On Sun, 17 Apr 2016 03:42:23 +1000, Ben Finney
wrote:
[...]
> So there appears to be a path – work carefully to get those parts
> packaged for Debian as build dependencies for ‘infglk.h’.
Indeed, which is good news all told.
> None the less, I would like the current “6.12+dfsg.1-1” release of
>
On 16-Apr-2016, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> I'm not convinced this is non-free. The only troublesome clause I
> see is the requirement to mention Zarf's name and the URL; but that
> isn't less free than say the zlib license AFAICS... Am I missing
> something?
I mis-parsed the text of those license condi
On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 16:07:39 +1000, Ben Finney
wrote:
> On 16-Apr-2016, Ben Finney wrote:
> > * I can look at ‘glk-dev’ and maybe package that too, as a build
> > dependency for ‘inform6lib’. This would delay the ‘inform6lib’
> > inclusion, by an unknown interval.
>
> It turns out that ‘glk
On 16-Apr-2016, Ben Finney wrote:
> * I can look at ‘glk-dev’ and maybe package that too, as a build
> dependency for ‘inform6lib’. This would delay the ‘inform6lib’
> inclusion, by an unknown interval.
It turns out that ‘glk-dev’ (needed to build the ‘infglk.h’ file)
itself has a non-free bui
4 matches
Mail list logo
