Re: Request: Using Rubik Webfont from Google Fonts Directory in debian.org

On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 12:51 PM anon notmyfault64 wrote: > As web evolves, more websites are employing webfonts. This way, > websites can set the desired fonts without having visitors to install > those fonts, by embedding fonts into web pages. A better approach is to use the browser's default

Request: Using Rubik Webfont from Google Fonts Directory in debian.org

Dear debian.org webmasters, As web evolves, more websites are employing webfonts. This way, websites can set the desired fonts without having visitors to install those fonts, by embedding fonts into web pages. One of good font candidates is Rubik. It is used on fandom.com wikis, Instagram, and

Re: Re: Request: Adding Contact Form in Contact Us page

On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 7:21 AM anon notmyfault64 wrote: > The vulnerability you mentioned is when contact form doesn't have proper spam > protection. > > they may have reCAPTCHA validation The Debian website doesn't use dynamic content, doesn't use JavaScript and doesn't pull in resources from

Re: The mugshot package has been removed

On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 3:57 PM Tomás Senabre González wrote: > The mugshot package has been removed from the GNU/Debian Buster repositories, > but the XFCE whiskermenu plugin needs this package to edit the user's > profile. Whiskermenu issues an error because it does not find mugshot >

Re: Re: Request: Adding Contact Form in Contact Us page

The vulnerability you mentioned is when contact form doesn't have proper spam protection. In contact forms created in WordPress (e.g. WPForms), they may have reCAPTCHA validation, which submitters must click "I'm not a robot" checkbox and must select squares which contain a particular object (in

Re: packages.d.o: gcc package search is resulting in "Your keyword was too generic"

Carsten Schoenert wrote: Hello Phil, Am 13.06.19 um 16:14 schrieb Phil Endecott: ... So the output of the search is mostly correct. I disagree; "Your keyword was too generic" suggests that there must be thousands of packages matching the search term, not zero. well, than you didn't have

Re: packages.d.o: gcc package search is resulting in "Your keyword was too generic"

Hello Michael, Am 13.06.19 um 16:35 schrieb Michael Kesper: [snip] But there are no backports of the gcc versions available! So the output of the search is mostly correct. > > I think packages.d.o. could be a little bit smarter here. > We _know_ for a fact that stretch-backports is a

Re: packages.d.o: gcc package search is resulting in "Your keyword was too generic"

Hello Phil, Am 13.06.19 um 16:14 schrieb Phil Endecott: ... >> So the output of the search is mostly correct. > > I disagree; "Your keyword was too generic" suggests that there must be > thousands of packages matching the search term, not zero. well, than you didn't have clicked on the link

Re: packages.d.o: gcc package search is resulting in "Your keyword was too generic"

Hi Carsten, On 13.06.19 16:20, Carsten Schoenert wrote: > Hello Michael, > > Am 13.06.19 um 15:47 schrieb Michael Kesper: >>> This list is about the Debian websites and the maintenance of them, so> >>> unfortunately you are on the wrong list for asking such questions. >> >> Unfortunately,

Re: packages.d.o: gcc package search is resulting in "Your keyword was too generic"

Hi Carsten, Carsten Schoenert wrote: Hello Phil, This list is about the Debian websites and the maintenance of them, so unfortunately you are on the wrong list for asking such questions. For better fitting support channels please visit https://www.debian.org/support The error does come

Re: packages.d.o: gcc package search is resulting in "Your keyword was too generic"

Hello Michael, Am 13.06.19 um 15:47 schrieb Michael Kesper: >> This list is about the Debian websites and the maintenance of them, so> >> unfortunately you are on the wrong list for asking such questions. > > Unfortunately, that's the only address given visibly on the packages.d.o site: > To

Re: packages.d.o: gcc package search is resulting in "Your keyword was too generic"

Hi Carsten, On 13.06.19 15:39, Carsten Schoenert wrote: > Am 13.06.19 um 13:55 schrieb Phil Endecott: >> Dear debian-www@lists.debian.org, >> >> I'm not sure if you're the right contact for this, but if not >> maybe you can redirect me. > > This list is about the Debian websites and the

packages.d.o: gcc package search is resulting in "Your keyword was too generic"

Hello Phil, you have chosen to create an also really generic subject! :) It a bit ironically as you complaining about the outcome while doing a package search. So I modified the subject to something more specific. Am 13.06.19 um 13:55 schrieb Phil Endecott: > Dear debian-www@lists.debian.org, >

Re: "Your keyword was too generic"

Hi Phil, On 13.06.19 13:55, Phil Endecott wrote: > Dear debian-www@lists.debian.org, > > I'm not sure if you're the right contact for this, but if not > maybe you can redirect me. I don't know either. > I find the package search web pages at packages.debian.org are > very often useless,

"Your keyword was too generic"

Dear debian-www@lists.debian.org, I'm not sure if you're the right contact for this, but if not maybe you can redirect me. I find the package search web pages at packages.debian.org are very often useless, because I get the message "Your keyword was too generic". Specifically, today I found

Re: The mugshot package has been removed

Hello Tomás Senabre, Am 13.06.19 um 09:57 schrieb Tomás Senabre González: > Hello, > The mugshot package has been removed from the GNU/Debian Buster > repositories, but the XFCE whiskermenu plugin needs this package to edit > the user's profile. Whiskermenu issues an error because it does not

The mugshot package has been removed

Hello, The mugshot package has been removed from the GNU/Debian Buster repositories, but the XFCE whiskermenu plugin needs this package to edit the user's profile. Whiskermenu issues an error because it does not find mugshot installed in the system. Thanks for your job Tomas -- Tomás Senabre