On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 10:11:57PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
>
> > The subject says most of it, the packages are at
> > http://master.debian.org/~warp/, they are /not/ apt-able right now, I'll
> > sort that out tomorrow.
>
> Did you miss the
On Mon, 26 Mar 2001 23:36:57 -0500
"Zephaniah E\. Hull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The subject says most of it, the packages are at
> http://master.debian.org/~warp/, they are /not/ apt-able right now, I'll
> sort that out tomorrow.
OK. Please post to this list and say when it's aptable.
> The
On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> The subject says most of it, the packages are at
> http://master.debian.org/~warp/, they are /not/ apt-able right now, I'll
> sort that out tomorrow.
Did you miss the memo that this sort of thing should be on klecker and
referenced through people.d
The subject says most of it, the packages are at
http://master.debian.org/~warp/, they are /not/ apt-able right now, I'll
sort that out tomorrow.
They are still very much in testing, follow the depends on the packages,
and, err, you may have to do an ldconfig after installing xlibmesa3-dri,
I forg
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 10:11:57PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
>
> > The subject says most of it, the packages are at
> > http://master.debian.org/~warp/, they are /not/ apt-able right now, I'll
> > sort that out tomorrow.
>
> Did you miss the
On Mon, 26 Mar 2001 23:36:57 -0500
"Zephaniah E\. Hull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The subject says most of it, the packages are at
> http://master.debian.org/~warp/, they are /not/ apt-able right now, I'll
> sort that out tomorrow.
OK. Please post to this list and say when it's aptable.
> Th
On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> The subject says most of it, the packages are at
> http://master.debian.org/~warp/, they are /not/ apt-able right now, I'll
> sort that out tomorrow.
Did you miss the memo that this sort of thing should be on klecker and
referenced through people.
The subject says most of it, the packages are at
http://master.debian.org/~warp/, they are /not/ apt-able right now, I'll
sort that out tomorrow.
They are still very much in testing, follow the depends on the packages,
and, err, you may have to do an ldconfig after installing xlibmesa3-dri,
I for
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 07:00:40PM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
>> The packages sharefont and freefont (they contain non-free fonts)
>> place the fonts in sharefont and freefont subdirectories. I think
>> that there is good reason about this -- we don't
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 02:46:11PM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> The simple attached patch vs. 4.0.2-11 forces us to use fbdev, but seems to
> generate a viable XF68Config-4. Is there some reason we don't have something
> like this yet (aside from the broken module loader)?
The module loader s
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 02:52:57PM -0500, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> > Are you sure both are needed? Your xserver-xfree86-dri package should
> > provide a superset of the modules that my xserver-xfree86 package does.
>
> Actually it is a subset, providing only what is used by the DRI code and
> l
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 07:00:40PM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> I have two comments about the X font policy.
>
> This is an excerpt from the policy:
>
> 5. Subdirectories of /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/ other than those
>listed above should be neither created nor used. (The PEX and
>
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 07:00:40PM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
>> The packages sharefont and freefont (they contain non-free fonts)
>> place the fonts in sharefont and freefont subdirectories. I think
>> that there is good reason about this -- we don'
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 02:08:53PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 01:58:00PM -0500, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> > After much prodding and poking I have it down to three issues, the
> > naming scheme is as follows, with the issues below.
> >
> > xlibmesa3-dri contains libGL
Hello,
The simple attached patch vs. 4.0.2-11 forces us to use fbdev, but seems to
generate a viable XF68Config-4. Is there some reason we don't have something
like this yet (aside from the broken module loader)?
ARM people, what other drivers are necessary or eventually hoped to work?
Just won
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 01:58:00PM -0500, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> After much prodding and poking I have it down to three issues, the
> naming scheme is as follows, with the issues below.
>
> xlibmesa3-dri contains libGL, libGLU, and libGLw, it also contains
> usr/X11R6/lib/modules.dri/dri/(gamm
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 02:46:11PM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> The simple attached patch vs. 4.0.2-11 forces us to use fbdev, but seems to
> generate a viable XF68Config-4. Is there some reason we don't have something
> like this yet (aside from the broken module loader)?
The module loader
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 02:52:57PM -0500, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> > Are you sure both are needed? Your xserver-xfree86-dri package should
> > provide a superset of the modules that my xserver-xfree86 package does.
>
> Actually it is a subset, providing only what is used by the DRI code and
>
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 07:00:40PM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> I have two comments about the X font policy.
>
> This is an excerpt from the policy:
>
> 5. Subdirectories of /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/ other than those
>listed above should be neither created nor used. (The PEX and
>
After much prodding and poking I have it down to three issues, the
naming scheme is as follows, with the issues below.
xlibmesa3-dri contains libGL, libGLU, and libGLw, it also contains
usr/X11R6/lib/modules.dri/dri/(gamma|i810|mga|r128|radeon|sis|tdfx)_dri.so.
xlibmesa-dri-dev contains the devel
Hi!
I have two comments about the X font policy.
This is an excerpt from the policy:
5. Subdirectories of /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/ other than those
listed above should be neither created nor used. (The PEX and
cyrillic directories are excepted for historical reasons, but
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 02:08:53PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 01:58:00PM -0500, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> > After much prodding and poking I have it down to three issues, the
> > naming scheme is as follows, with the issues below.
> >
> > xlibmesa3-dri contains libG
Hello,
The simple attached patch vs. 4.0.2-11 forces us to use fbdev, but seems to
generate a viable XF68Config-4. Is there some reason we don't have something
like this yet (aside from the broken module loader)?
ARM people, what other drivers are necessary or eventually hoped to work?
Just wo
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Drew Parsons wrote:
> I've got Bug #90459, which says libXmu was not identified when
> compiling on vore (that's sparc, isn't it? not that it's real
> important).
>
> The autobuild log at http://vore.debian.org/buildlogs/viewmol says:
>
> ... cc -c -Wall -I/usr/X11R6/include
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 01:58:00PM -0500, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> After much prodding and poking I have it down to three issues, the
> naming scheme is as follows, with the issues below.
>
> xlibmesa3-dri contains libGL, libGLU, and libGLw, it also contains
> usr/X11R6/lib/modules.dri/dri/(gam
After much prodding and poking I have it down to three issues, the
naming scheme is as follows, with the issues below.
xlibmesa3-dri contains libGL, libGLU, and libGLw, it also contains
usr/X11R6/lib/modules.dri/dri/(gamma|i810|mga|r128|radeon|sis|tdfx)_dri.so.
xlibmesa-dri-dev contains the deve
[removed debian-release from list -- please don't use that list for
these questions]
Mantas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> There are no lithuanian keymap for XFree 3.3.6 in potato rev.2. I
> >> would like you to include it in potato rev.3. I have working keymap
> >> and I can send it to you
Marcelo E. Magallon schrieb:
> Only G200 and up do accelerated 3D rendering on Linux.
Uh, well, "acceleration" might be exagerated for my G200 ...
Really nice 2D card though.
ciao, 2ri
--
We all know Linux is great... it does infinite loops in 5 seconds.
-- Linus Torvalds
I've got Bug #90459, which says libXmu was not identified when compiling on
vore (that's sparc, isn't it? not that it's real important).
The autobuild log at http://vore.debian.org/buildlogs/viewmol says:
...
cc -c -Wall -I/usr/X11R6/include -DLINUX -I/usr/include
-I/usr/include/python1.5 -O6 -fo
Hi!
I have two comments about the X font policy.
This is an excerpt from the policy:
5. Subdirectories of /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/ other than those
listed above should be neither created nor used. (The PEX and
cyrillic directories are excepted for historical reasons, but
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Drew Parsons wrote:
> I've got Bug #90459, which says libXmu was not identified when
> compiling on vore (that's sparc, isn't it? not that it's real
> important).
>
> The autobuild log at http://vore.debian.org/buildlogs/viewmol says:
>
> ... cc -c -Wall -I/usr/X11R6/includ
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Is there any trouble with an old matrox millenium (2Mo+2Mo)?
Other than the fact that that card won't do any kind of hardware
accelerated 3D rendering on Linux, no, it's a really good card. Still
one of the best ones at what it does. Only G200 and up do accele
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> Ok, the design of the V3 chip is that if you try to talk to it about
> 3D while it is in the middle of doing 2D, or try to talk to it about
> 2D while it is doing 3D then you will have serious problems.
> (FWIW, almost all 2D/3D cards have the same.)
[removed debian-release from list -- please don't use that list for
these questions]
Mantas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> There are no lithuanian keymap for XFree 3.3.6 in potato rev.2. I
> >> would like you to include it in potato rev.3. I have working keymap
> >> and I can send it to yo
Marcelo E. Magallon schrieb:
> Only G200 and up do accelerated 3D rendering on Linux.
Uh, well, "acceleration" might be exagerated for my G200 ...
Really nice 2D card though.
ciao, 2ri
--
We all know Linux is great... it does infinite loops in 5 seconds.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To UNS
I've got Bug #90459, which says libXmu was not identified when compiling on
vore (that's sparc, isn't it? not that it's real important).
The autobuild log at http://vore.debian.org/buildlogs/viewmol says:
...
cc -c -Wall -I/usr/X11R6/include -DLINUX -I/usr/include
-I/usr/include/python1.5 -O6 -f
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Is there any trouble with an old matrox millenium (2Mo+2Mo)?
Other than the fact that that card won't do any kind of hardware
accelerated 3D rendering on Linux, no, it's a really good card. Still
one of the best ones at what it does. Only G200 and up do accel
On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 09:00:51PM -0500, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> I am currently about ready to start testing of .debs out of the DRI cvs
> tree.
*round of applause*
Thank you very, very, much.
I take it you'll post details here when you have debs for us to test.
Jules
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> Ok, the design of the V3 chip is that if you try to talk to it about
> 3D while it is in the middle of doing 2D, or try to talk to it about
> 2D while it is doing 3D then you will have serious problems.
> (FWIW, almost all 2D/3D cards have the same.
Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
>
> (Advice to all users of the fbdev driver: add ``option "shadowfb"'' to your
> device section.)
That should be on by default. If not, it will soon be. :)
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)\ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer
CS student, Free Software ent
On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 09:00:51PM -0500, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> I am currently about ready to start testing of .debs out of the DRI cvs
> tree.
*round of applause*
Thank you very, very, much.
I take it you'll post details here when you have debs for us to test.
Jules
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
>
> (Advice to all users of the fbdev driver: add ``option "shadowfb"'' to your
> device section.)
That should be on by default. If not, it will soon be. :)
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)\ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer
CS student, Free Software en
GS> You mean to say a Voodoo2 graphics card that is sold/marketed/used as a
GS> 3D only chipset, can be used under X4 as a '2D' card? With no other
GS> VESA/VGA card available?
Yep. It's a ``shadowfb'' driver: all rendering is done in software to
a ``shadow framebuffer'', and the updated area of
43 matches
Mail list logo
