there is crap like
while(1);
in the source code. IMHO, it's not worth fixing, dhcp-client works
fine. (It looks like the only safe way to send out the
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 06:26:00PM -0500, Steve Dunham wrote:
Package: wnpp
I'm orphaning pump.. It has issues on machines with two interfaces and
machines with Full NAT enabled. On top of that, there is crap like
while(1);
in the source code. IMHO, it's not worth fixing,
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 03:40:27PM -0800, Adam McKenna wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 06:26:00PM -0500, Steve Dunham wrote:
Package: wnpp
I'm orphaning pump.. It has issues on machines with two interfaces and
machines with Full NAT enabled. On top of that, there is crap like
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 06:26:00PM -0500, Steve Dunham wrote:
Package: wnpp
I'm orphaning pump.. It has issues on machines with two interfaces and
machines with Full NAT enabled. On top of that, there is crap like
while(1);
in the source code. IMHO, it's not worth fixing,
On 30-Nov-01, 17:26 (CST), Steve Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to recommend that pump be removed from woody
Sounds fine.
and dhcp-client Replaces pump, if there is no objection.
If you're using Replaces as a generic term (i.e. people should use
dhcp-client instead of pump), yes.
On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 18:26:00 -0500
Steve Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: wnpp
I'm orphaning pump.. It has issues on machines with two interfaces and
machines with Full NAT enabled. On top of that, there is crap like
while(1);
in the source code. IMHO, it's not worth
7 matches
Mail list logo