Re: commercial code Vs Commercial software

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 3:21 AM, Mehrdad Linux wrote: > i think it must be fix it is wrong “free software” is a matter of liberty, > not price > > why it write commercial code is that you can't fix bugs? > why it write source code is not available? > > i thinks it must be fix and it is wrong

Re: commercial code Vs Commercial software

Hi, Yes, I think it is a bug. Have you already sent a bug report? If not, I will send it when I have time. (Maybe on weekend) Cheers, Alex On 28/10/2015, Mehrdad Linux wrote: > OK it is very good thanks > > 1 : you accepted free software can be commercial software > 2

Re: commercial code Vs Commercial software

really thanks end of article write To report a problem with the web site, e-mail debian-www@lists.debian.org. and you are only person answer me how can i report a bug ? thanks :D On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Alex Vong wrote: > Hi, > > Yes, I think it is a bug.

Re: commercial code Vs Commercial software

Well, there is a pseudo package called `www.debian.org'. It is like a "hidden" feature, I don't remember anywhere mentioning it. In , you can see all the bug reports filed against it. Debian Wiki has a page on how to report bug

Re: commercial code Vs Commercial software

thanks i only want to learn how can i report a bug i try to report if i don't successfully i send e-mail to you :D thanks On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:38 PM, Alex Vong wrote: > Well, there is a pseudo package called `www.debian.org'. It is like a > "hidden" feature, I

Re: commercial code Vs Commercial software

thanks for your answer maybe you don't read my email :D look at title read this paragraph carefully Distribution of source code. One of the problems with most commercial code is that you can't fix bugs or customize it since the source code is not available. Also, the company may decide to stop

Re: commercial code Vs Commercial software

I see what you mean now, thanks for clarification! IMO, commercial code is simply code of commercial software. Free code and proprietary code can be defined similarly as well. I am showing an counter example that RHEL is "made up" of commercial code but is free software at the same time. Does this

Re: commercial code Vs Commercial software

OK it is very good thanks 1 : you accepted free software can be commercial software 2 : you seed commercial code is code of commercial software 3 : free software is kind of software have Four Freedoms (run,study,redistribute,improve) OK look at this link in Debian web site

Re: commercial code Vs Commercial software

Hi, Indeed, RHEL is FOSS and commercial at the same time. How do the others think? Cheers, Alex On 26/10/2015, Mehrdad Linux wrote: > hi > > in page What Does Free Mean? > in paragraph 6 part 3 > > write > > Distribution of

commercial code Vs Commercial software

hi in page What Does Free Mean? in paragraph 6 part 3 write Distribution of source code. One of the problems with most commercial code is that you can't fix bugs or customize it since the source code is not available. Also, the company may decide to