Hi Sergio!
I'll have a look at ppsspp this weekend.
On a sidenote, I think you should reduce the number of packages that
you are working on a bit [1]. Having so many packages when you're
still new to packaging isn't really the best way of learning the
proper techniques.
I would advise focusing o
Thanks G. !
Package updated.
sergio-br2
(disclaimer to Adrian, I don't want to steal that package to you :) )
Hi Serio, Adrian,
>Yes, I'm aware of that. I was busy fixing the fallout of the libpng1.6
>transition and there is lots of packages that we need to fix.
FYI, we are currently tracking problems here, feel free to contribut
> On Apr 10, 2016, at 8:18 AM, PICCORO McKAY Lenz
> wrote:
>
> new ppsspp mentors package need sponsored
Yes, I'm aware of that. I was busy fixing the fallout of the libpng1.6
transition and there is lots of packages that we need to fix.
So, please be aware that we have priorities in Debian.
new ppsspp mentors package need sponsored
the package are in very good shape, uses new libpng from system and
some fix/hacks in the fonts issues
a missing debian root menu (for those desktops that only are window managers)
the patches do the best for some system used fixeds, but i doub around
th
Hi,
Since libpng16 is still in experimental, maybe it should be better just
comment out the ppsspp-sdl in control and rules, and build just Qt,
which uses this version of libpng only in the build time for the atlas
and zimtool (and they build the atlas fonts). I think it's better than
waiting
On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 09:10:32PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Well, I've been receiving multiple bug reports through various lists in the
> past days from the libpng maintainers which asked people to fix their B-D
> regarding libpng-dev to prepare for libpng1.6 and setting these bu
> On Jan 7, 2016, at 8:58 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
>
> well, libpng16 is nowhere near to start, if by start you mean being
> uploaded to unstable and starting the actual transition.
Well, I've been receiving multiple bug reports through various lists in the
past days from the libpng maintaine
On 10/15/2015 06:02 PM, Sérgio Benjamim wrote:
> libfreetype6 compiled fine against libpng16, I just had to change
> control and rules.
Looks like the libpng1.6 is about to start, the bug report in question
was just updated [1].
Sergio, can you provide an updated ppsspp package?
Adrian
> [1] ht
On 10/15/2015 06:02 PM, Sérgio Benjamim wrote:
> libfreetype6 compiled fine against libpng16, I just had to change
> control and rules.
But you cannot install libfreetype6-dev and libpng16-dev in parallel
as libfreetype6-dev depends on libpng-dev which is provided by
libpng12-dev which conflicts w
libfreetype6 compiled fine against libpng16, I just had to change
control and rules.
--
Sergio Benjamim
On 15/10/2015 12:29, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 10/15/2015 05:23 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
well, I am, but I was giving a fact, not saying I would sponsor such hack, just
On 10/15/2015 05:23 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> well, I am, but I was giving a fact, not saying I would sponsor such hack,
> just mentioning
> that $somebody else is already doing that on debian.
Embedding a library is an absolute no-go in Debian, particularly
with core stuff like libpng.
Hi,
>Haha, that's a good one. You haven't been around here long enough, no?
well, I am, but I was giving a fact, not saying I would sponsor such hack, just
mentioning
that $somebody else is already doing that on debian.
(if you look to my -mentors sponsoring activities you can see I don't eve
On 10/15/2015 05:06 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> well, there is at least two more solutions:
> 1) target the upload to experimental, where the libpng16 is available
No, that's not possible because ppsspp build-depends on libfreetype6-dev
which conflicts with libpng16-dev. Try installing libf
Hi,
>I don't even see libpng16-dev in Ubuntu, even in wily, the current
>development release. libpng is a core library, you can't just brutally
>upgrade that to a new upstream version without risking breaking
>anything. You'll risk breaking tons of packages. Something as important
>as libpng n
On 10/15/2015 04:27 PM, Sérgio Benjamim wrote:
> All distro moved or are moving to libpng16, only debian is in the 1.2.x
> for ages.
I don't even see libpng16-dev in Ubuntu, even in wily, the current
development release. libpng is a core library, you can't just brutally
upgrade that to a new upstr
Hi,
How did you manage to build the package on your machine? And is there
no way to use an older version of libpng? I don't understand why the
PPSSPP developers thought it would be a good idea to build against
libpng16 when libpng12 is still the default version.
Adrian
All distro moved or ar
So, I just had a look at the latest package version you put up on
mentors and I can't even install the build dependencies:
(experimental-amd64-sbuild)root@z6:/# apt-get install libpng16-dev
libfreetype6-dev
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
So
Hi,
I don't really understand why Sergio filed it anyway. I told him I would
take care of the sponsoring for him, so there is no need to make a
public request for sponsoring.
Adrian
Sorry, at the time I thought it was somewhat obliged to make a RFS bug :p
I'm very noob at these things and I'
On 10/13/2015 07:32 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> so, can I please set yourself as owner of the RFS bug? this way I won't
> bother you anymore :)
> (I didn't find any good way to "look at RFS bugs only where nobody is looking
> at them", if not
> by setting yourself as owner, as described in
Hi Adrian!
>Adrian, not John.
(my deep apologies for this mistake)
>Why should we switch over to the RFS bug report? What would that change
>and why would there be any double work? I have been in contact with
>Benjamin for a while now and we are just discussing the issues in
>public so that ot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 10/13/2015 07:09 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi John and Sérgio,
Adrian, not John.
> thanks for your precious work on this package!
>
> However, I would like to ask you considering switching the
> discussion in bug #801262, and set your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi John and Sérgio,
thanks for your precious work on this package!
However, I would like to ask you considering switching the discussion
in bug #801262, and set yourself as owner of that bug, this way we can
avoid double work on the same packages.
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 12:45:33AM -0300, Sérgio Benjamim wrote:
> >There are several lintian errors and warnings that you should get rid
> >of. Most notably, lintian complains about an embedded libpng:
> >
> >E: ppsspp-sdl: embedded-library usr/games/ppsspp-sdl: libpng
>
> It needs libpng >= 1.6,
Hey Adrian,
There are several lintian errors and warnings that you should get rid
of. Most notably, lintian complains about an embedded libpng:
E: ppsspp-sdl: embedded-library usr/games/ppsspp-sdl: libpng
It needs libpng >= 1.6, and it's only in the Experimental :/
Are there any ETA to see i
Hi Sergio!
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 08:03:11PM -0300, Sérgio Benjamim wrote:
> The package is updated to 1.1.0.
There are several lintian errors and warnings that you should get rid
of. Most notably, lintian complains about an embedded libpng:
E: ppsspp-sdl: embedded-library usr/games/ppsspp-sdl:
The package is updated to 1.1.0.
--
Sergio Benjamim
On 09/16/2015 07:17 AM, Sérgio Benjamim wrote:
> The package now use ffmpeg from the system :)
>
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/ppsspp
Very good, thank you!
I will have a look later this week. Today I'm quite busy.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - g
The package now use ffmpeg from the system :)
https://mentors.debian.net/package/ppsspp
Sergio Benjamim
On 10/09/2015 06:01, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 09/09/2015 11:36 PM, Sérgio Benjamim wrote:
Help are welcome in this package.
Does it still rely on an embedded version of ffmpeg
On 09/09/2015 11:36 PM, Sérgio Benjamim wrote:
> Help are welcome in this package.
Does it still rely on an embedded version of ffmpeg?
I think we will have little chance of getting the emulator accepted into
Debian until this issue has been resolved. The code must be patched to
use the ffmpeg li
I updated the source to the latest git commit (dc4fb4c). Upstream will
release 1.1 soon I think.
Here what I deleted from the source:
find . -name "*.vcxproj" -type f -delete
find . -name "*.vcxproj.filters" -type f -delete
rm -f -r ext/native/ext/libpng17 ext/native/ext/glew
ext/native/ext/li
Hi!
I updated a preliminary Qt packaging:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/ppsspp-qt
It's missing some stuff yet, like shared ffmpeg (works with 2.7.2),
cityhash and libpng (>=1.6.x).
I don't know if it's worth to package the SDL port, It's not working on
ARM hardware and it seems it's n
Hi Sergio!
On 06/02/2015 07:42 AM, Sergio benjamim Rocha filho wrote:
> Are there any progress in this ITP?
I actually had an almost finished package but at some point I forgot
about it because I was busy with other stuff.
> I had already packed it (I didn't know someone was working on it),
> th
Hi,
Are there any progress in this ITP?
I had already packed it (I didn't know someone was working on it), the problem
is I use 2 packages, one for SDL and other for Qt, so I need to merge them to
push to mentors.
https://code.launchpad.net/~sergio-br2/ppsspp/debian-sdl
https://code.launchpa
Hello Anthony!
On 01/25/2014 08:55 AM, Anthony Wong wrote:
> May I know what is the progress of this ITP?
Sorry for the late reply! I was on a trip through South America
the past three weeks and had very limited internet access.
Anyway, ppsspp is still on my TODO list. I have a working package
f
Hi John,
May I know what is the progress of this ITP?
Thanks,
Anthony
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
* Package name: ppsspp
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Henrik Rydgård
* URL : http://www.ppsspp.org/
* License : GPL2+
PSPSDK BSD-compatible license
Programming Lang: C, C+
37 matches
Mail list logo
