* Debian Bug Tracking System ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [05 05:33]:
>* New maintainer, closes: #295122.
Whoa, what's that? This package was *not* orphaned, I asked for an new
maintainer and said specifically:
| as iproute is quite vital for
| some purposes, I'll do some checks before giving the p
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 12:10:29PM +0100, Matej Vela wrote:
>retitle 295122 RFA: iproute -- Professional tools to control the networking in
>Linux kernels
>noowner 295122
>thanks
>
>On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 11:30:35 +0200, Matej Vela wrote:
>>On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 13:13:03 +0100, Stefano Melchior
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 12:10:29PM +0100, Matej Vela wrote:
[...]
>>>Do you still intend to adopt iproute? (This is just a ping, I'm not
>>>interested in adopting it myself.)
>>
>>I haven't heard back from you, so I'm assuming you're no longer
* Aníbal Monsalve Salazar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [05 11:03]:
> >| as iproute is quite vital for
> >| some purposes, I'll do some checks before giving the package away. It is
> >| _not_ orphaned, I'm "only" looking for somebody else for maintaining.
> >
> >You cannot just hijack any other package.
* Matej Vela ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [05 11:15]:
> Whoa, I wasn't asking him to upload, I was just pinging ITA bugs. And
> after getting no reply, I retitled it to RFA -- request for adoption --
> not O!
Which is BTW correct behaviour. I cannot see anything really wrong
(though in cases of ITA-bu
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 11:21:43AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
>* Matej Vela ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [05 11:15]:
>>Whoa, I wasn't asking him to upload, I was just pinging ITA bugs. And
>>after getting no reply, I retitled it to RFA -- request for adoption --
>>not O!
RFA and O have the same goal:
Re: Andreas Barth in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Why didn't you stop Matej from asking for an upload to adopt it?
>
> because Matej didn't Cc me? I read a lot of bugs, but I don't read all
> wnpp-bugs.
I still think it would be a good idea to file wnpp bugs on the package
(and have wnpp tag, or simil
On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 21:53 +1100, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> RFA and O have the same goal: to get someone to maintain a package.
Yes, but on different ways to achieve it.
--
David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.damog.net/
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 08:41:35PM +1100, An??bal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
Hi guys,
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 12:10:29PM +0100, Matej Vela wrote:
> >retitle 295122 RFA: iproute -- Professional tools to control the networking
> >in Linux kernels
> >noowner 295122
> >thanks
> >
> >On Thu, Oct 27, 200
9 matches
Mail list logo
