* Andrew Shugg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-04-18 02:10]:
> Josip Rodin said:
>> You've clearly outvoted me on this, but I maintain that it will be me who
>> will have to explain it if someone files a bug about it.
A bug about broken package descriptions? Joy, you are not responsible
for broken pac
Josip Rodin said:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 05:31:17PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > Joy, do you really insist on changing the _content_ of the package
> > descriptions which are text/plain, to make them show _different_
> > informations than the various package management tools do?? That is a
On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 05:31:17PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Joy, do you really insist on changing the _content_ of the package
> descriptions which are text/plain, to make them show _different_
> informations than the various package management tools do?? That is a
> bad thing and I guess y
Denis Barbier said:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 10:18:27PM +0800, Andrew Shugg wrote:
> [...]
> > To clarify what I outlined in #186740, if you were to start with this
> > sort of string:
> >
> > &foo blah &
> >
> > you would end up with this in the HTML:
> >
> > &foo blah &
>
On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 10:18:27PM +0800, Andrew Shugg wrote:
> Denis Barbier said:
> > Nope, ampersnads must be escaped, period.
> > Example:
> > Description: escape HTML special characters in plain text
> >EscapeHTML converts all &, < and > characters into &, < and
> >>.
> >
> > There
On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 10:18:27PM +0800, Andrew Shugg wrote:
[...]
> To clarify what I outlined in #186740, if you were to start with this
> sort of string:
>
> &foo blah &
>
> you would end up with this in the HTML:
>
> &foo blah &
^
No, it should be & sinc
* Andrew Shugg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-04-16 22:18]:
> To clarify what I outlined in #186740, if you were to start with this
> sort of string:
>
> &foo blah &
>
> you would end up with this in the HTML:
>
> &foo blah &
>
> which would be rendered in the browser (ie entities decoded
Denis Barbier said:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 06:56:23PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > I think, the solution presented by Andrew Shugg in #186740 is the
> > right way to go.
>
> Nope, ampersnads must be escaped, period.
> Example:
> Description: escape HTML special characters in plain text
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 06:56:23PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 05:53:47PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 04:39:23PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > > No, within plain text one writes http://foo.org/?a=1&b=2, escaping is only
> > > performed for s
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 06:56:23PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > > No, within plain text one writes http://foo.org/?a=1&b=2, escaping is only
> > > performed for some other formats (SGML and co).
> > > So unless descriptions are going to be considered as HTML text, this fix
> > > is meaningfu
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 05:53:47PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 04:39:23PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > No, within plain text one writes http://foo.org/?a=1&b=2, escaping is only
> > performed for some other formats (SGML and co).
> > So unless descriptions are going to be
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 04:39:23PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > > > > + $long_desc =~ s/\&/\&\;/go;
> > > >
> > > > That sounds like a fix for another bug, and it doesn't look like it
> > > > would
> > > > actually handle the read &s in descriptions...
> > >
> > > You're right,
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 07:58:05PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
[...]
> > > > + $long_desc =~ s/\&/\&\;/go;
> > >
> > > That sounds like a fix for another bug, and it doesn't look like it would
> > > actually handle the read &s in descriptions...
> >
> > You're right, that this line (a
* Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-03-14 15:16]:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 10:12:14PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
>> Well, I think in principle it's much better to just match until the first
>> closing bracket since IME such things are less prone to errors. Of course,
>> if someone found U
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 10:12:14PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 09:27:28PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > Ok. Let's elaborate a little. Sorry if it's too long.
>
> Oh, I understood perfectly what you said, I just meant to say that I thought
> the original code preserved
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 09:27:28PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > > > The right fix would be simply
> > > > $long_desc =~ s,<(?:URL:\s*)?(http://[^>]+)\s*>,\<\;$1\>\;,go;
> > > >
> > > > Right?
> > >
> > > Yours would do also. The main difference in result is that you delete
> > > the 'URL:'
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 07:58:05PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 06:46:35PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > > The right fix would be simply
> > > $long_desc =~ s,<(?:URL:\s*)?(http://[^>]+)\s*>,\<\;$1\>\;,go;
> > >
> > > Right?
> >
> > Yours would do also. The main diffe
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 06:46:35PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > > --- pages.pl30 Jan 2003 14:43:59 - 1.9
> > > +++ pages.pl13 Mar 2003 14:30:56 -
> > > - $long_desc =~
> > > s,<((URL:)?http://[\S~-]+?/?)>,\<\;$1\>\;,go;
> > > + $long_desc =~
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 06:27:15PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 03:42:54PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > tags 181872 + patch
> > thanks
> >
> > [Problem of 'http://scummvm.sf.net/compatibility.php>'
> > being converted to
> > ' > href="http://scummvm.sf.net/compatibil
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 03:42:54PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> tags 181872 + patch
> thanks
>
> [Problem of 'http://scummvm.sf.net/compatibility.php>'
> being converted to
> ' href="http://scummvm.sf.net/compatibility.php>">http://scummvm.sf.net/compatibility.php>']
>
> The following patch
tags 181872 + patch
thanks
[Problem of 'http://scummvm.sf.net/compatibility.php>'
being converted to
'http://scummvm.sf.net/compatibility.php>">http://scummvm.sf.net/compatibility.php>']
The following patch should fix the problem. It allows whitespaces
beetween "http://";. I've also added some m
21 matches
Mail list logo
