On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 16:08, Martin Waitz wrote:
> hi :)
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 11:42:42AM -0800, Link Dupont wrote:
> > Okay, newest revision up on mentors.debian.net. Based on the
> > MonoConventions and Martin's conclusion, I've removed the .la & .a
> > files. Does this look okay to everyo
hi :)
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 11:42:42AM -0800, Link Dupont wrote:
> Okay, newest revision up on mentors.debian.net. Based on the
> MonoConventions and Martin's conclusion, I've removed the .la & .a
> files. Does this look okay to everyone?
looks good, thanks for all the work :)
now we only need
On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 12:08, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> > with it, I'll keep on maintaining muine and use it as my non-DD entry
> > package (with Ross uploading for me). Thanks :)
>
> Ok, nice. About the .so file you can have a look on the mono
> conventions:
> http://wiki.debian.net/?MonoConventio
> with it, I'll keep on maintaining muine and use it as my non-DD entry
> package (with Ross uploading for me). Thanks :)
Ok, nice. About the .so file you can have a look on the mono
conventions:
http://wiki.debian.net/?MonoConventions
Good luck with your first package :)
Cheers,
Sebastien Ba
hi again :)
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 12:55:59AM -0800, Link Dupont wrote:
> If you're okay with it, I'll keep on maintaining muine and use it as
> my non-DD entry package (with Ross uploading for me). Thanks :)
sure, go ahead :)
--
CU, / Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen, Ger
On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 00:43, Martin Waitz wrote:
> hi :)
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 12:24:29AM -0800, Link Dupont wrote:
> > > BTW there is a problem with the package: it contains a library. So you
> > > should split it in muine/libmuine0/libmuine0-dev or remove the
> > > .[a|la|so] of the packag
hi :)
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 12:24:29AM -0800, Link Dupont wrote:
> > BTW there is a problem with the package: it contains a library. So you
> > should split it in muine/libmuine0/libmuine0-dev or remove the
> > .[a|la|so] of the package.
>
> Upon closer inspection, it looks like the .so file is
On Mon, 2004-02-16 at 23:30, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Link Dupont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Guess you all could just take a look and see if this stuff works for
> > you?
>
> Still the same problem when I go in "select folder" and choose a folder
> muine hangs ... perhaps due to my config
I'm thinking its better to just remove the .[a|la|so] files. They're not
needed for runtime, and it seems unnecessary to package dev files for an
end-user application. Agreed?
Sebastien and anyone else testing these packages: Have you tried the app
in a clean (aka new) user config? Does it work an
hi all :)
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 07:44:44PM +0100, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Ross Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Muine? Personally I think this should be in the GNOME Team repository,
> > but I do think most GNOMEy packages should be there really.
has anyone asked on the debian-gtk-gnome
Link Dupont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Guess you all could just take a look and see if this stuff works for
> you?
Still the same problem when I go in "select folder" and choose a folder
muine hangs ... perhaps due to my config but I've no idea of the problem.
BTW there is a problem with the
I just recompiled a new revision against the mono 0.30.1 pre debs and
uploaded it to mentors.debian.net.
What I've encountered: With an empty database to start with and
immediately after gconftool-2 --recursive-unset /apps/muine, I can:
* Import a folder containing about 15 songs (one album). The
Ross Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Muine? Personally I think this should be in the GNOME Team repository,
> but I do think most GNOMEy packages should be there really.
Yes, it would be nice to have it in the Gnome packages.
> (I'm stepping out of the maintenance issue, I'm willing to up
Hi all,
(Martin/Seb: Link Dupont is the non-DD who also created the Muine .deb I
was going to sponsor).
Right, we all have debs, so who here wants to actually maintainer
Muine? Personally I think this should be in the GNOME Team repository,
but I do think most GNOMEy packages should be there rea
On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 10:13:40AM +, Ross Burton wrote:
> Oh what fun. I'm also sponsoring a non-DD who has created a package.
so muine obviously created some interest...
> For me, Muine starts but I can't play anything. Is this the same
> problem others are seeing?
for me, muine 0.4 works
Ross Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For me, Muine starts but I can't play anything. Is this the same
> problem others are seeing?
Yes, here it just hangs on the import ...
> Link's package uses CDBS, has a manpage and seems pretty good to me.
I've the same advice :)
> Has everyone us
Hi all,
Oh what fun. I'm also sponsoring a non-DD who has created a package.
For me, Muine starts but I can't play anything. Is this the same
problem others are seeing?
Link's package uses CDBS, has a manpage and seems pretty good to me.
Has everyone used CDBS?
I've put the diff.gz online at
Martin Waitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> but it's ok if you want to do that work, too, of course.
> if you want i can send you my .diff
In fact Ross Burton said me he was going to sponsor a muine package. The
package is already done and I've already enough work with my packages,
so I've let it.
hi :)
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 10:10:43PM +0100, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> * Package name: muine
> Version : 0.3.2
> Upstream Author : Jorn Baayen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL or Web page : http://people.nl.linux.org/~jorn/Muine/
> * License : GPL
> Description : a musi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: muine
Version : 0.3.2
Upstream Author : Jorn Baayen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL or Web page : http://people.nl.linux.org/~jorn/Muine/
* License : GPL
Description : a music player using some new UI ideas
.
Muine is a n
20 matches
Mail list logo
