On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 09:52:40AM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote:
> Then what is adequate? Sensible-x-terminal-emulator is.
In conclusion I agree with you, but there might be contrary views.
I wish you state tell your ideas of better solutions freely.
> BTW, what is KSC5636? Additional characters
Hi,
From: Anthony Towns
Subject: Re: sensible-x-terminal and x-terminal-emulator
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 11:03:31 +1000
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 09:52:40AM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote:
> > Then what is adequate? Sensible-x-terminal-emulator is.
>
> Has someone prototyped this yet?
I did. Pl
Hi,
From: Chu-yeon Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: sensible-x-terminal and x-terminal-emulator
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 02:48:00 +0900
>> Or, how about using KTERM as the default X terminal emulator for
>> Debian until the ideal international X terminal emulator will be
>> available? Kterm s
On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 09:52:40AM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote:
> Then what is adequate? Sensible-x-terminal-emulator is.
In conclusion I agree with you, but there might be contrary views.
I wish you state tell your ideas of better solutions freely.
> BTW, what is KSC5636? Additional character
Hi,
From: Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: sensible-x-terminal and x-terminal-emulator
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 11:03:31 +1000
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 09:52:40AM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote:
> > Then what is adequate? Sensible-x-terminal-emulator is.
>
> Has someone prototyped t
Hi,
From: Chu-yeon Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: sensible-x-terminal and x-terminal-emulator
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 02:48:00 +0900
>> Or, how about using KTERM as the default X terminal emulator for
>> Debian until the ideal international X terminal emulator will be
>> available? Kterm
On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 11:16:11AM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote:
> You might be right. However, you are too idealistic. Asian people
> need sensible-x-terminal-emulator NOW. This need is concrete and
> your 'feedback loop' is only a possibility. And the possibility
> can be avoided because the
On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 11:16:11AM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote:
> You might be right. However, you are too idealistic. Asian people
> need sensible-x-terminal-emulator NOW. This need is concrete and
> your 'feedback loop' is only a possibility. And the possibility
> can be avoided because th
On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 12:38:29AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> This is mainly what I'm getting it. xterm is actively maintained these
> days, and what's more, its maintainer seems to really care about i18n
> issues. He's applied dozens of patches from Markus Kuhn, who's heavily
> into Unicod
On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 11:16:11AM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote:
> If it is the most important to stop the 'feedback loop' and promote
> international Xterm, we should rather adopt a 7-bit terminal emulator
> as the default so that not only Asian people but also European-language
> speakers are
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 10:44:46AM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote:
> Ok, I can design a way to avoid hard-coding. It will have a configuration
> file in /etc directory. All X terminal emulators which supports special
> language like multibyte, combining, right-to-left, and up-to-down
> languages w
11 matches
Mail list logo
