On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 11:15:14AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * doug jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-20 18:53]:
> > So, I will make those corrections and send the patches back to the list
> > to be commited, or bug reports to www.debian.org, or ...?
>
> Send them to the list, IMHO no need
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:51:43 -0600
Debian WWW CVS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> CVSROOT: /cvs/webwml
> Module name: webwml
> Changes by: joey03/07/30 09:51:43
>
> Modified files:
> english/security/2003: dsa-354.wml
>
> Log message:
> Corrected the bug number. Where does
Thanks for your reply !
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > Have you considered masking e-mail addresses on the public
> > web archives so that spam robots won't pick them up ?
>
> Yes, we have considered it but haven't yet found a way that will please
> most. One benefit of the arch
* Tormod Volden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-30 13:59]:
> Have you considered masking e-mail addresses on the public
> web archives so that spam robots won't pick them up ?
Yes, we have considered it but haven't yet found a way that will please
most. One benefit of the archives is that people can
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 02:04:40PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 01:03:23PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Craig Small wrote:
> > > Someone has been nice and closed all my bugs for me and every other
> > > developer.
> > >
> > > Eg
> > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 02:04:40PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 01:03:23PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > Someone has been nice and closed all my bugs for me and every other
> > > developer.
> > >
> > > Eg
> > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Wor
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 09:54:44PM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
> Someone has been nice and closed all my bugs for me and every other
> developer.
>
> Eg
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Works for me ...
Debian Bug report logs: maintainer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Note that maintainers m
Hi,
Have you considered masking e-mail addresses on the public
web archives so that spam robots won't pick them up ?
For instance, my work e-mail address made it into this page:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-m68k-changes/2001/debian-devel-m68k-changes-200106/msg00387.html
and I am afraid I
Someone has been nice and closed all my bugs for me and every other
developer.
Eg
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian Bug report logs: maintainer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
N
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 01:03:23PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Someone has been nice and closed all my bugs for me and every other
> > developer.
> >
> > Eg
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Works for me ...
For a moment there I could reproduce it. It's possible that th
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Matt Kraai wrote:
> > I suggest replacing this:
> >
> >
> > Even when searching on subwords is not checked, appending an
> > asterisk, '*', to the end of a keyword will allow subword searching
> > for that word.
> >
> >
> > with this:
> >
> >
> > Searc
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 10:46:26AM +0200, Tommy Dugandzic wrote:
> s/because are encumbered by/because they are encumbered by/
Thanks, done.
--
Matt
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 11:05:48AM +0200, Tommy Dugandzic wrote:
> I suggest replacing this:
>
>
> Even when searching on subwords is not checked, appending an
> asterisk, '*', to the end of a keyword will allow subword searching
> for that word.
>
>
> with this:
>
>
> Sear
I suggest replacing this:
Even when searching on subwords is not checked, appending an
asterisk, '*', to the end of a keyword will allow subword searching
for that word.
with this:
Searching for subwords is not checked unless you append an asterix ("*")
to the end of a key
s/because are encumbered by/because they are encumbered by/
--
Regards,
Tommy - http://www.geocities.com/todu5811/autosignature?1125
RFC2440 fingerprint: 4445 BB5E AE67 A0C9 7B25 5715 F938 88CB 7A10 2364
* Arash Zeini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-30 10:53]:
> While translating date.fa.po I noticed this and other similar strings:
>
> q{[%]d [%]s-[%]d [%]s}, $sday, $smon_str, $eday, $emon_str
>
> Am I right in my assumption that these strings are not to be customized in
> any way?
Partly right.
Arash Zeini:
> Am I right in my assumption that these strings are not to be customized in
> any way?
They're there exactly to *be* customized. Did you read the comments?
--
\\//
Peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/
I do not read or respond to mail with HTML attachments.
Hi All,
While translating date.fa.po I noticed this and other similar strings:
q{[%]d [%]s-[%]d [%]s}, $sday, $smon_str, $eday, $emon_str
Am I right in my assumption that these strings are not to be customized in
any way?
Greetings,
Arash
--
The FarsiKDE Project
www.farsikde.org
18 matches
Mail list logo
