Hi Joachim, hi all,
Yesterday I played with several things that are still a showstopper
for upload to Debian...
1. Name of the tarballs...
After doing some reading on multiple tarballs, I adapted the tarball
names spit out by debian/rules get-orig-source. These still have to be
imported
Hi
How dependent is the patched xorg code on the tigervnc source? Is it
so that we could provide a -dev module from tigervnc that we could
use from xorg source? In the past they have been extremely dependent
on each other but I do not know if that has changed.
// Ola
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 03:3
> I am happy with any approach. I am just more used to handling things
> with pristine-tar...
yes -- this would probably be the easiest/most straightforward way at
the moment, so just keep it this way, and let me just blurb about this
alternative approach I had in mind:
> I have just moved the gi
Hi Yaroslav, hi Joachim,
On So 08 Apr 2012 20:54:34 CEST Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
wild idea (sorry if I missed that brought up before): since Debian
xorg-server packaging is under git, why not make xorg-server a submodule
pointing to the corresponding (might differ for
wheeze-vs-squeezebackpo
wild idea (sorry if I missed that brought up before): since Debian
xorg-server packaging is under git, why not make xorg-server a submodule
pointing to the corresponding (might differ for
wheeze-vs-squeezebackport branches) treeish of
git://git.debian.org/git/pkg-xorg/xserver/xorg-server
then it
Hi Joachim, hi all,
On So 08 Apr 2012 12:56:48 CEST Joachim Falk wrote:
As we prepare packages for Debian wheezy and have to move the package
into unstable first, we have to use Xorg from unstable.
The tigervnc package builds again on Debian sid. However, for a build
on Debian squeeze (back
Hi Joachim,
On So 08 Apr 2012 18:53:20 CEST Joachim Falk wrote:
So, as we require the Xserver in tree anyway, I did not bother to
build vnc.so against xserver-xorg-dev.
My vote is to leave it that way for now, as well. Hope the ftpmasters
won't complain...
Mike
--
DAS-NETZWERKTEAM
mike
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mike, Ola
Am 08.04.2012 17:06, schrieb Ola Lundqvist:
> Hi Mike
>
>> Mike Gabriel wrote:
>>> Joachim Falk wrote:
>>> Well, you also have disabled vnc.so. If you don't use the current
>>> X11 server of the distribution, then a working vnc.so is not
Hi Mike
If you can build it against xorg dev package that would be
very good.
For vnc4 and tightvnc it is not possible due to various
reasons, but for tigervnc I do not know.
For vnc.so I think it should be possible, but to build a
Xvnc binary I do not know.
Best regards,
// Ola
On Sun, Apr 0
Hi Joachim, hi Ola,
On So 08 Apr 2012 12:56:48 CEST Joachim Falk wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mike, Ola,
Am 07.04.2012 22:37, schrieb Ola Lundqvist:
Mike Gabriel wrote:
Hi Joachim,
On Sa 07 Apr 2012 22 :10:26 CEST Joachim Falk wrote:
[SNIP]
The git subproject
Good point. vnc.so makes this harder.
/ Ola
Sent from my phone
-Original Message-
From: Joachim Falk
To: Ola Lundqvist
Cc: Mike Gabriel , 654...@bugs.debian.org,
Yaroslav Halchenko
Sent: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 12:56
Subject: Re: Bug#654924: Inclusion of TigerVNC sources
-BEGIN PGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mike, Ola,
Am 07.04.2012 22:37, schrieb Ola Lundqvist:
> Mike Gabriel wrote:
>
>> Hi Joachim,
>>
>> On Sa 07 Apr 2012 22 :10:26 CEST Joachim Falk wrote:
[SNIP]
>>> The git subproject is hardcoded to this version. Of course if
>>> you built for wh
Lundqvist
Sent: Sat, 07 Apr 2012 22:21
Subject: Re: Bug#654924: Inclusion of TigerVNC sources
Hi Joachim,
On Sa 07 Apr 2012 22:10:26 CEST Joachim Falk wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> object 869682effd2abbd48c47653e63d451e24666830a
Hi Joachim,
On Sa 07 Apr 2012 22:10:26 CEST Joachim Falk wrote:
object 869682effd2abbd48c47653e63d451e24666830a
type commit
tag xorg-server-2_1.7.7-14
tagger Julien Cristau 1319927200 +0200
Tagging upload of xorg-server 2:1.7.7-14 to squeeze.
The git subproject is hardcoded to this vers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 07.04.2012 22:05, schrieb Mike Gabriel:
> Hi Joachim,
>
> On Sa 07 Apr 2012 21:30:42 CEST Joachim Falk wrote:
>
>> Ok, I also commit some changes you might find useful to implement
>> get-orig-source, please pull. I also changed to pkg version to
Hi Joachim,
On Sa 07 Apr 2012 21:30:42 CEST Joachim Falk wrote:
Ok, I also commit some changes you might find useful to implement
get-orig-source, please pull. I also changed to pkg version to
1.2.0+X1.7.7_14-2 as per Ola's suggestion to also include the xserver
version we use.
Are you sure,
Hi Joachim,
On Sa 07 Apr 2012 21:30:42 CEST Joachim Falk wrote:
Ok, I also commit some changes you might find useful to implement
get-orig-source, please pull. I also changed to pkg version to
1.2.0+X1.7.7_14-2 as per Ola's suggestion to also include the xserver
version we use.
Ok, thanks! Ve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 07.04.2012 21:20, schrieb Mike Gabriel:
> Hi all,
>
> On Sa 07 Apr 2012 17:51:28 CEST Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sat, 07 Apr 2012, Joachim Falk wrote:
>>> > I have look at the package more closely and several thing come to my
>>> > mind.
Hi all,
On Sa 07 Apr 2012 17:51:28 CEST Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
On Sat, 07 Apr 2012, Joachim Falk wrote:
> I have look at the package more closely and several thing come to my
> mind...
> 1. Do we need a package upload sponsor? I have one
> (p...@debian.org, Debian Edu)
Ola, I guess
Hi all
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 11:51:28AM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
>
> On Sat, 07 Apr 2012, Joachim Falk wrote:
> > > I have look at the package more closely and several thing come to my
> > > mind...
>
> > > 1. Do we need a package upload sponsor? I have one
> > > (p...@debian.org,
On Sat, 07 Apr 2012, Joachim Falk wrote:
> > I have look at the package more closely and several thing come to my
> > mind...
> > 1. Do we need a package upload sponsor? I have one
> > (p...@debian.org, Debian Edu)
> Ola, I guess you still have the contacts for Debian proper?
or just me (if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 07.04.2012 14:18, schrieb Mike Gabriel:
> Hi Joachim,
>
> I have look at the package more closely and several thing come to my
> mind...
>
> 1. Do we need a package upload sponsor? I have one
> (p...@debian.org, Debian Edu)
Ola, I guess you s
Hi Joachim,
I have look at the package more closely and several thing come to my mind...
1. Do we need a package upload sponsor? I have one (p...@debian.org, Debian
Edu)
2. We have to include full TigerVNC source in the package. People have to be
able to download the tigervnc source vi
23 matches
Mail list logo
