Bug#440628: Working and broken again

2012-08-30 Thread Francesco Poli
the transition document! . Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE pgp368Z6KiFUS.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#238245: license choice - consensus on dual MIT/GPL-2+ ?

2012-01-21 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 11:08:55 -0400 David Prévot wrote: [...] Le 20/01/2012 13:53, Francesco Poli a écrit : On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 23:51:55 +0100 Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 07:42:05PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: If this is what you mean, then it should be noted

Bug#238245: license choice - consensus on dual MIT/GPL-2+ ?

2012-01-21 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 12:57:59 -0400 David Prévot wrote: Le 21/01/2012 12:28, Francesco Poli a écrit : On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 11:08:55 -0400 David Prévot wrote: I would use the classical Expat URL for the Expat/MIT license: […] Moreover, as far as the Expat license is concerned, I would

Bug#238245: license choice - consensus on dual MIT/GPL-2 ?

2012-01-20 Thread Francesco Poli
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 23:51:55 +0100 Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 07:42:05PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: However, I think you should clarify what you mean by dual-licensing. Dual-licensing is usually intended to mean that both licenses are being offered

Bug#238245: license choice - consensus on dual MIT/GPL-2 ?

2012-01-18 Thread Francesco Poli
to avoid confusion. Please disambiguate: which one is the intended meaning? -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt New GnuPG key, see the transition document! . Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF

Bug#388141: Ask contributors a permission to relicense

2012-01-15 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 14:45:20 -0400 David Prévot wrote: Le 09/01/2012 17:39, Francesco Poli a écrit : [...] Instead of continuing our discussion based on impressions, we just issued a quick poll [P.-S.]: it confirms that not everyone will agree with a copyright reassignment, but almost all

Bug#388141: Debian official web site is still non-free

2012-01-09 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 22:23:57 +0100 Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 10:05:00PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: Good point, but where does it claim so? In the footer of every page. My quote: Copyright © 1997-2011 SPI and others; See license terms can be found

Bug#388141: Debian official web site is still non-free

2012-01-09 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 23:17:02 +0100 Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 10:40:35PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: I think that this is exactly what people opposing to copyright assignment want to avoid: giving permission to re-license under yet unknown terms. I don't think you

Bug#388141: Debian official web site is still non-free

2012-01-08 Thread Francesco Poli
! . Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE pgpxNNptWCSGH.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#388141: Debian official web site is still non-free

2012-01-08 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 21:50:17 +0100 Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 07:38:24PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: Secondly, the web site claims [3] to be copyrighted by SPI, while it's not [5]. As a side point: the above claim of yours is no longer true, see #632175. The web

Bug#388141: Debian official web site is still non-free

2012-01-08 Thread Francesco Poli
://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt New GnuPG key, see the transition document! . Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE pgpsQ8UnrRHEp.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Volunteer to help with mass-relicensing of website when the time comes to do so (was Re: Proposed plan (and license) for the webpage relicensing)

2011-06-01 Thread Francesco Poli
! . Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE pgpzz0DJZaucK.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: copyright and changelog files not yet on packages.d.o

2011-04-19 Thread Francesco Poli
On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 09:07:01 +0200 Simon Paillard wrote: [...] On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 19:29:53 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote: [...] http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/a/apt-listbugs/apt-listbugs_0.1.4/changelog http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/a/apt-listbugs/apt

Re: copyright and changelog files not yet on packages.d.o

2011-04-13 Thread Francesco Poli
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 19:29:53 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote: Hi all, version 0.1.4 of package apt-listbugs was uploaded to unstable on last Saturday, and it's correctly shown at http://packages.debian.org/sid/apt-listbugs However, links to its copyright and changelog files seem to be still

Re: Analysis of the Free Art License 1.3

2011-01-23 Thread Francesco Poli
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 21:48:32 -0400 David Prévot wrote: [...] Hi, Hello! [...] Le 25/01/2009 07:55, Francesco Poli a écrit : On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:41:18 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote: May I dig up this almost one year old thread, I would say almost two years old, but I digress

Re: logo license with debian - no warranty missing?

2010-06-27 Thread Francesco Poli
pdebuild hook scripts? . Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4 pgp9JboIJbvak.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Licenses links broken

2008-07-21 Thread Francesco Poli
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:30:09 +0200 Laura Creighton wrote: In a message of Thu, 17 Jul 2008 23:04:17 +0200, Francesco Poli writes: snip Actually, the MIT_License wikipedia page currently includes the Expat/MIT license, not the X11/MIT license. I would suggest to use the following link

Re: Licenses links broken

2008-07-17 Thread Francesco Poli
... Please note that http://www.xfree86.org/3.3.6/COPYRIGHT2.html#3 is close, but not equal to the license I used to know as the X11 license -- http://frx.netsons.org/doc/index.html#nanodocs The nano-document series is here! . Francesco Poli

Bug#339837: Publishing more data could maybe help

2006-04-24 Thread Francesco Poli
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 00:31:45 +0200 Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 11:57:00AM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: I think that a page very similar to http://spohr.debian.org/~joeyh/testing-security.html would help making the public aware of how things are going

Bug#339837: Publishing more data could maybe help

2006-04-23 Thread Francesco Poli
disclosure allows for more rapid and better solutions to | security problems. Please consider this possibility. -- :-( This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS? ;-) .. Francesco Poli

Re: Proposed plan (and license) for the webpage relicensing

2006-04-21 Thread Francesco Poli
? ;-) .. Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4 Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4 pgp6bhzvLY3Lf.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Proposed plan (and license) for the webpage relicensing

2006-04-20 Thread Francesco Poli
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 01:37:43 +0200 Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 12:56:57AM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: I suggest using a BSD-style license. The attached license is such a license. It is based on the FreeBSD documentation license [3

Re: Proposed plan (and license) for the webpage relicensing

2006-04-20 Thread Francesco Poli
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 07:52:47 +1000 Andrew Donnellan wrote: On 4/21/06, Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How about saying either first or last lines? What if both first and last lines are reserved for other uses? What about first or last usable lines in the source language

Re: Proposed plan (and license) for the webpage relicensing

2006-04-19 Thread Francesco Poli
? ;-) .. Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4 Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4 pgpSJyWgxmL28.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Proposed plan (and license) for the webpage relicensing

2006-04-19 Thread Francesco Poli
? ;-) .. Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4 Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4 pgpfyZiXk7MKU.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#238245: Debian website's copyright and license suggestions?

2005-10-17 Thread Francesco Poli
? ;-) .. Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4 Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4 pgpFITXQtQOpV.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#238245: Debian website's copyright and license suggestions?

2005-10-16 Thread Francesco Poli
! I've Cc'ed the bug report about the issue, but Mail-followups does not contain bug report. Add it if needed, please. Added. -- :-( This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS? ;-) .. Francesco Poli

Re: Please fix and update non-free-docs.html

2005-09-06 Thread Francesco Poli
On Tue, 6 Sep 2005 02:39:58 +0200 Frank Lichtenheld wrote: On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 12:18:31AM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: Hi! I found a typo right in the title of http://packages.debian.net/non-free-docs.html s/Docoumentation/Documentation/ The page was more a experiment

Please fix and update non-free-docs.html

2005-09-05 Thread Francesco Poli
#238245)... Do you agree? P.S.: please Cc: me on replies, as I am not a subscriber of this list. Thanks. -- :-( This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS? ;-) .. Francesco Poli GnuPG

Re: removing the debian-legal website stuff?

2005-05-26 Thread Francesco Poli
this before, but I am still not up-to-date with wml. Here is my suggested text: [...] I read it and it seems quite good. Well done! :) -- :-( This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS? ;-) .. Francesco

Re: Revamping the debian-legal website (was Re: removing the debian-legal website stuff?

2005-05-26 Thread Francesco Poli
the information exists, but just has to be integrated. Great! This is really appreciated, indeed. :-) -- :-( This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS? ;-) .. Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID

Bug#297040: www.debian.org: No php4 copyright file via packages.debian.org

2005-02-26 Thread Francesco Poli
Package: www.debian.org Version: N/A; reported 2005-02-26 Severity: normal I cannot retrieve php4 copyright file via web. Directing my browser to http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/p/php4/php4_4.3.10-8/php4.copyright takes me to a warning that There was no copyright file found in

Footer overlapping

2005-01-06 Thread Francesco Poli
for maintaining such an important resource! ;-) -- Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday. .. Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4 Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5

Re: Little bug in webpages

2004-09-20 Thread Francesco Poli
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 03:48:16 -0700 Matt Kraai wrote: Thanks for reporting this. I've fixed it, and the web site should be updated within a few hours. You're welcome! After all, I must do my daily mooing, right? ;-) -- | GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4 | $ fortune Francesco |

Little bug in webpages

2004-09-19 Thread Francesco Poli
Hi Debian webmaster(s)! I am a Debian user and enthusiast from Florence, Italy. I noted a little typo in http://www.debian.org/intro/organization In section _Support and Infrastructure_, item _User support_, nearly all the e-mail addresses seem to have a double @domain.tld part! I think