> Also I noticed that upstream released 0.3.17 this week.
And it looks like 0.3.18 is now there...
Jumping on the bandwagon here, but without any time myself to help in
the packaging effort :P
micah
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "uns
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 08:48:46PM -0500, micah wrote:
Also I noticed that upstream released 0.3.17 this week.
And it looks like 0.3.18 is now there...
Jumping on the bandwagon here, but without any time myself to help in
the packaging effort :P
Package json-spirit now uploaded to NEW que
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:55:18 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Thanks for the encouragements, everyone!
Go Jonas go!!
Maybe we can send you some bitcoins in thanks :)
micah
pgpeQOKV58bNj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:55:18 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 08:48:46PM -0500, micah wrote:
> >
> >> Also I noticed that upstream released 0.3.17 this week.
> >
> >And it looks like 0.3.18 is now there...
> >
> >Jumping on the bandwagon here, but without any time myself t
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 10:33:35AM -0500, micah anderson wrote:
Do you have a repository somewhere with any work done thus far? I've
tried out the cli for a while and it seems like a worthwhile package to
make without the gui bits.
Sorry - I thought the news was already filed here in the bugre
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 04:46:30PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 10:33:35AM -0500, micah anderson wrote:
Do you have a repository somewhere with any work done thus far?
I've tried out the cli for a while and it seems like a worthwhile
package to make without the gui bit
On Thu, 6 Jan 2011 17:45:57 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 04:46:30PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 10:33:35AM -0500, micah anderson wrote:
> >>Do you have a repository somewhere with any work done thus far?
> >>I've tried out the cli for a wh
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 10:39:11AM -0500, micah anderson wrote:
I noticed that you are build-depending on libdb4.7++, I dont know that
much about the bdb madness, but I do know that the bitcoin that I
compiled from source was compiled against libdb4.8++ and when I try and
install your packaged
On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 17:02:20 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 10:39:11AM -0500, micah anderson wrote:
> >I noticed that you are build-depending on libdb4.7++, I dont know that
> >much about the bdb madness, but I do know that the bitcoin that I
> >compiled from source was
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 12:06:37PM -0500, micah anderson wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 17:02:20 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard
wrote:
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 10:39:11AM -0500, micah anderson wrote:
>I noticed that you are build-depending on libdb4.7++, I dont know
>that much about the bdb madness, but I
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 08:17:29PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
So what really is the issue here is that _at_ _each_ _runtime_
_environment_ are the db files incompatible.
I know that problem already from Netatalk, which also until recently
did not support seemless upgrading.
I'll immediat
On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 20:17:29 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 12:06:37PM -0500, micah anderson wrote:
> >On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 17:02:20 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard
> >wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 10:39:11AM -0500, micah anderson wrote:
> >> >I noticed that you are build-de
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 12:54:58AM -0500, micah anderson wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 20:17:29 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard
wrote:
So what really is the issue here is that _at_ _each_ _runtime_
_environment_ are the db files incompatible.
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E17276_01/html/programmer_r
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 09:48:06AM -0500, micah anderson wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 09:46:29 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 12:54:58AM -0500, micah anderson wrote:
>On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 20:17:29 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard
>wrote:
>> So what really is the issue here is that
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 09:46:29 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 12:54:58AM -0500, micah anderson wrote:
> >On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 20:17:29 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard
> >wrote:
> >> So what really is the issue here is that _at_ _each_ _runtime_
> >> _environment_ are the db files
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 16:13:13 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 09:48:06AM -0500, micah anderson wrote:
> >On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 09:46:29 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard
> >wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 12:54:58AM -0500, micah anderson wrote:
> >> >On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 20:17:29 +
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 02:15:17PM -0500, micah anderson wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 12:54:58AM -0500, micah anderson wrote:
Transaction logs are great, if you want to do recovery, but I
wonder if they are really needed. If I recall, they simply grow,
until you rotate them, unless you set sp
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 21:31:39 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 02:15:17PM -0500, micah anderson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 12:54:58AM -0500, micah anderson wrote:
> >Transaction logs are great, if you want to do recovery, but I
> >wonder if they are reall
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:03:53AM -0500, micah anderson wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 21:31:39 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I consider adding a shell wrapper looking something like this:
set -e
umask=077
basedir=~/.bitcoin
dbfile="$basedir/DB_CONFIG"
cfgfile="$basedir/bitcoin.conf"
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 10:50:25 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:03:53AM -0500, micah anderson wrote:
> >On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 21:31:39 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >> I consider adding a shell wrapper looking something like this:
> >>
> >> set -e
> >> umask=077
> >>
20 matches
Mail list logo
