Bug#802151: RFA: cowdancer -- pbuilder running on cowdancer

2016-03-15 Thread James Clarke
Control: retitle -1 ITA: cowdancer -- pbuilder running on cowdancer Control: owner -1 ! Hi, > By all means, if you would like to maintain cowbuild you are really free > to! :) > Just, I'd like to see some work before giving you commit access to the > repository. > Just do as follow: > 1) clone

Bug#802151: RFA: cowdancer -- pbuilder running on cowdancer

2016-03-15 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
[not keeping James in the loop since I know he is subscribed to the ML] On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 03:19:26PM +, James Clarke wrote: > It seems this wasn’t sent to the mailing list, so I’m forwarding it myself. yes, mails/bugs against the wnpp pseudo-package are very much not forwarded to the

Bug#802151: RFA: cowdancer -- pbuilder running on cowdancer

2016-03-14 Thread James Clarke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi Iain, I see this RFA has been outstanding for a while now. I have fairly recently become a Debian Maintainer, although I have been maintaining the polyml package for half a year now. As a regular user of cowbuilder, I would be interested in

Bug#802151: RFA: cowdancer -- pbuilder running on cowdancer

2015-10-17 Thread Iain R. Learmonth
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, I recently upgraded my laptop to an SSD. I was very impressed with the new found speed I was experiencing but when I went to reinstall cowbuilder, I noticed it had fallen out of testing. I've fixed up some of the issues with the cowdancer package, the source