On 07/11/2016 06:39 PM, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> I don't think this is a fair assessment. There are several desktops that are
> based on the GTK libraries. A GTK application that uses the library but does
> not
> use any desktop specific libraries / extensions / etc, can be considered
> deskt
Hola John Paul Adrian Glaubitz!
> Unlike previously mentioned in this discussion, these applications aren't
> fully
> desktop-agnostic as they are written in GTK and the Mint people admit that
> themselves.
I don't think this is a fair assessment. There are several desktops that are
based on the
On 07/10/2016 03:34 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> That blog post made me think this was a coordinated effort between various DEs
> to create some apps that they all would use. Which would mean we wouldn't
> need a
> gnome-$foo fork Cinnamon, another one for Mate, etc...
It isn't, it's a Min
On 07/11/2016 10:45 AM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-07-10 at 08:39 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Maybe the XFCE / Cinnamon / Mate maintainers can confirm if that is indeed
>> the plan.
>
> Talking for pkg-xfce: I have no idea what this is about.
The Linux Mint people (or the
On Sun, 2016-07-10 at 08:39 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Maybe the XFCE / Cinnamon / Mate maintainers can confirm if that is indeed
> the plan.
Talking for pkg-xfce: I have no idea what this is about.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed messa
On 10/07/16 15:14, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort writes:
>> On 09/07/16 22:31, Franciscarlos Santos Soares wrote:
>>> Hi Emilio!
>>>
>>> Thank you for contacting us. In fact, like independent application of any
>>> DE,
>>> but they were compatible with the traditional look of window
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort writes:
> On 09/07/16 22:31, Franciscarlos Santos Soares wrote:
>> Hi Emilio!
>>
>> Thank you for contacting us. In fact, like independent application of any
>> DE,
>> but they were compatible with the traditional look of windows and based on
>> the
>> GTK library. So w
My apologies for the garbage reply that I sent earlier. Accidentally sent from
a phone in my pocket.
And it had three mailing lists on it, failing in style. :(
Steve
m
On 10 July 2016 08:59:59 CEST, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
>On 07/10/2016 08:39 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> I foupml0lnd
>http://segfault.linuxmint.com/2016/02/the-first-two-x-apps-are-ready/,
>> which makes things clearer. Thisf seems to be a cross-desktop (Matea)
>> $₩p5p!4♧''
Am 9. Juli 2016 22:05:31 MESZ, schrieb Franciscarlos Santos Soares
:
>Package: wnpp
>Severity: wishlist
>Owner: Franciscarlos Santos Soares
>
>* Package name: xplayer
> Version : 1.0.7
> Upstream Author : Bastien Nocera
Are you sure Bastien is really the upstream? That would rea
Quoting John Paul Adrian Glaubitz (2016-07-10 08:59:59)
> On 07/10/2016 08:39 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > I found
> > http://segfault.linuxmint.com/2016/02/the-first-two-x-apps-are-ready/,
> > which makes things clearer. This seems to be a cross-desktop (Mate,
> > Cinnamon... XFCE?) pr
On 07/10/2016 09:55 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> I don't follow how it is "same concern": As I understand the blog post,
> the very purpose of X-Apps is to be desktop-agnostic. Do you consider
> pluma well suited as a desktop-agnostic editor? It currently links
> against libmate-desktop-2-17 a
On 07/10/2016 08:39 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> I found http://segfault.linuxmint.com/2016/02/the-first-two-x-apps-are-ready/,
> which makes things clearer. This seems to be a cross-desktop (Mate,
> Cinnamon...
> XFCE?) project to provide some core apps. Which we wouldn't end up with
> mu
Hi,
Please keep the bug report and debian-devel@ in Cc.
On 09/07/16 22:31, Franciscarlos Santos Soares wrote:
> Hi Emilio!
>
> Thank you for contacting us. In fact, like independent application of any DE,
> but they were compatible with the traditional look of windows and based on
> the
> GTK
On Jul 09, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Do we really need yet another fork of GNOME?
Probably not, but I suspect that this problem should be solved
upstream...
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 09/07/16 22:05, Franciscarlos Santos Soares wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Franciscarlos Santos Soares
>
> * Package name: xplayer
> Version : 1.0.7
> Upstream Author : Bastien Nocera
> * URL : https://github.com/linuxmint/xplayer
> * License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Franciscarlos Santos Soares
* Package name: xplayer
Version : 1.0.7
Upstream Author : Bastien Nocera
* URL : https://github.com/linuxmint/xplayer
* License : GPL, LGPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : Simple me
17 matches
Mail list logo