Jon Pennington [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Absolutely! This is what I meant to say.
Oh, sorry, I missunderstood.
Shipping the mesademos package in binary form does not make any
sense. There are too many libGL implementations floating around for
that.
Actually, this is a tempting
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 10:26:13AM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
Jon Pennington [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
snip
Shipping the mesademos package in binary form does not make any
sense. There are too many libGL implementations floating around for
that.
Actually, this is a tempting
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 10:26:13AM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
Jon Pennington [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Absolutely! This is what I meant to say.
Oh, sorry, I missunderstood.
It looked that way :)
Shipping the mesademos package in binary form does not make any
sense.
As of this writing only i386 is available. I'm working on powerpc and
sparc for v2.
Architecture porters should note that the MANIFEST file for your arch will
need updating (see debian/402-to-403-MANIFEST-change), as will the
*.{dirs,files,links}.$(ARCH) files in some cases. *.files* are no
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 03:17:19PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
As of this writing only i386 is available. I'm working on powerpc and
sparc for v2.
Hrm, forgot to mention this part:
deb http://people.debian.org/%7Ebranden/ woody/$(ARCH)/
deb-src http://people.debian.org/%7Ebranden/
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 04:33:26PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
From: Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: XFree86 4.0.3-0pre1v1 available for testing
Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 03:17:19PM -0500,
Hello,
I have installed the new dri packages, and at last I have 3gl, I am
getting ~100 fps with the evas_test on my g400. but I do have on
problem.
With enlightenment and imlib1 it can't seem to detect the shared memory,
which also seems to cause the latest version of gnome panel crash as
well.
Jon Pennington [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Absolutely! This is what I meant to say.
Oh, sorry, I missunderstood.
Shipping the mesademos package in binary form does not make any
sense. There are too many libGL implementations floating around for
that.
Actually, this is a tempting
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 10:26:13AM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
Jon Pennington [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
snip
Shipping the mesademos package in binary form does not make any
sense. There are too many libGL implementations floating around for
that.
Actually, this is a tempting
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 10:26:13AM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
Jon Pennington [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Absolutely! This is what I meant to say.
Oh, sorry, I missunderstood.
It looked that way :)
Shipping the mesademos package in binary form does not make any
sense.
As of this writing only i386 is available. I'm working on powerpc and
sparc for v2.
Architecture porters should note that the MANIFEST file for your arch will
need updating (see debian/402-to-403-MANIFEST-change), as will the
*.{dirs,files,links}.$(ARCH) files in some cases. *.files* are no
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 03:17:19PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
As of this writing only i386 is available. I'm working on powerpc and
sparc for v2.
Hrm, forgot to mention this part:
deb http://people.debian.org/%7Ebranden/ woody/$(ARCH)/
deb-src http://people.debian.org/%7Ebranden/
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 12:38:18PM -0700, Jon Pennington wrote:
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 10:26:13AM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
Jon Pennington [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Absolutely! This is what I meant to say.
Oh, sorry, I missunderstood.
It looked that way :)
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 04:33:26PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
From: Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-x@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: XFree86 4.0.3-0pre1v1 available for testing
Mail-Followup-To: debian-x@lists.debian.org
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at
Zephaniah E. Hull [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For instance gears is a /very/ standard benchmark
Yes, I know, I'm hand picking a few of the programs to provide them as
binaries... gears is, well, something someone early on picked as a
benchmark because it's fillrate bound (more accurately,
Jon Pennington [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Like Zeph said, though, the packages are most useful in source
*because* you can use different libGL implementations to compile
them. As I understand it (and I'm probably wrong), libGL
implementations vary in the DRI project from one family of
16 matches
Mail list logo
