Greetings,
For those interested, I'm re-doing the Salomé .deb I started three years
ago. Salomé is a finite element pre-post processing framework, with a
lot of other things in there as well.
Though some things have improved between version 3.2.6 and 5.1.3, many
have not, so although this likely
On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 23:28 +0100, Nicolas Chauvat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 02:29:03PM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > For those interested, I'm re-doing the Salomé .deb I started three years
> > ...
> > Because I can't do the whole package, I'm putting up the progress I've
> >
Hello again,
I now have 10 modules enabled, and have made all but one of the patches
upstream-friendly, though I've only uploaded the -3 source package to
http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell/salome/ at the moment.
Nicolas, can you do me a favor and try to push some of the patches
upstream? You can find
Sorry, forgot to mention a couple of things yesterday. First, the
package doesn't build in current unstable, because HDF5 transitioned and
MED didn't transition with it. I may be able to help with MED to
resolve this, but not until next week. (It builds fine in my unstable
chroot updated a few d
Hi Adam,
I am André Espaze, the Logilab's employee supposed to help you in the
Salomé packaging for Debian. First I wanted to thank you for the great
work that you did on the current package. Then I would like to let you
know my progress on the testing part.
I have succeeded to build most of the
On 2010/2/11 Andre Espaze:
[...]
> - it seems to lack the 'config.h' file in the libopencascade-*
> packages. Else do you know where that file could be? I fear that
> some components (like GEOM) really need it.
[...]
Hi André,
This file has been dropped intentionnally, it does not make s
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 05:32:35PM +0100, Andre Espaze wrote:
> How to you plan to collaborate on the package building? I would suggest
> to use the project http://www.python-science.org/project/salome-packaging
> because I can be efficiently organized on such a platform. Would you
> like to a
Le jeudi 11 février 2010 à 18:54 +0100, Nicolas Chauvat a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 05:32:35PM +0100, Andre Espaze wrote:
> > How to you plan to collaborate on the package building? I would suggest
> > to use the project http://www.python-science.org/project/salome-packaging
> > be
Hello Andre,
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 17:32 +0100, Andre Espaze wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> I am André Espaze, the Logilab's employee supposed to help you in the
> Salomé packaging for Debian. First I wanted to thank you for the great
> work that you did on the current package. Then I would like to let yo
Hello again,
I think this is getting into the technical details, so it is probably
not so interesting to the debian-science list. I'm afraid I can't
figure out a way to set up an account on ww.python-science.org; if you
can let me know how then I'll go ahead and use that.
In the meantime, I'd li
Hi Adam,
Thank you very much for your fast reply. I am sorry for not being as
responsive, I am new to Debian packaging and I am also discovering git.
> > I have succeeded to build most of the Salomé modules with the
> > version 5.1.3-3 that you uploaded at http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell/salome/
>
> I think this is getting into the technical details, so it is probably
> not so interesting to the debian-science list. I'm afraid I can't
> figure out a way to set up an account on ww.python-science.org; if you
> can let me know how then I'll go ahead and use that.
A message with your first and
Hello Andre,
No problem regarding the reply time. It takes a while to come up to
speed on git, quilt, and the complicated Debian packaging system.
I've made a lot of progress in getting salome to build and clean itself
properly, so some things should be much easier. The only thing not
building
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 11:59 +0100, Andre Espaze wrote:
> > I think this is getting into the technical details, so it is probably
> > not so interesting to the debian-science list. I'm afraid I can't
> > figure out a way to set up an account on ww.python-science.org; if you
> > can let me know how
Hi Adam,
>
> Until salome is uploaded into Debian, it will not be possible to use the
> bug tracking system for individual issues. At this point, the only
> "bug" in Debian is that salome isn't there -- #457075. :-)
Ok, so from now I organise tickets on
http://www.python-science.org/project/salo
Hi Andre,
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 10:05 +0100, Andre Espaze wrote:
> > Until salome is uploaded into Debian, it will not be possible to use the
> > bug tracking system for individual issues. At this point, the only
> > "bug" in Debian is that salome isn't there -- #457075. :-)
> Ok, so from now I o
Hi Adam,
>
> On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 10:05 +0100, Andre Espaze wrote:
> > > Until salome is uploaded into Debian, it will not be possible to use the
> > > bug tracking system for individual issues. At this point, the only
> > > "bug" in Debian is that salome isn't there -- #457075. :-)
> > Ok, so f
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 17:19 +0100, Andre Espaze wrote:
> Hi Adam,
> >
> > On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 10:05 +0100, Andre Espaze wrote:
> > > > Until salome is uploaded into Debian, it will not be possible to use the
> > > > bug tracking system for individual issues. At this point, the only
> > > > "bug
Hi Andre,
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 13:11 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 17:19 +0100, Andre Espaze wrote:
> > Hi Adam,
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 10:05 +0100, Andre Espaze wrote:
> > > > > Until salome is uploaded into Debian, it will not be possible to use
> > > > > t
Hi Adam,
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 10:05 +0100, Andre Espaze wrote:
> > > > > > Until salome is uploaded into Debian, it will not be possible to
> > > > > > use the
> > > > > > bug tracking system for individual issues. At this point, the only
> > > > > > "bug" in Debian is that sal
Hello Andre,
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 17:36 +0100, Andre Espaze wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 10:05 +0100, Andre Espaze wrote:
> > > > > > > Until salome is uploaded into Debian, it will not be possible to
> > > > > > > use the
> > > > > > > bug tracking system for individual issues. At th
Hi again,
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 12:12 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 17:36 +0100, Andre Espaze wrote:
> > However, I got a runtime error with my version, the study server is
> > not found even if I only work with the KERNEL and GUI modules. I am
> > going to run a new buil
Hi Adam
>
> On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 12:12 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 17:36 +0100, Andre Espaze wrote:
> > > However, I got a runtime error with my version, the study server is
> > > not found even if I only work with the KERNEL and GUI modules. I am
> > > going to run
Hi André,
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 17:23 +0100, Andre Espaze wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 12:12 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 17:36 +0100, Andre Espaze wrote:
> > > > However, I got a runtime error with my version, the study server is
> > > > not found even if I only
Hi Adam,
> > The last working version was actually the -4:
> >
> > c56f196854092f0dc0d222de71de1a4532f214ec
> > Release 5.1.3-4 "Look ma, it builds!"
>
> That's what I thought. I tried that one today (backported to Ubuntu
> Karmic), and it didn't work. I guess I'll have to bring X up i
Hi André,
Sorry about the delay, I've been trying to get X working in a chroot but
a known bug is making the keyboard and mouse not work... Copying my sid
chroot into its own partition now to try to boot and test there.
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 17:23 +0100, Andre Espaze wrote:
> > > The last workin
Hi everyone and apologies for the long delay since I last wrote.
On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 06:49 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 17:23 +0100, Andre Espaze wrote:
> > > > The last working version was actually the -4:
> > > >
> > > > c56f196854092f0dc0d222de71de1a4532f214ec
>
Hi Adam,
> Hi everyone and apologies for the long delay since I last wrote.
No problem, I was also busy on others projects but I am back
on Salomé for this week and I should work full time on it
for the week starting on the 19th of april.
>
> I've been getting VirtualBox to work, as suggested b
Hi André,
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 14:07 +0200, Andre Espaze wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> > Hi everyone and apologies for the long delay since I last wrote.
> No problem, I was also busy on others projects but I am back
> on Salomé for this week and I should work full time on it
> for the week starting o
Hi Adam,
>
> > Concerning the 5.1.3-5, I can not start Salomé from debian/tmp/usr. The
> > funny point is that I can run Salomé when compiling it by hand in a
> > dedicated directory. An identified problem was the line:
> >
> > chmod -x $(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.5/*-packages/salom
Hi André,
Apologies for the long delay in replying since your message arrived.
I've been very busy, and just yesterday finally compiled Salomé.
On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 12:06 +0200, Andre Espaze wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> >
> > > Concerning the 5.1.3-5, I can not start Salomé from debian/tmp/usr. The
>
Le mardi 20 avril 2010 à 15:25 +0200, Andre Espaze a écrit :
>
> > By the way, have you had any luck with asking upstream to adopt some
> of
> > these patches? Let me know if you need more information about any
> of
> > them.
> I discussed that point with Nicolas yesterday. I am supposed to submi
Hi Adam,
> Apologies for the long delay in replying since your message arrived.
> I've been very busy, and just yesterday finally compiled Salomé.
No problem, I have been busy too last week and I am now coming back
on Salomé.
>
> > I made the KERNEL and GUI modules work this morning on the 5.1.3-
Hi Sylvestre,
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 04:18:45PM +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Le mardi 20 avril 2010 à 15:25 +0200, Andre Espaze a écrit :
> >
> > > By the way, have you had any luck with asking upstream to adopt some
> > of
> > > these patches? Let me know if you need more information about
Hi Adam,
>
> > I guess that it is not relevant to run the 5.1.3-4 build again
> > if this version works for you. I am now starting a complete build
> > with all modules.
>
> I've built -5 with everything but VISU and NETGENPLUGIN (which don't
> build), they're at http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell/sal
Hi Adam,
> >
> > > I guess that it is not relevant to run the 5.1.3-4 build again
> > > if this version works for you. I am now starting a complete build
> > > with all modules.
> >
> > I've built -5 with everything but VISU and NETGENPLUGIN (which don't
> > build), they're at http://lyre.mit.e
Thank you Andre, the debian-science entry looks terrific!
It's very frustrating that bug 510057 against hdf5 is nearly 16 months
old, and there has been a simple patch available for 3.5 months, but
they have just added a new upstream version, with no progress on this or
571453. :-( I'm going to s
Hello all,
I think we're getting close to a -6 release and first upload into Debian
unstable. I'm noticing two issues though which will need just a tiny
bit of work.
First, the -dev dependency extends beyond libsalome-dev. For example,
the GEOM module requires libTKOpenGl.so which is in
libopen
Hi Adam,
Sorry for the delay, I have missed the -6 release but I have
just built the -7 one which works fine. I have updated the
documentation on:
http://wiki.debian.org/BuildingSalome
It seems that building Med dependencies by hand is no longer needed
because libmed-2.3.6-2 is now available in De
Hi André,
On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 09:40 +0200, Andre Espaze wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> Sorry for the delay, I have missed the -6 release but I have
> just built the -7 one which works fine.
No problem. -6 had a dumb mistake which caused it to be rejected by
Debian right away, so you didn't miss anythi
Hi again,
On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 14:44 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 09:40 +0200, Andre Espaze wrote:
> > > Second, I've cut the number of lintian warnings by dozens by making
> > > the .py files non-executable. The one problem that results is during
> > > startup, which c
Greetings,
I am not a Salome user, but here are some (hopefully not too stupid)
remarks about
http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/salome_5.1.3-8.html
* Binary packages are under the contrib/ section, AFAICT they can be
moved into main
* libsalome and libsalome-dev ships a lot of shared librar
Hello Denis,
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 12:28 +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I am not a Salome user, but here are some (hopefully not too stupid)
> remarks about
>http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/salome_5.1.3-8.html
>
> * Binary packages are under the contrib/ section, AFAICT they
Hi Adam,
Sorry for the lack of news, I was focus on making VISU work. I have
succeeded to build a Salome package however the current result is
unfortunately split from our development line. That's why I will first
explain my steps and then ask your advice on the merge as I saw that
serious reorga
Hello André,
Thanks for your work on this, I'm glad it's working. I'm afraid I won't
have much time to look into your tree, let alone merge the differences,
for a few days, but will get back to you soon.
-Adam
On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 12:06 +0200, Andre Espaze wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> Sorry for the
Hello Adam,
I have just succeeded to make a 5.1.3-9 release with VISU, I have
enclosed the 2 patches. I also wanted to let you know that I have
understood the runtime problems of VISU but I need to progress
by steps (my solution is still too messy for being published). I will
first be glad if the
Hello Andre,
I've installed your patches, but still have the same build error:
./.libs/libVisuConvertor.so: undefined reference to `vtkIntArray*
VISU::GetIDMapper(VISU::TFieldList*, VISU::TGetPointData,
char const*)'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
It seems like if the problem were the mis
Hi Adam,
>
> I've installed your patches, but still have the same build error:
>
> ./.libs/libVisuConvertor.so: undefined reference to `vtkIntArray*
> VISU::GetIDMapper(VISU::TFieldList*,
> VISU::TGetPointData, char const*)'
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>
> It seems like if the proble
Hello Andre,
First, some great news: Salomé was accepted into unstable! Now we can
file multiple independent bugs and track all of these issues separately.
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 10:53 +0200, Andre Espaze wrote:
> Hi Adam,
> >
> > I've installed your patches, but still have the same build error:
Hello Adam,
>
> First, some great news: Salomé was accepted into unstable! Now we can
> file multiple independent bugs and track all of these issues separately.
Excellent! I am really glad to hear it.
>
> > I feel really sorry for the wrong patch that I sent you, the reason
> > is that I forgot
50 matches
Mail list logo
