Re: unoffical debian logos, banners and covers

2002-09-26 Thread Raul Miller
Le Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 04:21:19PM +0300, Volkan YAZICI ?crivait: there are currently 9 logos, 13 banners, 3 vertical banners, 5 cd covers, 2 workouts adress is http://www.linuks.mine.nu/volkany/ Previously Raphael Hertzog wrote: They are really nice, I like them. Wichert Akkerman

Bug#99439: Change in committee membership

2001-05-31 Thread Raul Miller
Package: www.debian.org Version: 2001-05-31 Severity: wishlist On http://www.debian.org/intro/organization Klee Dienes is no longer a committee member (he was removed a couple weeks ago). Jason Gunthorpe replaces him (he was officially confirmed, today). Thanks, -- Raul

Bug#94992: Wichert is now a committee member

2001-04-24 Thread Raul Miller
reassign 94992 lists.debian.org -- On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 12:41:18AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: (doesn't work anymore ;) Hm.. I suppose I should have piped the thing through tail. Yeah but this isn't a www.debian.org issue, rather an aliases file issue, or something? Er.. Reassigning to

Bug#94992: Wichert is now a committee member

2001-04-23 Thread Raul Miller
Package: www.debian.org On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 03:05:20PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: Raul Miller wrote: Wichert Akkerman is now a technical committee member. Please add him to the various lists for this (moderator and of course subscriber to the debian-ctte list, and the committee

Bug#94992: Wichert is now a committee member

2001-04-23 Thread Raul Miller
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 12:19:32PM -0500, James A. Treacy wrote: [snip] This message is being sent to open a bug report. Why? If it so he is added to the Tech. Committee in intro/organization, you are too late. You may have noticed that the web team was included in the original mail.

Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constitution A.5

2000-10-11 Thread Raul Miller
member Raul Miller I don't know where this came from. No one ever voted for Ian as committee chairman. Here's the votes: Dale Scheetzhttp://lists.debian.org/debian-ctte-9908/msg00102.html Ian Jackson http://lists.debian.org/debian-ctte-9908/msg00057.html Klee Dienes http

Re: Raul's banners etc

2000-02-08 Thread Raul Miller
[Note: In this context, I'm not Raul.] On Mon, Feb 07, 2000 at 02:46:09PM -0800, Darren O. Benham wrote: I might not be in the popular thought here, but I would prefer to see them Public Domain'd. The reason? If they are installed in a page that isn't licensed the same, They would need

Re: no link to the y2k page?

1999-10-16 Thread Raul Miller
On Sat, Oct 16, 1999 at 08:57:43PM +1000, Craig Small wrote: Are we talking about the same page? scooter$ lynx -source http://www.debian.org/y2k/index.html | grep -i option The subject is links to that page, not links from that page. I gotta run though (plane to catch). -- Raul

Re: no link to the y2k page?

1999-10-12 Thread Raul Miller
On Tue, Oct 12, 1999 at 11:11:34AM -0400, James A. Treacy wrote: Anyone care to spend a little time looking into some reorganization? We need to make sure that information is organized so that it is easy to find. I've been playing around with it a bit -- not sure I'm going to come up with

Configuring APT

1999-07-15 Thread Raul Miller
We need a reference list of aptable archive references on the web site. I know that some of the information on this list would duplicate the ftp mirrors list, but only some of it. I was under the impression that someone (Jason?) had already done most of the work for creating such a thing. Does

Re: unclear formulations in license_disc.wml

1998-10-14 Thread Raul Miller
--On Tue, Oct 13, 1998 1:41 pm +0200 Philipp Frauenfelder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone who releases software using the GPL does not consider these restrictions bad, because it prevents others from making money off of their hard work while allowing others to use it. I understand it

Re: unclear formulations in license_disc.wml

1998-10-14 Thread Raul Miller
Darren Benham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oo...I like that even better.. 'cept there are too many their's Well, there's only one, but maybe it would be clearer with the word that? Anyone who releases software using the GPL does not consider these restrictions bad, because it forces