Re: translation of searchtmpl/search.wml

2003-01-20 Thread Tomohiro KUBOTA
Hi, From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Denis Barbier) Subject: Re: translation of searchtmpl/search.wml Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 21:46:34 +0100 At first glance it sounds very good, but I am not sure this is the way to go, because some strings are not handled by gettext, e.g. see Catalan strings in

Bug#177531: www.debian.org: http://www.debian.org/devel/passwordlessssh gives a dangerous advice about ssh

2003-01-20 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
Package: www.debian.org Version: N/A; reported 2003-01-20 Severity: normal Tags: security This Web page explains how to set up a remote access (presumably to Debian machines) with a passwordless SSH key. This is both dangerous (not every developer is the only root on his machine so setting the

Re: The Y2k pages

2003-01-20 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
* Peter Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-01-18 13:19]: Is there any good reason to keep the Y2k pages around? They're obviously obsolete, and refers to old versions of programs. You mean, like the hamm pages? I guess for historical reasons. Why not keep them? I guess deleting webpages is

Re: Moving from ftp://ftp.debian.org to http://ftp.debian.org

2003-01-20 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
Hi! * Davide Puricelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-01-18 22:33]: Hi, first of all an apology: I'm writing this email to all the translation coordinators, doing a Cc to debian-www mailing list, so, probably, some of you will receive two copies .. sorry for this inconvenience. Translation

Re: The Y2k pages

2003-01-20 Thread Peter Karlsson
Gerfried Fuchs: You mean, like the hamm pages? No, the hamm pages are linked, and they are about something that still exists (a Debian release), whereas the y2k pages are about something that no longer exist (the upcoming year 1999/2000 shift and the transitaional bugs that come with it). I

Re: Debian WWW CVS commit by atterer: webwml/english/CD/jigdo-cd index.wml

2003-01-20 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
* Debian WWW CVS [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-01-19 04:03]: Modified files: english/CD/jigdo-cd: index.wml Log message: Don't use 'current' dir for current jigdo files cos symlink isn't being updated Just curious, will it be changed back? For I guess it should rather be fixed on

Bug#177460: debconf specification not published

2003-01-20 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 12:22:20AM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote: Package: www.debian.org The debconf specification is part of Policy, but it is not included in the Packaging section of the Developers' Corner. Man, the moment I make links to those things, people start filing bugs how

Bug#177460: debconf specification not published

2003-01-20 Thread Matt Kraai
Howdy, I get a 404 when I try to access the specification[1]. Matt 1. http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/debconf_specification.html

Re: Moving from ftp://ftp.debian.org to http://ftp.debian.org

2003-01-20 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 12:01:01PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: Now, the facts: today, as probably you noted because of my huge number of commits, I changed all the references of ftp://ftp.debian.org to http://ftp.debian.org in the English repository, but committing all the other

Adding ispell and wordlist policy reference in developers corner

2003-01-20 Thread Agustín Martín Domingo
Hi all, New policy for ispell dictionaries and wordlists is already official in Debian and it would be a good thing to have an entry for it at the developers http://www.debian.org/devel/index.en.html www page. Somethink like --- ispell and

Re: event reports visibility

2003-01-20 Thread Martin Schulze
Gerfried Fuchs wrote: * Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-01-18 09:22]: So... are you going to commit your code and I should with mine and see whether it works as expected? Which my code? It is committed already. If you mean the changes to have the define-tag report in the event

Re: Moving from ftp://ftp.debian.org to http://ftp.debian.org

2003-01-20 Thread Davide Puricelli
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 12:01:01PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: Could you KINDLY think of bumping the translation-check headers of the translations that are uptodate too? Sorry, if you like to do mass changes go ahead, I've done them myself, too. But _pretty please_ BUMP THAT FSCKING

Re: translation of searchtmpl/search.wml

2003-01-20 Thread Denis Barbier
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 06:22:08PM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote: Hi, From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Denis Barbier) Subject: Re: translation of searchtmpl/search.wml Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 21:46:34 +0100 At first glance it sounds very good, but I am not sure this is the way to go, because

Re: UPPERCASE surname?

2003-01-20 Thread Craig Small
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 01:32:58AM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: I think if the document is in English, then English style is just fine. The uppercase stuff may be appropriate in e.g. French, but I don't believe there's any rule in English that requires it. No rule, but there is a convention.

Re: Debian WWW CVS commit by atterer: webwml/english/CD/jigdo-cd index.wml

2003-01-20 Thread Richard Atterer
[CCd to Phil - I've changed the website to use 3.0_r1 instead of current for linking to the jigdo files.] On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 12:36:39PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: Just curious, will it be changed back? For I guess it should rather be fixed on the server than on our pages (and having

Re: translation of searchtmpl/search.wml

2003-01-20 Thread Craig Small
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 11:45:17PM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote: PS. The content negotiation http://search.debian.org/new/index.en.cgi http://search.debian.org/new/index.fr.cgi seems not work well. Though I am afraid I am wrong, how about renaming

Re: translation of searchtmpl/search.wml

2003-01-20 Thread Tomohiro KUBOTA
Hi, From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Craig Small) Subject: Re: translation of searchtmpl/search.wml Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 09:13:57 +1100 It was before you replied to that mail (or maybe another?). Essentially I was incorrect. mnogosearch *stores* its indexing in UTF-8 but needs all those flags to

知道 野蛮的 万网(www.net.cn) !!!!

2003-01-20 Thread 万网违反合同
野蛮的 万网(www.net.cn) 因为万网得蛮横无理,造成本人使用了3年的域名被人家使用。 本人列出 万网的 对用户不公平的地方 1,2002年初 擅自更改合同服务款,变相增加收费,全国专业it 媒体已经报道过。 2,2002年初 违反合同条款 提高域名的收费 原合同 70, 现在收费是150。 3,客户注册的域名信息里面,所有域名管理信息为万网的信息,没有提供客户的信息。 4,内部管理混乱,同一个服务问题 要几十次人次 才能得到一个 模糊的回答。 5,随心所欲的屏蔽客户域名(就因为收到3份邮件,没有警告就屏蔽了),没有违法任何合同条款。