Hi Philipp,
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 15:51:35 +0200
Philipp Kern wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
> Severity: important
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ad...@lists.debian.org, holg...@debian.org
>
> Hi,
>
> Filing here as I'm not sure if there's a better place (the repository on
> Salsa does not allow issue
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ad...@lists.debian.org, holg...@debian.org
Hi,
Filing here as I'm not sure if there's a better place (the repository on
Salsa does not allow issue filing and there's no real contact link, and
the repo is owned by webmaster-team).
I
Thanks. But: The older page needs to mention the newer page, else
people who end up on the older page will think that that is all they are
allowed to see.
In fact the older page should use the links from the newer page, to make its
flat list clickable.
Also both pages don't have any file dates. T
You are probably looking for this URL:
https://sources.debian.org/src/gdal/3.9.1~rc2%2Bdfsg-1~exp1/[1]
On Monday, June 24, 2024 4:22:49 AM MST Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Package: general
>
> Here we are looking at a list of files,
> https://packages.debian.org/experimental/amd64/gdal-
On 24/06/2024 12:22, Dan Jacobson wrote:
Package: general
Here we are looking at a list of files,
https://packages.debian.org/experimental/amd64/gdal-bin/filelist
but cannot click them to see their contents.
Hi Dan,
Try looking here
https://sources.debian.org/src/gdal/3.9.0%2Bdfsg-1
d, OR, USA)
TLS Setup: 5.77s
Sending: 0ms
Waiting: 1.07min
Receiving: 0ms
(503)
--JH
[0] https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/libc6
[1] https://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
[2] https://packages.debian.org/stable/
Recently the site packages.debian.org gives me HTTP error 503 so I'm not able
to view packages or search in the packages.
The initial site https://www.debian.org/distrib/packages works most of the
time, but when I click e.g. "View the packages in the stable distribution" I
ge
> > > packages.d.o ...
> > > you are right, debian-master seems to be the correct branch.
> > > I will fix it also in debian-master.
> > >
> > > Do you know if the branch master is used for anything?
> >
> > Don't know.
>
> Maybe
Your message dated Sat, 25 May 2024 16:48:35 +
with message-id <66521663982fc_28480f94c55...@godard.mail>
and subject line Bug#1016694 fixed in www.debian.org
has caused the Debian Bug report #1016694,
regarding packages.debian.org uses favicon with white shadow
to be marked as done.
Am 24. Mai 2024 20:16:35 MESZ schrieb Holger Wansing :
>
>
>Am 24. Mai 2024 20:10:35 MESZ schrieb Thomas Lange :
>>> On Fri, 24 May 2024 20:02:35 +0200, Holger Wansing
>>> said:
>>
>>> Hi Thomas,
>>> you fixed this in master branch.
>>> Are you sure about this?
>>> I so
Am 24. Mai 2024 20:10:35 MESZ schrieb Thomas Lange :
>> On Fri, 24 May 2024 20:02:35 +0200, Holger Wansing
>> said:
>
>> Hi Thomas,
>> you fixed this in master branch.
>> Are you sure about this?
>> I somehow seem to remember, that debian-master branch is used for
> pa
> On Fri, 24 May 2024 20:02:35 +0200, Holger Wansing
> said:
> Hi Thomas,
> you fixed this in master branch.
> Are you sure about this?
> I somehow seem to remember, that debian-master branch is used for
packages.d.o ...
you are right, debian-master seems to be the corre
Hi Thomas,
you fixed this in master branch.
Are you sure about this?
I somehow seem to remember, that debian-master branch is used for packages.d.o
...
Holger
Von:Thomas Lange
An:1071739-done@bugs.debian.orgGesendet:Fri May 24
19:31:01 GMT+02:00 2024Betreff:Bug#1071739 fixed in www.debi
Your message dated Fri, 24 May 2024 17:31:01 +
with message-id <6650ced53bb43_28480f94c54...@godard.mail>
and subject line Bug#1071739 fixed in www.debian.org
has caused the Debian Bug report #1071739,
regarding packages.debian.org: Removal of spam domain from download mirror page
to be
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: www.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: packages
X-Debbugs-Cc: sa...@debian.org
Below content is verbatim from
<https://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2024/05/msg00039.html>
Hello,
While downloading binary file for a package, on download p
Ad and tracking server list). URL seems like spam and would request it's
removal.
[1] https://packages.debian.org/sid/all/asn/download
Regards,
Sahil
Your message dated Tue, 7 May 2024 21:08:08 -0400
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#998672: packages.debian.org: all arch:all packages
have empty filelist
has caused the Debian Bug report #998672,
regarding packages.debian.org: all arch:all packages have empty filelist
to be marked as
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: serious
Tags: security
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team
Hello,
In packages.debian.org, links pointing to the different source files
useful for a package are pointing to deb.debian.org via HTTP (not HTTPS)
links.
See https://packages.debian.org/bookworm
Hi all,
The backend server of packages.debian.org that I access is now returning 503.
It seems to be affecting multiple users.
% curl -vv https://packages.debian.org/unstable/ink-generator
* Host packages.debian.org:443 was resolved.
* IPv6: 2603:400a::bb8::801f:33, 2a02:16a8:dc41:100::132
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2024 11:24:55 -0700
with message-id <0ea52cdb-59dd-4fb6-ac9c-1122588b0...@thelittleman.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#1061354: Acknowledgement (packages.debian.org: MIT
mirror returns 503 error)
has caused the Debian Bug report #1061354,
regarding packages.debi
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
packages.debian.org appears to likely have two physical hosts, one at MIT, and
one
hosted via conova(?):
=
packages.debian.org has address 128.31.0.51
packages.debian.org has address 195.192.210.132
packages.debian.org has
Hi,
On Sun, 31 Dec 2023 20:14:00 -0500 Boyuan Yang wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
> Severity: important
>
> Visiting https://packages.debian.org/sid/all/ , all package you click (such as
> https://packages.debian.org/sid/all/admin/ and then
> https://packages.debian.org/sid/
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
Dear packages.d.o team,
Binary download pages like this one:
https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/all/nlohmann-json3-dev/download
only offer http links to packages and not https links.
firefox flags downloading binaries through http links as dangerous
Hi, I saw that only some adep/dep link of virtual packages are
supported, for example:
https://packages.debian.org/source/sid/cjs
> adep: dh-sequence-gir
> virtual package provided by gobject-introspection
>
> adep: dh-sequence-gnome
> Package not a
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: important
Visiting https://packages.debian.org/sid/all/ , all package you click (such as
https://packages.debian.org/sid/all/admin/ and then
https://packages.debian.org/sid/all/admin/0install will return 404).
The same applies when replacing "sid"
Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2023 04:34:08 +0200
with message-id <25908.35360.525876.37...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #845601,
regarding packages.debian.org: add form to search code of source packages
to be marked as done.
This means th
Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2023 04:30:44 +0200
with message-id <25908.35156.587659.831...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #742550,
regarding packages.debian.org: include a warning on packages from
contrib/non-free
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2023 04:23:32 +0200
with message-id <25908.34724.475443.374...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #472809,
regarding packages.debian.org: access buildinfo.gz files
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2023 04:26:00 +0200
with message-id <25908.34872.658380.517...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #461672,
regarding packages.debian.org: search wnpp, mentors
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2023 04:16:23 +0200
with message-id <25908.34295.617555.351...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #391359,
regarding packages.debian.org: package view could have a link to the upstream
changelog
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2023 04:09:30 +0200
with message-id <25908.33882.205193.353...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #268658,
regarding packages.debian.org: Provide cheksums of package contents
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2023 04:13:44 +0200
with message-id <25908.34136.814517.659...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #407548,
regarding packages.debian.org: Should include reverse-depends
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2023 04:14:22 +0200
with message-id <25908.34174.323437.313...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #368157,
regarding packages.debian.org/unstable: clarify if non-free etc. is included
to be marked as done.
This means th
Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2023 04:12:38 +0200
with message-id <25908.34070.442770.246...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #777306,
regarding packages.debian.org: add upstream donation links
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2023 04:08:54 +0200
with message-id <25908.33846.58991.517...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #450841,
regarding packages.debian.org: old packages should show current maintainer
to be marked as done.
This means th
Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2023 04:03:40 +0200
with message-id <25908.33532.652250.16...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #207095,
regarding packages.debian.org: should give date of last update
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2023 03:59:06 +0200
with message-id <25908.33258.453118.972...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #176407,
regarding packages.debian.org: search_contents: should accept regexps
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2023 03:30:49 +0200
with message-id <25908.31561.256691.979...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #443996,
regarding packages.debian.org: please provide a RSS/Atom feed for package
changelogs
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Tue, 3 Oct 2023 17:02:12 +0200
with message-id <25884.11508.992501.262...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #17590,
regarding packages.debian.org: Cannot search within compressed deb
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Your message dated Tue, 3 Oct 2023 17:02:12 +0200
with message-id <25884.11508.992501.262...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #17590,
regarding packages.debian.org: search_contents: search contents of source
packages
to be marked as done.
This mean
How to run packages.debian.org locally?
error
> console:
>
> > Mixed Content: The site at 'https://packages.debian.org/' was loaded over
> > a secure connection, but the file at
> > 'https://deb.debian.org/debian/pool/main/a/agg/agg_2.6.1-r134+dfsg1-2.debi
> > an.tar.xz' was redirected
Now all works again.
Thank you!!!
чт, 15 июн. 2023 г. в 02:55, Сергей Сёмин :
> Hello!
>
> I'm having problems with access to https://packages.debian.org/
> My browser on laptop says ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED
> But my phone, when I use 4G, works perfectly.
&
Hello!
I'm having problems with access to https://packages.debian.org/
My browser on laptop says ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED
But my phone, when I use 4G, works perfectly.
It looks like https://packages.debian.org banned my static ip 95.165.103.19
associated with my home WiFi router used by my not
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jun 2023 13:23:39 +0200
with message-id <20230614112339.egnolq52rntct...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#992258: packages.debian.org still not showing
bullseye-security packages
has caused the Debian Bug report #992258,
regarding www.debian.org: packages.debi
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jun 2023 13:23:39 +0200
with message-id <20230614112339.egnolq52rntct...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#992258: packages.debian.org still not showing
bullseye-security packages
has caused the Debian Bug report #992258,
regarding packages.debian.org: missing se
Cyril Brulebois (2023-06-13):
> Let's see if those help:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/packages/-/compare/f673a47d01...4111b73ede
That wasn't sufficient, because of some earlier check/optimization. And
there was another thing that was missed, which would have prevented it
from wo
Your message dated Tue, 13 Jun 2023 20:54:23 +0200
with message-id <20230613185423.pratpqklcjpfx...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1037479: 500 Internal Server Error accessing
https://packages.debian.org/testing/name_of_package
has caused the Debian Bug report #1037479,
regarding 500 In
(Adding back submitter, and everyone who mailed that bug report.)
Hi,
Colomban Wendling (2022-10-25):
> I have unfortunately no insight on how this could be fixed, but it's
> rather inconvenient as packages.debian.org is thus effectively not a
> trustable source for Bullseye.
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 patch pending
Bug #1037479 [www.debian.org] 500 Internal Server Error accessing
https://packages.debian.org/testing/name_of_package
Added tag(s) patch and pending.
--
1037479: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1037479
Debian Bug Track
Control: tag -1 patch pending
Hi,
And yes, thanks for reporting!
Laura Arjona Reina (2023-06-13):
> Thanks for the report. It seems that our website packages.debian.org
> still doesn't recognize trixie being testing.
It's worse than that: it doesn't know about trixie
Package: www.debian.org
User: www.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertag: packages
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: kevin.torkel...@gmail.com, webmas...@debian.org
Hi Kevin
Thanks for the report. It seems that our website packages.debian.org still
doesn't recognize trixie being testing
Your message dated Tue, 13 Jun 2023 06:01:56 +0200
with message-id <18eee979-ed7a-4aa0-b1a2-993f454d3...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1037355: Acknowledgement (packages.debian.org: wrong
mapping codename <-> stable)
has caused the Debian Bug report #1037355,
regarding package
Package: www.debian.org
In the search form, at packages.debian.org, bullseye is still stable.
Please update the suites (similar to
https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/packages/-/commit/4648ee328d98a903bb9212b7ffb1f42fa9db773d)
The old issue of hardcoded suitenames ... (?)
Holger
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #1016694 [www.debian.org] packages.debian.org uses favicon with white shadow
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> owner -1 !
Bug #1016694 [www.debian.org] packages.debian.org uses favicon with white shadow
Owner recorded as Akbarkhon Varis
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Control: owner -1 !
Hello, Alexander. Nice catch.
It looks whacky indeed. We already have a good icon available at
another resource, so it's just a matter of replacing the bad one.
Thanks for the report.
I've been faced with same issue (workarounded with own user script), would
it be fixed in the future?
Thanks,
Kisaragi
Hi,
Investigating on this point, could this be related to those lines here:
https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/packages/-/blob/master/config.sh.sed.in#L27
?
Thanks,
Patrice
Hi,
I do not know where to address this (a pseudo package?) and looking
into webwml does give me any result.
The concern is with some of the links provided here for instance:
https://packages.debian.org/unstable/graphviz
All the URLs under the 'Download Source Package xx' section
Hi Jochen,
(Answering with my “I have the gid by accident” hat.)
Jochen Sprickerhof (2023-01-20):
> There are more old files that should probably go:
>
> jspricke@picconi:/srv/packages.debian.org/archive/debports$ find -type f
> -mtime +0 -exec ls -l {} \;
> -rw-r--r-- 1 pkg
Hi,
I think this is due to:
ssh picconi.debian.org ls -l
/srv/packages.debian.org/archive/debports/sid/Contents-arm64.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 pkg_user pkg_maint 27303127 Nov 6 2014
/srv/packages.debian.org/archive/debports/sid/Contents-arm64.gz
Deleting that file should solve it.
There are more
Hi *,
I have several package URLs in my urlwatch.yaml, e.g. [1]
For that URL, I get urlwatch.jobs.NotModifiedError every other time I
run urlwatch. This translates to HTTP 200 and HTTP 304 taking turns.
dig packages.debian.org gives
;; ANSWER SECTION:
packages.debian.org.300 IN
d versions of bug #1027265 to the same values
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1027265 to the same values
previously set
> user www.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to www.debian@packages.debian.org (was p...@debian.org).
> usertags 1027265 - wik
.org'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1027265 to the same values
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1027265 to the same values
previously set
> user www.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to www.debian@packages.debian.org (was p...@deb
Package: www.debian.org
Followup-For: Bug #1003729
X-Debbugs-Cc: alt.people.davidcal...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
It's still missing from packages.debian.org. I'm now worried that Bullseye
will be the same way.
It says: "two or more packages specified"
https://packages.debian.org/source/stable-security/firefox-esr
Idézem/Quoting Colomban Wendling :
Hello,
This is still an issue as of today regarding the bullseye-security
section being missing.
See for example the linux-image-amd64 or f
Hello,
This is still an issue as of today regarding the bullseye-security
section being missing.
See for example the linux-image-amd64 or firefox-esr packages:
linux-image-amd64:
- https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=linux-image-amd64
(bullseye shows 5.10.140-1)
- apt policy
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
I switched my browser to use dark theme and access packages.debian.org with it.
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
I switched my browser to use dark
Hi,
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> I've rebooted the server so I guess someone[tm] will need to keep an
> eye on things during / after the next cron run.
Seems to have fixed the recent data lag:
https://packages.debian.org/sid/hugo is now showing the expected
0.100.1-1 version. Thanks!
# bcc control@bugs
user www.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags 1012598 + packages
thanks
Hi,
On Fri, 2022-06-10 at 00:57 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> packages.debian.org shows outdated package versions for Unstable and
> Testing. It shows version from between 1 and 2 weeks ago for
Hi Adam,
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-06-10 at 00:57 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > packages.debian.org shows outdated package versions for Unstable and
> > Testing. It shows version from between 1 and 2 weeks ago for those
> > recently uploaded packages I check
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: a...@debian.org
packages.debian.org shows outdated package versions for Unstable and
Testing. It shows version from between 1 and 2 weeks ago for those
recently uploaded packages I checked.
Is there something no more syncing package
On Thu, 2022-02-10 at 12:36 -0800, Forest wrote:
> No comments? The site itself says to come here to report problems.
> Is there a better place to report this one?
Thanks for the report, but this issue is already known:
https://bugs.debian.org/992258
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/Pau
On Wed, 26 Jan 2022 13:39:30 -0800, Forest wrote:
>I recently noticed that packages.debian.org does not show the current
>version of a package if it comes from bullseye-security. This makes the
>site considerably less useful for tasks like checking CVE patch
>availability.
>
I recently noticed that packages.debian.org does not show the current
version of a package if it comes from bullseye-security. This makes the
site considerably less useful for tasks like checking CVE patch
availability.
Could it be an oversight, perhaps related to the archive layout change that
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2022 06:07:59 +
with message-id <61ef93bfb3eb7_3e32ab9fe5765c445...@godard.mail>
and subject line Bug#977006 fixed in www.debian.org
has caused the Debian Bug report #977006,
regarding packages.debian.org: No list of files for arch:all packages
to be mar
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2022 06:07:59 +
with message-id <61ef93bfb3eb7_3e32ab9fe5765c445...@godard.mail>
and subject line Bug#977006 fixed in www.debian.org
has caused the Debian Bug report #977006,
regarding packages.debian.org: "list of files" fails on sid/testing ar
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2022 06:07:59 +
with message-id <61ef93bfb3eb7_3e32ab9fe5765c445...@godard.mail>
and subject line Bug#977006 fixed in www.debian.org
has caused the Debian Bug report #977006,
regarding packages.debian.org: filelist is currently broken for some packages
bullseye-security is not displayed in packages.debian.org
See for example
https://packages.debian.org/thunderbird
1:91.4.1-1 (security) is not shown as available for bullseye
Best regards
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: s...@debian.org
Hi,
the "buster-backports-sloppy" suite is missing from the package search.
Simon
* Vipul Kumar [2021-11-10 11:12]:
The "filelist" feature on packages.debian.org is still broken for some
Sid's packages. Patch indeed worked for Bullseye and Bookworm (neither
of which worked before), but somehow not for Sid. For example, https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/al
Hi,
Am 3. Januar 2022 20:15:50 MEZ schrieb Robert :
>Hello, I wasn't quite sure where to report this but this is where it said
>to send problems with the website. There is a typo in the description of
>the package. The typo is in the word "package" in the third sentence, I've
>highlighted it in sq
Hello, I wasn't quite sure where to report this but this is where it said
to send problems with the website. There is a typo in the description of
the package. The typo is in the word "package" in the third sentence, I've
highlighted it in square brackets.
"LibreOffice is a full-featured office pr
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 www.debian.org
Bug #998172 [whohas] packages.debian.org: reports incorrect info to 'whohas'
Bug reassigned from package 'whohas' to 'www.debian.org'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #998172 to the sam
Control: reassign -1 www.debian.org
Control: user www.debian@packages.debian.org
Control: usertags -1 + packages
Control: retitle -1 packages.debian.org: missing security updates for bullseye
Control: forcemerge 992258 -1
On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 08:17:25 +0100 Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Tha
Hi,
I'm running Debian bullseye and have firefox 78.15.0esr-1~deb11u1 from
bullseye-security, but packages.debian.org is still showing
78.14.0esr-1~deb11u1 as the firefox-esr version available in Debian
bullseye [1].
So the patch of Rhonda D'Vine, did not have an effect on at leas
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1 !
Bug #977006 {Done: Rhonda D'Vine } [www.debian.org]
packages.debian.org: filelist is currently broken for some packages
Bug #977743 {Done: Rhonda D'Vine } [www.debian.org]
packages.debian.org: "list of files" fails on sid/te
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: mo...@debian.org
Hello,
i think this problem has been going on for quite a while (months): all arch:all
packages have empty filelist, f.e.
https://packages.debian.org/sid/all/python3-poetry-core/filelist
please have a look as that piece
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: dfo...@gmail.com
Dear maintainer,
trying to download .deb files or .tar.gz files from p.d.o. with Chromium
Versione 93.0.4577.82 silently fails.
For example, go to https://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/gnokii/download and
click to a
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: important
User: www.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: packages
Dear Maintainer,
It seems that packages.debian.org does not resolve versioned provides
Javascript (node-) is based on it so this a major problem for the javascript
teams
See instance https
Your message dated Mon, 23 Aug 2021 22:00:16 +
with message-id <61241a70a0f88_52212ab33d1465c090...@godard.mail>
and subject line Bug#977006 fixed in www.debian.org
has caused the Debian Bug report #977006,
regarding packages.debian.org: "list of files" fails on sid/testing ar
Your message dated Mon, 23 Aug 2021 22:00:16 +
with message-id <61241a70a0f88_52212ab33d1465c090...@godard.mail>
and subject line Bug#977006 fixed in www.debian.org
has caused the Debian Bug report #977006,
regarding packages.debian.org: No list of files for arch:all packages
to be mar
Your message dated Mon, 23 Aug 2021 22:00:16 +
with message-id <61241a709869a_52212ab33d1465c090...@godard.mail>
and subject line Bug#923974 fixed in www.debian.org
has caused the Debian Bug report #923974,
regarding packages.debian.org filelist incorrect (for some archs)
to be marked a
Your message dated Mon, 23 Aug 2021 22:00:16 +
with message-id <61241a70a0f88_52212ab33d1465c090...@godard.mail>
and subject line Bug#977006 fixed in www.debian.org
has caused the Debian Bug report #977006,
regarding packages.debian.org: filelist is currently broken for some packages
Hi,
Am 22. August 2021 14:57:23 MESZ schrieb Mechtilde :
>Thanks for the work.
>
>It seems now bookworm (testing) should be added to the list
AFAICS this has been dealed with in Rhonda's MR.
Don't know what's missing...
Holger
>Am 22.08.21 um 13:51 schrieb Holger Wansing:
>> Daniel Lewart wrot
Hi,
Daniel Lewart wrote (Sat, 21 Aug 2021 22:08:30 -0500):
> Uwe,
>
> > looking at:
> > https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=thunderbird&searchon=names&suite=stable§ion=all
> > this lists the thunderbird packages from buster, while bullseye is the
> >
Thanks for the work.
It seems now bookworm (testing) should be added to the list
Am 22.08.21 um 13:51 schrieb Holger Wansing:
> Hi,
>
> Daniel Lewart wrote (Sat, 21 Aug 2021 22:08:30 -0500):
>> Uwe,
>>
>>> looking at:
>>> https://packages.debian.org/sea
Uwe,
> looking at:
> https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=thunderbird&searchon=names&suite=stable§ion=all
> this lists the thunderbird packages from buster, while bullseye is the
> current stable release.
> Probably related to that packages.d.o doesn't know a
Hallo Mechtilde,
Mechtilde Stehmann (2021-08-18):
> after releasing Debian 11 (bullseye I want to follow the migration from
> sid to the new testing (Bookworm) at packages.debian.org
Usually tracker.debian.org is a nice(r) entry point to follow one
package's progress across suites
Hello,
after releasing Debian 11 (bullseye I want to follow the migration from
sid to the new testing (Bookworm) at packages.debian.org
I hope you can refresh the sites so it is seen there.
If this isn't the right place to inform you, please give me a hint.
Kind regards
--
Mechtilde Ste
1 - 100 of 1529 matches
Mail list logo
