On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 04:32:31PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Would it be possible to add etch-m68k to the interface at
packages.debian.org? That could be helpful.
Certainly.
I have two questions though:
1) etch-m68k contains a source/ directory which is currently
identical to the one of
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 11:23:13AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 04:32:31PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Would it be possible to add etch-m68k to the interface at
packages.debian.org? That could be helpful.
Certainly.
I have two questions though:
1) etch-m68k
Hi,
Would it be possible to add etch-m68k to the interface at
packages.debian.org? That could be helpful.
If that's not possible, can someone explain to me how I can set up a
similar site on my own system?
Thanks,
--
Fun will now commence
-- Seven Of Nine, Ashes to Ashes, stardate 53679.4
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 02:04:23PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:44:45AM +0100, Simon Paillard wrote:
* http://packages.debian.org/oldstable/doc/linuxcookbook is not up to
date Last Modified: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 so the fixed link is not
displayed.
[..]
How to
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 07:59:55PM +0100, Simon Paillard wrote:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 02:12:59PM +0100, Matt Kraai wrote:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 09:16:12AM +0100, Simon Paillard wrote:
To the list: is there a way to specify a different set of mirrors for
oldstable ?
The scripts
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 02:12:59PM +0100, Matt Kraai wrote:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 09:16:12AM +0100, Simon Paillard wrote:
To the list: is there a way to specify a different set of mirrors for
oldstable ?
The scripts that are used to generate packages.debian.org can be found
at
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 07:59:55PM +0100, Simon Paillard wrote:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 02:12:59PM +0100, Matt Kraai wrote:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 09:16:12AM +0100, Simon Paillard wrote:
To the list: is there a way to specify a different set of mirrors for
oldstable ?
The scripts
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 04:19:42PM +0100, Matt Kraai wrote:
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 03:28:52PM +0800, martin wrote:
I am trying to install an old library: libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1
[...]
If I follow the links on packages.debian.org website to this link:
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 04:39:55PM +0100, Simon Paillard wrote:
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 04:19:42PM +0100, Matt Kraai wrote:
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 03:28:52PM +0800, martin wrote:
I am trying to install an old library: libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1
[...]
If I follow the links on
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 364312 confirmed
Bug#364312: www.debian.org: new packages.d.o/changelog:$PACKAGE doesn't work
with libraries
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
tags 364312 confirmed
thanks
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 01:37:34PM -0300, Damián Viano wrote:
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
I love this feature, but found that libraries should get special
treatment, currently
http://packages.debian.org/changelog:libcaca-dev
gets translated
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
It would be great if individual files within [source|binary] packages
could be accessed by visiting some PDO URL pkg=foopath=bar. The
search_contents.pl left-hand side should be hyperlinks to that URL.
This would be useful for accessing eg. a TODO list
Hi,
AFAICS there has been no discussion about this on the lists.
Problem description: packages.debian.org/${PACKAGE} links to source
package files. If the client accepts compressed content, the web server
serves ${PACKAGE}.{diff,orig.tar}.gz as text/plain, with HTTP
content-encoding:
Hi,
here's a minor correction to my post.
Nikolaus Schulz wrote:
Problem description: packages.debian.org/${PACKAGE} links to source
package files. If the client accepts compressed content, the web server
serves ${PACKAGE}.{diff,orig.tar}.gz as text/plain, with HTTP
content-encoding:
, Debian Bugs database)
---BeginMessage---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: minor
packages.d.o shows packages in experimental when you search for any,
but it does not offer experimental in the list of distributions to
search.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:55:56AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 08:19:00PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
For some reason, m68k is no longer listed on the initial page with
distributions and versions that one gets if one searches for a package.
Could anyone please
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 08:19:00PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
For some reason, m68k is no longer listed on the initial page with
distributions and versions that one gets if one searches for a package.
Could anyone please have a look as to what's going on here?
I think I identified the
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
I love this feature, but found that libraries should get special
treatment, currently
http://packages.debian.org/changelog:libcaca-dev
gets translated to:
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/l/libcaca/current/changelog
but it should get
the problem with packages.d.o
packages.debian.org was disabled because the load of the machine hosting
it, saens.debian.org, which also is our only ftp.debian.org at the
moment, rose to 141.32, 135.82, 135.71, as on January 4th, due to
amongst others a cron job from packages.debian.org
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 02:47:05AM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 10:45:52AM +0100, Noèl Köthe wrote:
is it possible to get information about the problem with packages.d.o
packages.debian.org was disabled because the load of the machine hosting
On 2006-01-28 2101, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 02:47:05AM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 10:45:52AM +0100, Noèl Köthe wrote:
is it possible to get information about the problem with packages.d.o
packages.debian.org was disabled because
* Gustavo Franco:
I think we can inform about PTS and remove Google direct reference as in
the following message:
The PTS seems to have stopped updating, too. 8-(
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Florian Weimer wrote:
* Gustavo Franco:
I think we can inform about PTS and remove Google direct reference as in
the following message:
The PTS seems to have stopped updating, too. 8-(
I see, but the users could still check source files, package version and
subscribe to packages (?).
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
The actual p.d.o is down message is:
packages.debian.org is down at the moment.
We apologize for any inconvenience and hope to have service restored as
soon as possible.
We're working on resurrecting this service but it will take some time.
You
* Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-08-06 22:20]:
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: minor
packages.d.o shows packages in experimental when you search for any,
but it does not offer experimental in the list of distributions to
search.
It seems this has been fixed now.
--
Martin
On 2005-10-15T20:39:11+0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, that was new to me. It would be nice if someone would integrate
those po files from the directory with website translation statistics
pages, wouldn't it?
I did initial translation to Finnish and committed. Please let me know
if
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: minor
packages.d.o shows packages in experimental when you search for any,
but it does not offer experimental in the list of distributions to
search.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture
1CzgyH-X4-00; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 21:00:57 +0100
From: Jutta Wrage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: www.debian.org: CSS changes for www.debian.org and packages.d.o
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 21:00:57 +0100
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hello, guys. I would be interested in the search function at
packages.debian.org. Mithrandir says that it is a custom thing, but could you
please give me more information? Is there a copy in a public repository, or
simply I cannot access packages.debian.org because of gluck being down?
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 01:13:01PM +0200, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
Hello, guys. I would be interested in the search function at
packages.debian.org. Mithrandir says that it is a custom thing, but could you
please give me more information? Is there a copy in a public repository, or
El Jueves, 7 de Abril de 2005 13:42, Frank Lichtenheld escribió:
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 01:13:01PM +0200, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
Hello, guys. I would be interested in the search function at
packages.debian.org. Mithrandir says that it is a custom thing, but could
you please
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2005-02-11
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
For next changes in packages.d.o and www.d.o there are new css entries.
Please remind, that the changes will make it possible to increase
accessibility.
I added some things for the download table and a hidden
Howdy,
I think the following directive will prevent packages.d.o from
searching for a distribution if the trailing slash is omitted:
RewriteRule ^/(stable|testing|unstable|experimental)$ /$1/
Right?
--
Matt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 01:16:53PM +1100, Andrew Pollock wrote:
Hi,
If I go to http://packages.debian.org/unstable/admin/dstat and click on the
list of files link
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_contents.pl?searchmode=filelistword=dstatversion=unstablearch=all
I get an error
Your message dated Fri, 21 May 2004 10:13:59 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#249732: packages.d.o: lists source sizes as 'kB', but is
'bytes'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 249732 pending
Bug#249732: packages.d.o: lists source sizes as 'kB', but is 'bytes'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
tags 249732 pending
thanks
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 01:44:06AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: minor
On f.e. http://packages.debian.org/unstable/source/lintian , it says
'Size (in kB)', but the numbers are actually bytes, not kB's (lintian is
about
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: minor
On f.e. http://packages.debian.org/unstable/source/lintian , it says
'Size (in kB)', but the numbers are actually bytes, not kB's (lintian is
about 242kB, not 242MB).
--Jeroen
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
Your message dated Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:26:33 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line You can search on source packages now at least
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sun, 15 Feb 2004 02:15:31 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line How often is packages.d.o updated?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: pending
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 12:40:16PM +0100, Johannes Rohr wrote:
Hello everybody,
I wonder, how often packages.d.o is being
updated.
mozilla-locale-de-at 1.6-2 was uploaded 27 Jan.
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jan 2004 11:46:54 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#227831: www.debian.org: experimental packages missing from
packages.d.o
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yo!
As was mentioned in other mails, it is great to have that feature!
But the links don't work for packages with an epoch in the version string:
the URL contains the epoch, but the path of the real changelog omits the
epoch.
(Example:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 03:25:02PM +0100, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yo!
As was mentioned in other mails, it is great to have that feature!
But the links don't work for packages with an epoch in the version string:
the URL
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2004-01-13
Severity: normal
I'm not totally sure as to whether this is globally true but I've
recently come across two packages (cupsys (IIRC) and bind) for
which this was true ...
tags 227517 pending
thanks
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 08:56:16PM +0100, Florian Zumbiehl wrote:
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2004-01-13
Severity: normal
I'm not totally sure as to whether this is globally true but I've
recently come across two packages (cupsys (IIRC) and
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 227517 pending
Bug#227517: packages.d.o: Links to sources of packages that have security
updates point to the wrong location
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance
-0400
Received: from rfunk by marvin.local with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 14wpG2-00058I-00; Mon, 07 May 2001 13:57:18 -0400
From: Rob Funk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: packages.d.o: should give link to changelog
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.15
X
Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: packages.d.o/experimental/ table formatting bug
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.36
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Marcin Owsiany [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X
tags #219653 patch
thanks
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 10:21:24PM +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: minor
Compare http://packages.debian.org/unstable/ with
http://packages.debian.org/experimental/
You'll see an extra /dltd width=50% valign=topdl line, which
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags #219653 patch
Bug#219653: packages.d.o/experimental/ table formatting bug
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: minor
Compare http://packages.debian.org/unstable/ with
http://packages.debian.org/experimental/
You'll see an extra /dltd width=50% valign=topdl line, which
breaks formatting.
--
Marcin Owsiany [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://marcin.owsiany.pl/
GnuPG:
ydirson by kasba.alcove-fr with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 15qy2r-0001EY-00; Tue, 09 Oct 2001 16:39:45 +0200
From: Yann Dirson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: packages.d.o: substring search does not work
X-Reportbug-Version: 0.54.1
X-Mailer
ydirson by kasba.alcove-fr with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 15qy2r-0001EY-00; Tue, 09 Oct 2001 16:39:45 +0200
From: Yann Dirson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: packages.d.o: substring search does not work
X-Reportbug-Version: 0.54.1
X-Mailer
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle #207095 packages.debian.org: should give date of last update
Bug#207095: www.debian.org: no dates from package search
Changed Bug title.
retitle #207410 packages.debian.org: search_packages: xml output
Bug#207410: www.debian.org: xml output
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 12:35:29AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 03:48:51AM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote:
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 10:38:43PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 11:07:55PM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote:
about main:
Now we
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
The packages.d.o pages list the maintainer of the package. However,
it would be nice to additionally show the uploaders. Having uploaders
displays more prominently might encourage people to become
co-maintainers of packages.
As an example, alsa-base's
retitle 202157 packages.debian.org: pages should list uploaders
tags 202157 + confirmed
thanks
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 12:00:38PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
The packages.d.o pages list the maintainer of the package. However,
it would be nice to additionally show the uploaders. Having
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 202157 packages.debian.org: pages should list uploaders
Bug#202157: packages.d.o should list uploaders
Changed Bug title.
tags 202157 + confirmed
Bug#202157: packages.debian.org: pages should list uploaders
There were no tags set.
Tags added
Hi,
I'd like to report a bug on searching packages with packages.d.o
For example, the mozilla-tabextensions package can be found with
mozilla-tabextensions or mozilla as the keyword[1]. But it cannot be
found with tabextensions[2]. The subword option has been turned
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 11:54:39PM +0800, Wang WenRui wrote:
I'd like to report a bug on searching packages with packages.d.o
For example, the mozilla-tabextensions package can be found with
mozilla-tabextensions or mozilla as the keyword[1]. But it cannot be
found
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 12:35:29AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
These are for static pages. So we will have about 2 GB space and about
150.000 files for all distributions. Should be not a problem today
(? I'm not in the position to decide this though)
Given that there's only another 492
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 03:48:51AM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote:
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 10:38:43PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 11:07:55PM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote:
about main:
Now we translate only main. I will add contrib and non-free in future
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 10:38:43PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 11:07:55PM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote:
If you mail, don't forget CC: to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o.k., done this time
about main:
Now we translate only main. I will add contrib and non-free in
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 195105 packages.debian.org: search_packages: search is (temporarily)
broken
Bug#195105: packages.d.o: Search is broken
Changed Bug title.
# or should we close it instead?
tags 195105 + unreproducible
Bug#195105: packages.debian.org
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# okay, I'm dumb
retitle 195614 packages.debian.org: search_packages: not finding package
check
Bug#195614: packages.debian.org: search_packages: packages.debian.org: not
finding package check
Changed Bug title.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Changed Bug title.
retitle 172055 packages.debian.org: search_packages: search error on e.g.
openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-de
Bug#172055: packages.d.o: search error on e.g. openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-de
Changed Bug title.
retitle 135220 packages.debian.org: non-US, non-US/contrib and
non-US/non
/
If you code a new packages.d.o, please make translation possible!
Will try it. Parsing the translated Packages files will not be the
problem.
Please don't use the translated Packages. Better you use the newer
Translation files[1]. The new apt version will download this files and
use
On Sun, May 04, 2003 at 11:58:34PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Sat, May 03, 2003 at 07:06:17AM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote:
I mayself code only some i18n stuff. see
http://ddtp.debian.org/packages.debian.org/
If you code a new packages.d.o, please make translation possible
On Sat, May 03, 2003 at 07:06:17AM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote:
I mayself code only some i18n stuff. see
http://ddtp.debian.org/packages.debian.org/
If you code a new packages.d.o, please make translation possible!
Will try it. Parsing the translated Packages files will not be the
problem
On Sun, Apr 13, 2003 at 12:19:35AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
I've thought about the packages.d.o problems (only i386 and that...)
and I wonder if I could not do something for Debian and rewrite this
stuff. This is more a long term plan since I've no time in the next
weeks (perhaps even
Hi.
I was wondering why there is no packages.d.o pseudo-package?
packages.d.o makes most of the bugs for www.debian.org and
this makes the lists as long and as difficult to read as they are.
And I think the people that work on www.d.o and not on p.d.o
will not really miss the huge amount
)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Noel Koethe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: www.debian.org: packages.d.o https:// lines in description are no
links
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1
Date: Sun
Hi all.
I've thought about the packages.d.o problems (only i386 and that...)
and I wonder if I could not do something for Debian and rewrite this
stuff. This is more a long term plan since I've no time in the next
weeks (perhaps even in the next two months) but at least I'm
interested
Package: www.debian.org
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-03-23
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
http:// URLs in the package description are links on the packages.d.o pages.
for example http://packages.debian.org/unstable/web/wget.html
When using https:// in the description the URLs are no links
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 185964 patch
Bug#185964: www.debian.org: packages.d.o https:// lines in description are no
links
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Package: www.debian.org
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-01-22
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
When searching on:
http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
Browsers that do DOM-caching (ala Internet Explorer) lose their search position
in the
Jay Bonci:
Browsers that do DOM-caching (ala Internet Explorer) lose their
search position in the dropdown if you hit back after searching.
Sounds like a bug in the browser, rather than in the page.
--
\\//
Peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/
I do not read or respond to mail with HTML
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 01:01:49PM +0100, Peter Karlsson wrote:
Browsers that do DOM-caching (ala Internet Explorer) lose their
search position in the dropdown if you hit back after searching.
Sounds like a bug in the browser, rather than in the page.
I'm inclined to agree with Peter. Just
Package: www.debian.org
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-01-19
Followup-For: Bug #21620
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stable/testing
Architecture: powerpc
Kernel: Linux nuit.ca 2.4.19 #1 lun déc 23 19:16:46 EST 2002 ppc
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fr_CA
when someone selects an arch
+0200
Received: from ydirson by kasba.alcove-fr with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 15qy2r-0001EY-00; Tue, 09 Oct 2001 16:39:45 +0200
From: Yann Dirson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: packages.d.o: substring search does not work
X-Reportbug-Version
Jul 2001 10:52:01 +0200
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 10:52:01 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: packages.d.o doesn't search on subwords in package names
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Marko Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition
Package: www.debian.org
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-06
Severity: normal
Hi folks,
when I search on for e.g. openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-de on
http://packages.debian.org (or follow the link from my developer.php
page), the script returns
Malformed query! (Or something strange
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
when I search on for e.g. openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-de on
http://packages.debian.org (or follow the link from my developer.php
page), the script returns
Malformed query! (Or something strange happened to this script.)
May it be that the package name's
+0200
Received: from ydirson by kasba.alcove-fr with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 15qy2r-0001EY-00; Tue, 09 Oct 2001 16:39:45 +0200
From: Yann Dirson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: packages.d.o: substring search does not work
X-Reportbug
Jul 2001 10:52:01 +0200
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 10:52:01 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: packages.d.o doesn't search on subwords in package names
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Marko Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 103694
Bug#103694: packages.d.o doesn't search on subwords in package names
Bug#115004: packages.d.o: needs searching on REAL subwords
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Hi all,
The packages.d.o pages do not mention on which a package build-depends...
Such extra information is very handy if you want to compile a newer version of
a program (e.g. noteedit...) and want to quickly see which debian packages
are required to compile it yes, yes, indeed, a newer
On Friday 08 November 2002 10:47, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
* E.L. Willighagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-11-08 10:36]:
The packages.d.o pages do not mention on which a package build-depends...
That's not exactly true: There are three links for the source package
there. If you take a look
* E.L. Willighagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-11-08 11:10]:
On Friday 08 November 2002 10:47, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
* E.L. Willighagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-11-08 10:36]:
The packages.d.o pages do not mention on which a package build-depends...
That's not exactly true: There are three links
Package: www.debian.org
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-10-27
Severity: normal
-- snip --
$ lynx -dump http://packages.debian.org/skipstone
Debian package search results
_
Release Package
Your message dated Sun, 27 Oct 2002 13:13:40 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#166584: packages.d.o/skipstone doesn't work
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2002-05-30
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
in the list of the files in a package, it should be possible to download one
single file from the package. So you could read the package documentation
before you install it.
With kind regards
Torsten
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 131631 www.debian.org
Bug#131631: packages.debian.org/mac-fdisk returns 404
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `www.debian.org'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2002-01-22
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Like #103889(packages.d.o: should give link to changelog), my
request is about add a link in the bottom of each package page.
Why? Because is important to users read
]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: packages.d.o should point to file list for packages
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.15
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.15
Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 18:47:04 +0200
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Egon Willighagen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
22:41:09 +0200
Received: from dwitch by bylbo.nowhere.earth with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 159vJW-0006JO-00; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 23:03:02 +0200
From: Yann Dirson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: bugs.d.o, packages.d.o: broken again for packages
Your message dated Wed, 10 Oct 2001 10:14:39 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#115004: packages.d.o: substring search does not work
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2001-10-09
Severity: important
For example, search for office, then for siagoffice in package
names.
Another example, strings like patch appear to match all packages
whose name *starts* with patch, but fails to find all
kernel-patch-*, which the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
merge 102214 103889 108578
Bug#102214: package page should offer link to changelog.Debian !
Bug#103889: packages.d.o: should give link to changelog
Bug#108578: www.debian.org: packages.debian.org: link to view change log
directly from package page
101 - 200 of 226 matches
Mail list logo
